Posted: May 17, 2018 10:06 pm
Xerographica wrote:...
I think it's useful to be able to compare your rankings with our rankings. Assuming, of course, that our rankings accurately reflect our true priorities/preferences.
Nope, you've lost me completely here. Let's say your rankings were skeptic a, skeptic b and skeptic c each had 33% of the total vote whilst our rankings had 1 cent donation for skeptic q, $1 donation for skeptic r and $1Million donation for skeptic s.
A) How do you validate your stated assumption and B) how do the rankings compare? (Hint: They don't.)