DraftScience

Physics n' stuff

Discussions on astrology, homeopathy and superstition etc.

Moderators: Calilasseia, DarthHelmet86, Onyx8

DraftScience

#1  Postby JustStarDust » Jul 13, 2020 7:00 pm

This guy has some very interesting theories. He's crude, swears a lot. I hate him, I love him.

https://www.youtube.com/user/DraftScience



I've known of this guy for ages, since the Stickam days. He has another channel which discusses human life in general, but I won't go there in this thread.
I do not totally understand every theory he presents, and I'm not trying to say 'believe him' blah blah blah. So why am I even posting this? Idk, delete it if you want. Why do anything?

His main theory is that the double slit experiment is wrong, and most of our current physics beliefs, are wrong. He wants to find out the truth and win a Nobel peace prize. People keep telling him that everything has been proven, and he's just a dumb ass or whatever. And maybe he is.

There's a huge list of stuff that physacitits haven't figured out yet. Maybe, he can. Maybe he can't, but he can try.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_u ... in_physics
Avoid nasty drugs.
User avatar
JustStarDust
THREAD STARTER
 
Name: NotTellingYouThatSorry
Posts: 258

Country: NotTellingYouThatSorry
Marshall Island (mh)
Print view this post

Ads by Google


Re: DraftScience

#2  Postby theropod_V_2.0 » Jul 13, 2020 7:12 pm

:rofl:

RS
“Sleeping in the hen house doesn’t make you a chicken”.
User avatar
theropod_V_2.0
 
Name: R.A.
Posts: 738

Country: USA
United States (us)
Print view this post

Re: DraftScience

#3  Postby campermon » Jul 13, 2020 7:26 pm

theropod_V_2.0 wrote::rofl:

RS


i fancy a pint

:beercheers:
Scarlett and Ironclad wrote:Campermon,...a middle aged, middle class, Guardian reading, dad of four, knackered hippy, woolly jumper wearing wino and science teacher.
User avatar
campermon
RS Donator
 
Posts: 17430
Age: 50
Male

United Kingdom (uk)
Print view this post

Re: DraftScience

#4  Postby newolder » Jul 13, 2020 7:28 pm

His main theory is that the double slit experiment is wrong


Few of these words mean what you think they mean and you spelt "Daft" wrong in your topic title.

Can a moderator move this fuckwittery to "Pseudoscience", please?
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould
User avatar
newolder
 
Name: Albert Ross
Posts: 7308
Male

Country: Feudal Estate number 9
Print view this post

Re: DraftScience

#5  Postby theropod_V_2.0 » Jul 13, 2020 7:35 pm

Again,

:rofl:

That last pipe hit was one too many...(not really).

RS
“Sleeping in the hen house doesn’t make you a chicken”.
User avatar
theropod_V_2.0
 
Name: R.A.
Posts: 738

Country: USA
United States (us)
Print view this post

Re: DraftScience

#6  Postby Macdoc » Jul 13, 2020 7:44 pm

Hunh - here I was going to suggest DaftScience .. :roll:
Travel photos > https://500px.com/macdoc/galleries
EO Wilson in On Human Nature wrote:
We are not compelled to believe in biological uniformity in order to affirm human freedom and dignity.
User avatar
Macdoc
 
Posts: 17156
Age: 73
Male

Country: Canada/Australia
Australia (au)
Print view this post

Re: DraftScience

#7  Postby Blackadder » Jul 13, 2020 7:53 pm

His main theory is that the double slit experiment is wrong, and most of our current physics beliefs, are wrong


1. He doesn’t have a theory. He has beliefs.
2. Physics doesn’t have beliefs. It has theories.
3. Learn the fucking difference. It’s important.
4. Any shitforbrains can go around saying everything scientists know about X “is wrong”. In fact such statements are highly correlated with being a shitforbrains in the first place.
5. Data. Evidence. Reasoning. Demonstrable conclusion. Either you’ve got them or all you’ve got is hot smelly air emanating from your asshole. This chap appears to have the latter.

