JustStarDust wrote:DraftScience, is different.

Yes. It's pseudoscience.

JustStarDust wrote:

SuspiciousObservers, was the channel about space science. How was his information, pseudoscience? All he does is report space science. DraftScience, is different.

You’ve only posted D(r)aftScience in this thread so I don’t know what you’re referring to.

JustStarDust wrote:...
SuspiciousObservers, was the channel about space science. How was his information, pseudoscience? All he does is report space science.

There is no "SuspiciousObservers" because that topic's pseudo-title is Suspicious0bservers, where O (cap. o) is replaced with 0 (the symbol for zero).

DraftScience, is different.

The daftness is clear.

felltoearth wrote:

JustStarDust wrote:

SuspiciousObservers, was the channel about space science. How was his information, pseudoscience? All he does is report space science. DraftScience, is different.

You’ve only posted D(r)aftScience in this thread so I don’t know what you’re referring to.

Oh well.

newolder wrote:

JustStarDust wrote:...
SuspiciousObservers, was the channel about space science. How was his information, pseudoscience? All he does is report space science.

There is no "SuspiciousObservers" because that topic's pseudo-title is Suspicious0bservers, where O (cap. o) is replaced with 0 (the symbol for zero).

DraftScience, is different.

The daftness is clear.

Did you see the video where he talks about this forum? Not that it matters too much.

http://www.rationalskepticism.org/pseud ... 56726.html

I don't see how "suspicious0bservers" content, is "pseudoscience". If you honestly believe that, then are you also saying that the data he gets from NASA, etc, is pseudoscience?

JustStarDust wrote:...

newolder wrote:

JustStarDust wrote:...
SuspiciousObservers, was the channel about space science. How was his information, pseudoscience? All he does is report space science.

There is no "SuspiciousObservers" because that topic's pseudo-title is Suspicious0bservers, where O (cap. o) is replaced with 0 (the symbol for zero).

DraftScience, is different.

The daftness is clear.

Did you see the video where he talks about this forum? Not that it matters too much.

No, I did not see that video. If it matters that much, I'll keep it that way.

http://www.rationalskepticism.org/pseud ... 56726.html

I don't see how "suspicious0bservers" content, is "pseudoscience". If you honestly believe that, then are you also saying that the data he gets from NASA, etc, is pseudoscience?

Where did I say that the content is pseudoscience? From what I recall of that video it wibbled about the recent history of Solar activity and some of its impacts on the Earth. I don't recall any scientific content though but that's not the subject matter of this topic. [/off topic]

newolder wrote:

JustStarDust wrote:...

newolder wrote:

JustStarDust wrote:...
SuspiciousObservers, was the channel about space science. How was his information, pseudoscience? All he does is report space science.

There is no "SuspiciousObservers" because that topic's pseudo-title is Suspicious0bservers, where O (cap. o) is replaced with 0 (the symbol for zero).

DraftScience, is different.

The daftness is clear.

Did you see the video where he talks about this forum? Not that it matters too much.

No, I did not see that video. If it matters that much, I'll keep it that way.

http://www.rationalskepticism.org/pseud ... 56726.html

I don't see how "suspicious0bservers" content, is "pseudoscience". If you honestly believe that, then are you also saying that the data he gets from NASA, etc, is pseudoscience?

Where did I say that the content is pseudoscience? From what I recall of that video it wibbled about the recent history of Solar activity and some of its impacts on the Earth. I don't recall any scientific content though but that's not the subject matter of this topic. [/off topic]

I was just asking why it was moved. Not directly to you. Sorry for being confusing. 'Wibbled'? Strange. The other videos discuss more science and data readings - pretty important stuff imo. It might be a good thing is a CME took out all electronics on Earth (no no, that would be horrible).

Here's the video that mentions the forum. Don't take it personal. DraftScience is just a little bit jaded after all of the hell he's been through. He's as 'tough as nails', and I tend to see some similarity between some users here and DS.

JustStarDust wrote:...

Here's the video that mentions the forum.

...

You mean the video that doesn't matter and I previously wrote that I won't watch? How trollish.

newolder wrote:

JustStarDust wrote:...

Here's the video that mentions the forum.

...

You mean the video that doesn't matter and I previously wrote that I won't watch? How trollish.

Yep. I don't really care if you watch it or not. Others may like to see it. And at least it's 'on topic' as to not confuse you.

Are you a selfish troll?

JustStarDust wrote:...

Yep. I don't really care if you watch it or not. Others may like to see it. And at least it's 'on topic' as to not confuse you.

Are you a selfish troll?

Posting links and tubes without further discussion is your preferred method so here's another to share around: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1204.4616.pdf

Goodbye.

newolder wrote:

JustStarDust wrote:...

Yep. I don't really care if you watch it or not. Others may like to see it. And at least it's 'on topic' as to not confuse you.

Are you a selfish troll?

Posting links and tubes without further discussion is your preferred method so here's another to share around: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1204.4616.pdf

Goodbye.

Thank you. That might be an interesting read. It's good to actually discuss things. I might even pass it on.

dissing Newolder is on a par with prodding a mod. You had a chance to learn something and fucked it up.
Get your common sense together or continue to suffer the "slings and arrows" of virulent distain you've earned so far.

Macdoc wrote:dissing Newolder is on a par with prodding a mod. You had a chance to learn something and fucked it up.
Get your common sense together or continue to suffer the "slings and arrows" of virulent distain you've earned so far.

If you think I dissed, or prodded, that's your opinion. I don't mind 'suffering' these 'slings and arrows', it's not that bad

Boy you sure complain about it a lot for someone who allegedly doesn’t mind.

He's offering money for a debate / discussion.



Or is this some kind of ruse for more subs? Idk, I tend to think he wants an actual discussion. Anyone here interested? Go for it.

Why don’t you, since you’re the only one who cares?

laklak wrote:Any time the word "Dubunked" is in the title I skip the video. Same if scientists are "shocked!" or "don't want you to know", or if I've been "doing it wrong the whole time".

Idiots are attracted by that sort of language, apparently.

'Science Can't Explain (whatever)' is one that raises my hackles.

Yeah, I can get that, I mean, there ARE things which still are beyond the understanding of modern science... unfortunately the delusion trolls seldom refer to such in their silly videos.