rationalskepticism.org

jamest wrote:

BlackBart wrote:

jamest wrote:The simple fact is that you're accusing me of me being drunk when my posts here tonight have been intelligent and devoid of grammatical flaw throughout.

That should be 'flaws' james.

I'm not sure that I agree, since when used as an index of the whole, the single parameter shoud apply.

'Should'*. It doesn't matter. Your posts are in fact littered with grammatical and other errors (I highlighted another for you above), so it's really not helpful for you to use their supposed absence as proof that you weren't drunk. When you come back, try hard to do better.