I don’t think you understand any of this, unfortunately.
That credulity should be gross in proportion to the ignorance of the mind that it enslaves, is in strict consistency with the principle of human nature. - Percy Bysshe Shelley
User avatar
Blackadder
RS Donator
 
Posts: 3748
Male

United Kingdom (uk)
Print view this post

Ads by Google


Re: DraftScience

#8  Postby laklak » Jul 13, 2020 8:13 pm

Any time the word "Dubunked" is in the title I skip the video. Same if scientists are "shocked!" or "don't want you to know", or if I've been "doing it wrong the whole time".

Idiots are attracted by that sort of language, apparently.
A man who carries a cat by the tail learns something he can learn in no other way. - Mark Twain
The sky is falling! The sky is falling! - Chicken Little
I never go without my dinner. No one ever does, except vegetarians and people like that - Oscar Wilde
User avatar
laklak
RS Donator
 
Name: Florida Man
Posts: 20770
Age: 66
Male

Country: The Great Satan
Swaziland (sz)
Print view this post

Re: DraftScience

#9  Postby Hermit » Jul 13, 2020 8:22 pm

Won't be long before JSD brings up Time Cube.
God is the mysterious veil under which we hide our ignorance of the cause. - Léo Errera


God created the universe
God just exists
User avatar
Hermit
 
Posts: 4022
Age: 67
Male

Print view this post

Re: DraftScience

#10  Postby BlackBart » Jul 13, 2020 8:28 pm

10 Post random Youtube video
20 Waffle
30 Goto 10

Trollbot programming 101.
You don't crucify people! Not on Good Friday! - Harold Shand
User avatar
BlackBart
 
Name: rotten bart
Posts: 12155
Age: 58
Male

United Kingdom (uk)
Print view this post

Re: DraftScience

#11  Postby campermon » Jul 13, 2020 8:31 pm

BlackBart wrote:10 Post random Youtube video
20 Waffle
30 Goto 10

Trollbot programming 101.


Yes.

Mind you, its given me a great idea for a beer brand; 'DraughtScience'.

:cheers:
Scarlett and Ironclad wrote:Campermon,...a middle aged, middle class, Guardian reading, dad of four, knackered hippy, woolly jumper wearing wino and science teacher.
User avatar
campermon
RS Donator
 
Posts: 17430
Age: 50
Male

United Kingdom (uk)
Print view this post

Re: DraftScience

#12  Postby BlackBart » Jul 13, 2020 8:40 pm

:beercheers: I'll drink to that
Image

:drunk:
You don't crucify people! Not on Good Friday! - Harold Shand
User avatar
BlackBart
 
Name: rotten bart
Posts: 12155
Age: 58
Male

United Kingdom (uk)
Print view this post

Re: DraftScience

#13  Postby newolder » Jul 13, 2020 8:44 pm

campermon wrote:
BlackBart wrote:10 Post random Youtube video
20 Waffle
30 Goto 10

Trollbot programming 101.


Yes.

Mind you, its given me a great idea for a beer brand; 'DraughtScience'.

:cheers:


Sold in bottles as "Fluid Dynamics", with an alcohol free version "Hydrodynamics"?
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould
User avatar
newolder
 
Name: Albert Ross
Posts: 7308
Male

Country: Feudal Estate number 9
Print view this post

Re: DraftScience

#14  Postby felltoearth » Jul 13, 2020 8:54 pm

theropod_V_2.0 wrote:Again,

:rofl:

That last pipe hit was one too many...(not really).

RS


56B9F2A5-011F-47FC-AA20-1F4D93A82F19.gif
56B9F2A5-011F-47FC-AA20-1F4D93A82F19.gif (843.05 KiB) Viewed 487 times
"Walla Walla Bonga!" — Witticism
User avatar
felltoearth
 
Posts: 13727
Age: 53

Canada (ca)
Print view this post

Re: DraftScience

#15  Postby JustStarDust » Jul 14, 2020 12:22 am

Blackadder wrote:
His main theory is that the double slit experiment is wrong, and most of our current physics beliefs, are wrong


1. He doesn’t have a theory. He has beliefs.
2. Physics doesn’t have beliefs. It has theories.
3. Learn the fucking difference. It’s important.
4. Any shitforbrains can go around saying everything scientists know about X “is wrong”. In fact such statements are highly correlated with being a shitforbrains in the first place.
5. Data. Evidence. Reasoning. Demonstrable conclusion. Either you’ve got them or all you’ve got is hot smelly air emanating from your asshole. This chap appears to have the latter.

