Posted: Mar 29, 2020 5:46 am
by Cito di Pense
Hermit wrote:
tuco wrote:
Hermit wrote:
tuco wrote:Yes, that could, in principle, produce data with some interest to interpret them.

Not really. In a group steered by a market, the decision to ban somebody would be made by whoever has the most money. And that is how things will pan out in real world scenarios where decisions are made using money contributions.


Not really.

And in a market the group's direction is determined by spenders.

Spenders directly imply more than one. Then it's reasonable to assume that "determined by spenders share" applies.

So far, so good. Now look up 'oligarchy'. No, wait. I'll save you the effort: "a small group of people having control of a country or organization."


:evilgrin:

:thumbup:

:cheers: