:popcorn:
Moderators: kiore, Blip, The_Metatron
laklak wrote:No you can't.
That's not an argument; it's just contradiction.laklak wrote:No you can't.
Well, the way I've had it told, mathematical physics kicks off in order to predict the motions of the wandering stars (*), and the only people really interested in that were the members of the Catholic Church trying to figure out how to accurately date Easter or something.Hobbes Choice wrote:It's worth pointing our out to all you skeptics, that astrology was an accepted science for thousands of years, dating back to old Babylon,, moving to the Roman empire and thriving and being an established belief system deep into the Englightenment.
Though suffering challenges along the way, as we witness in Shakespeare for example, some of Europe's greatest astronomers were primarily astrologers, and the most important reason for understanding the stars was for the purpose of prediction; Galileo, Newton, Kepler and others all held this as an indelible assumption of reality.
History is littered with dead sciences, and I do not suppose our current way of thinking is immune to the same attrition.
laklak wrote:People don't want to be responsible for their own fate, it's easier to blame The Planets or malign spirits than to blame themselves.
Scarlett and Ironclad wrote:Campermon,...a middle aged, middle class, Guardian reading, dad of four, knackered hippy, woolly jumper wearing wino and science teacher.
Another story I have is that before Newton, everyone thought the heavens were a distinct reality from the Earth, obeying their own laws. Maybe it's easier to imagine weird influences between the two spheres in that case. Attached is one of my favourite medieval pictures.laklak wrote:People don't want to be responsible for their own fate, it's easier to blame The Planets or malign spirits than to blame themselves.
Scarlett and Ironclad wrote:Campermon,...a middle aged, middle class, Guardian reading, dad of four, knackered hippy, woolly jumper wearing wino and science teacher.
VazScep wrote:Well, the way I've had it told, mathematical physics kicks off in order to predict the motions of the wandering stars (*), and the only people really interested in that were the members of the Catholic Church trying to figure out how to accurately date Easter or something.Hobbes Choice wrote:It's worth pointing our out to all you skeptics, that astrology was an accepted science for thousands of years, dating back to old Babylon,, moving to the Roman empire and thriving and being an established belief system deep into the Englightenment.
Though suffering challenges along the way, as we witness in Shakespeare for example, some of Europe's greatest astronomers were primarily astrologers, and the most important reason for understanding the stars was for the purpose of prediction; Galileo, Newton, Kepler and others all held this as an indelible assumption of reality.
History is littered with dead sciences, and I do not suppose our current way of thinking is immune to the same attrition.
Onyx8 wrote:3, and I'm a Cancer.
Hobbes Choice wrote:Old English, from Latin, ‘crab or creeping ulcer’, translating Greek karkinos, said to have been applied to such tumours because the swollen veins around them resembled the limbs of a crab. canker was the usual form until the 17th century
Hobbes Choice wrote:Everyone except 13,11, and 3, I think.
•We are born at a given moment in a given place and like vintage years of wine we have the qualities of the year and of the season in which we are born. Astrology does not lay claim to anything else. - C.G.Jung
•Astrology is one of the intuitive methods like the I Ching, geomantics, and other divinatory procedures. It is based upon the synchronicity principle, i.e. meaningful coincidence. ... Astrology is a naively projected psychology in which the different attitudes and temperaments of man are represented as gods and identified with planets and zodiacal constellations. - Carl Gustav Jung
•The starry vault of heaven is in truth the open book of cosmic projection, in which are reflected the mythologems, i.e., the archetypes. In this vision astrology and alchemy, the two classical functionaries of the psychology of the collective unconscious, join hands. - Carl .G. Jung
•Astrology is of particular interest to the psychologist, since it contains a sort of psychological experience which we call projected - this means that we find the psychological facts as it were in the constellations. This originally gave rise to the idea that these factors derive from the stars, whereas they are merely in a relation of synchronicity with them. I admit that this is a very curious fact which throws a peculiar light on the structure of the human mind. .... Carl G. Jung in 1947 in a letter to prof. B.V. Raman
•So far as the personality is still potential, it can be called transcendent, and so far as it is unconscious, it is indistinguishable from all those things that carry its projections...[that is,] symbols of the outside world and the cosmic symbols. These form the psychological basis for the conception of man as a macrocosm through the astrological components of his character. - Carl G. Jung
•Astrologers are influenced by theosophy, so they say, "That is very simple, it is just vibration!" ... But what is vibration? They say it is light energy, perhaps electricity, they are not quite informed. At all events the vibrations that could influence us have never been seen, so it remains just a word. - Carl G. Jung in 1929
Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest