Posted: Aug 07, 2013 7:59 pm
by Scar
Arthur Methoxy wrote:I will simplify. My claim for Empedocles rests on the truth or falsity of this statement:

"a polar bears' foot would not be a successful adaptation for a bacterium growing on it despite the environment being the same."

Make a reasoned argument against that, or state some flaw in it. I can see a flaw in it, but I think you will have some difficulty. Could be wrong, we'll see, or not. Try and leave out the complaints this time.


I have found a flaw! It's gibberish!