I don’t think you understand any of this, unfortunately.


Chilladder (that could be a beer too)
Avoid nasty drugs.
User avatar
JustStarDust
THREAD STARTER
 
Name: NotTellingYouThatSorry
Posts: 258

Country: NotTellingYouThatSorry
Marshall Island (mh)
Print view this post

Ads by Google


Re: DraftScience

#16  Postby Svartalf » Jul 14, 2020 6:25 am

Hermit wrote:Won't be long before JSD brings up Time Cube.

man, did you have to raise that shit, now my mouth tastes bitter and I want a way to the nule codes...
PC stands for Patronizing Cocksucker Randy Ping

Embrace the Dark Side, it needs a hug
User avatar
Svartalf
 
Posts: 2425
Age: 50
Male

Country: France
European Union (eur)
Print view this post

Re: DraftScience

#17  Postby Svartalf » Jul 14, 2020 6:26 am

campermon wrote:
BlackBart wrote:10 Post random Youtube video
20 Waffle
30 Goto 10

Trollbot programming 101.


Yes.

Mind you, its given me a great idea for a beer brand; 'DraughtScience'.

:cheers:

I'd taste that
PC stands for Patronizing Cocksucker Randy Ping

Embrace the Dark Side, it needs a hug
User avatar
Svartalf
 
Posts: 2425
Age: 50
Male

Country: France
European Union (eur)
Print view this post

Re: DraftScience

#18  Postby JustStarDust » Jul 14, 2020 11:59 am

Blackadder wrote:
His main theory is that the double slit experiment is wrong, and most of our current physics beliefs, are wrong


1. He doesn’t have a theory. He has beliefs.
2. Physics doesn’t have beliefs. It has theories.
3. Learn the fucking difference. It’s important.
4. Any shitforbrains can go around saying everything scientists know about X “is wrong”. In fact such statements are highly correlated with being a shitforbrains in the first place.
5. Data. Evidence. Reasoning. Demonstrable conclusion. Either you’ve got them or all you’ve got is hot smelly air emanating from your asshole. This chap appears to have the latter.

I don’t think you understand any of this, unfortunately.


Ok ok but, You knew what I meant. And the various 'theories' already exist. He's basically just looking for holes in the theory. He's made quite a few videos. Have you seen many of them? I haven't seen him do experiments. I do remember one time when he was tying to setup a laser in the forest of Mendham NJ & test something.
He has every right, to question this stuff. And no, felltoearth - as far as I know he is drug free. He vapes occasionally, and I'm not even sure if that has nicotine in it, or if it does - what mg.

8-)
Avoid nasty drugs.
User avatar
JustStarDust
THREAD STARTER
 
Name: NotTellingYouThatSorry
Posts: 258

Country: NotTellingYouThatSorry
Marshall Island (mh)
Print view this post

Re: DraftScience

#19  Postby newolder » Jul 14, 2020 1:10 pm

JustStarDust wrote:... He's basically just looking for holes in the theory.
...


Can you write down an equation or two for this theory so that we could see if or where any holes may be lurking?
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould
User avatar
newolder
 
Name: Albert Ross
Posts: 7308
Male

Country: Feudal Estate number 9
Print view this post

Re: DraftScience

#20  Postby JustStarDust » Jul 14, 2020 1:18 pm

Nope, sorry. I don't want to misrepresent. #homework?
No pressure. If he's a waste of time for you, then ignore the thread?
Avoid nasty drugs.
User avatar
JustStarDust
THREAD STARTER
 
Name: NotTellingYouThatSorry
Posts: 258

Country: NotTellingYouThatSorry
Marshall Island (mh)
Print view this post

Next

Return to Pseudoscience

Who is online

Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest