Arthur Methoxy wrote:
So "bullshit" is a phrase that describes a literary output? and never refers to the mind-set of the author?
Hmm. That must mean that anything is possible. What do others think?

Arthur Methoxy wrote:
Other interested readers please note that as my original post was bullshit (pseudoscience), and/or pseudoscience (bullshit), then I'm not up to being forced to having a polite conversation about it, even if it was logically possible, which it isn't, because it is pseudoscience.

Thomas Eshuis wrote:

stijndeloose wrote:Oh look at you all brave and valiant now that you have a king again, for the first time in 176 years.

At least we have a likeable king.

Arthur Methoxy wrote:Update: Readers please note that I was, and still am, unable to respond to any questions on my original post as the final adjudication on it was made when it was put into pseudophilosophy.

It would have been better for arguments to be presented on either side before adjudication was made, but the decision has been made. I would strongly advise everyone to respect that decision.

!

GENERAL MODNOTE Just to make this absolutely clear. Moving threads from one section to another is a matter of forum housekeeping, of trying to place a discussion within an appropriate context for its subject matter. It is NOT an 'adjudication' on the content or arguments of a thread-starting post, nor should it be taken to be one, nor does it place any specific limits on how or what people discuss thereafter (beyond the usual conditions of the Forum Users' Agreement of course).