rationalskepticism.org

Greyman wrote:

truelgbt wrote:

laklak wrote:

truelgbt wrote:

Introducing any substance that is a product or byproduct of DNA is clearly a big no-no for origin-of-life experiments.

It's clearly not.

Wrong. Methane clearly is a product of life/DNA:

Methane is found on most planets of the solar system, several satelites including the Moon (as outgas from the surface), Halley's Comet and Comet Hyakutake , the exoplanet HD 189733 b, the atmospheres of M-type stars, and in interstellar clouds.

For example, in the USA, what percent of methane is DNA-produced and what percent is not? Please be honest.

This quick info is all over the net:
What is the largest source of methane gas?
Agricultural sources. Livestock management—including emissions from enteric fermentation (67 percent) and management of animal waste (27 percent)—accounts for the largest share of U.S. methane emissions from agricultural activities.

Hence, the Miller-Urey experiment relied largely on DNA products of LIFE to try and produce life....this is called STACKING THE DECK heavily in favor of the 'researchers' if they be called that. Cheaters. An illegitimate experiment IMO.

Am I a skeptic of this type of bullshit? Hell yeah, and so should everybody else who is truly skeptical of such poorly designed work.

Someone do a better job next time. Thank you.