rationalskepticism.org

Xerographica wrote:

Thommo wrote:I said experimental controls not a control group (which is only one type of experimental control).

Simply saying "experimental controls" really isn't useful. Try making specific suggestions as to how the experiment could have been improved.

I did, at great length. You completely ignored it. I'm not going to repeat myself, you can just refer back to the previous conversation, it's still there.

Xerographica wrote:

Thommo wrote:But seriously, since it's now been shown that even for you nothing as at stake with this "experiment", why are you even carrying on? Your bluff's been called and you didn't change your mind. That's the end of it.

I said that my belief would be falsified if voting ranked the Wealth of Nations higher than donating did. In case you missed it, voting is one person one vote, which isn't what happened in that thread.

You said the experiment had the potential to change your mind. I told you that you were having a laugh. Again, it's all there in black and white if you want to go look.

We now know who was right.