Arthur Methoxy wrote:
So "bullshit" is a phrase that describes a literary output? and never refers to the mind-set of the author?
Hmm. That must mean that anything is possible. What do others think?
I think you have no idea what "must" means.
Try reading the posts that people write for once. They refer to your post, not to you. Now, can you dispense with the silly butt-hurt and get to defending your OP if you've any defense at all?
Arthur Methoxy wrote:
Other interested readers please note that as my original post was bullshit (pseudoscience), and/or pseudoscience (bullshit), then I'm not up to being forced to having a polite conversation about it, even if it was logically possible, which it isn't, because it is pseudoscience.
Nobody gives a shit if you're polite or not. At this point nobody cares if you can or will defend your OP, because it's clear you're incapable of doing so. I'm glad you accept that your OP has no logical defense, I appreciate you admitting my original response (which I made well before the thread was moved to pseudoscience) was correct