2.5 Gap numbers
4/.5/3/.5/2 - my notation
current math notation -[math]x\in(0,4)\cup(9,12)\cup(17,19)

2.8. The opposite number
4/.5/3/.5/2[math]\fbox{s} 0/.4/5/.3/5/.2/0
4/.5/3/.5/2 s.={4/.5/3/.5/2 , 0/.4/5/.3/5/.2/0} -my notation
current math notation -
[math]x_1\in(0,4)\cup(9,12)\cup(17,19)gg[math]x_2\in(0,0)\cup(4,9)\cup(12,17)\cup(19,19)

character (instead gg) to select x1 opposite x2 ?
cc={ [math]x_1\in(0,4)\cup(9,12)\cup(17,19),[math]x_2\in(0,0)\cup(4,9)\cup(12,17)\cup(19,19)}
what represents (cc) if we use the current math notation ?
2.10 Adding
my notation

current math notation
cc={ [math]x_1\in(0,4)\cup(9,12)\cup(17,19),[math]x_2\in(0,0)\cup(4,9)\cup(12,17)\cup(19,19)}
cs={ [math]x_3\in(0,7)\cup(8,9),[math]x_4\in(0,0)\cup(7,8)\cup(9,9)}
cc+[7]cs=ss
ss={[math]x_5\in(0,4)\cup(7,14)\cup(15,16)\cup(17,19,[math]x_6\in(0,4)\cup(9,12)\cup(15,16)\cup(17,19),x7=13,,[math]x_8\in(0,5)\cup(8,13)}
how to write with the current math +[7]?

ms.srki wrote:2.5 Gap numbers
4/.5/3/.5/2 - my notation
current math notation -[math]x\in(0,4)\cup(9,12)\cup(17,19)

2.8. The opposite number
4/.5/3/.5/2[math]\fbox{s} 0/.4/5/.3/5/.2/0
4/.5/3/.5/2 s.={4/.5/3/.5/2 , 0/.4/5/.3/5/.2/0} -my notation
current math notation -
[math]x_1\in(0,4)\cup(9,12)\cup(17,19)gg[math]x_2\in(0,0)\cup(4,9)\cup(12,17)\cup(19,19)

character (instead gg) to select x1 opposite x2 ?
cc={ [math]x_1\in(0,4)\cup(9,12)\cup(17,19),[math]x_2\in(0,0)\cup(4,9)\cup(12,17)\cup(19,19)}
what represents (cc) if we use the current math notation ?
2.10 Adding
my notation

http://www.png

current math notation
cc={ [math]x_1\in(0,4)\cup(9,12)\cup(17,19),[math]x_2\in(0,0)\cup(4,9)\cup(12,17)\cup(19,19)}
cs={ [math]x_3\in(0,7)\cup(8,9),[math]x_4\in(0,0)\cup(7,8)\cup(9,9)}
cc+[7]cs=ss
ss={[math]x_5\in(0,4)\cup(7,14)\cup(15,16)\cup(17,19,[math]x_6\in(0,4)\cup(9,12)\cup(15,16)\cup(17,19),x7=13,,[math]x_8\in(0,5)\cup(8,13)}
how to write with the current math +[7]?

Did you read my post? NOBODY UNDERSTANDS WHAT YOU ARE GETTING AT! You might as well be talking to yourself. Take a couple of posts and explain what all this is meant to be.

Rhubis wrote:

Did you read my post? NOBODY UNDERSTANDS WHAT YOU ARE GETTING AT! You might as well be talking to yourself. Take a couple of posts and explain what all this is meant to be.

I think that the complex mathematical language is urging members to have a beer. It will certainly help with the understanding.


edit - PS where is Scar with that callsign when you need him?!

ms.srki wrote:2.5 Gap numbers
4/.5/3/.5/2 - my notation
current math notation -[math]x\in(0,4)\cup(9,12)\cup(17,19)

2.8. The opposite number
4/.5/3/.5/2[math]\fbox{s} 0/.4/5/.3/5/.2/0
4/.5/3/.5/2 s.={4/.5/3/.5/2 , 0/.4/5/.3/5/.2/0} -my notation
current math notation -
[math]x_1\in(0,4)\cup(9,12)\cup(17,19)gg[math]x_2\in(0,0)\cup(4,9)\cup(12,17)\cup(19,19)

What is [latex}(a,b)[/latex] here? The closed interval, the open interval? That you do take a union for [math](a,a) type of statements suggests closed intervals (else these would be empty), but this also means that the interval boundaries are included in both sets.

Now, of course you can argue that for some specific measures, these are nullsets and then define an equivalence relation, so [math](a,b) is an interval that can be either open or closed (but again, then the ones containing a single element are equivalent to the empty set).

Another issue here is that you talk about numbers, but they appear to be sets. The way you write it ([math]x \in ... makes x a number, but your opwerations seem to affect sets rather than specific numbers).

A way to invert sets is to use the set difference operator: [math][\min(A),\max(a)]/A
However for this operation it does make a difference whether these are open or closed intervals.

I use a notebook in the box, there is a grid, and this work (kn (k-step, n-number of steps))
k1 - ask a numeric semi line

k2-natural numbers conversion in geometric form and sequence of units (not represent a binary number)

k3-converting gap in the number of geometric form and sequence of ones and zeros (not pose a binary number). general form of emptiness:
a / .b / c
a / .b / d / .e / c
a / .b / d / .e / f / .g / c
...
(a and c) the external number of vacancies they may be {0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7, ...}, the other numbers are the inner emptiness of those can be {1,2,3, 4,5,6,7, ...}

k4 - opposite numbers, geometric basis - instead of 1 set to 0, instead of 0 to 1 sets
example, the number 7 (its opposite is 0/.7/0). 2/.2/2 (its opposite is 0/.2/2/.2/0)


k5 - the calculation, the general form aw [q] b = c, first number-a, second number-b,c- one or more
solution calculation, w-calculation, [g]-a place where it happens the calculation
(refers to (a) number)
Addition - 1 exist in the a or b (2/.2/4 + [1] 3/.3/2 =9)
, 2 +2 = 4 (addition to current mathematics)

k6-function opposite number - because each has its opposite number, the general form
as.w [q] b = c, a w [q] bs. = c, as.w [q] bs. = c, (s.-tag number which has its opposite number)
k7-Subtraction - one can only be in (a-yes ,b - not), or in the (b -yes ,a - not),
2/.2/4-[1]3/.3/2=1/.1/5/.1/1 , current subtraction 5-2=3

k7-Subtraction - 1 can only be in (a-yes ,b - not), or in the (b -yes ,a - not),
2/.2/4-[1]3/.3/2=1/.1/5/.1/1 , current subtraction 5-2=3

Wow! I don't understand what the fuck this is all about, but I'm pretty sure this guy is on to something.

iamthereforeithink wrote:Wow! I don't understand what the fuck this is all about, but I'm pretty sure this guy is on something.

FIFY

k7-subtraction - there is only 1 u a (b - not), or just u b (a -not),
2/.2/4- [1] = 3/.3/2 1/.1/5/.1/1, current subtraction 5-2 = 3

The way this is going, it seems that you are defining sequences of boolean variables and so far all binary operations are pairwise boolean operators.
I.e. you have
[math]\begin{eqnarray} a_i \in \{T,F\}; b_i \in \{T,F\}; i \in A \\
( \neg a)_i := \neg (a_i) \\
(a+b)_i := a_i \vee b_i \\
(a-b)_i := a_i \veebar b_i\\ \end{eqnarray}

What makes this a new thing? If you want to fling binary strings at logical gates there´s an entire branch of maths devoted to it (and as a practical results of this we have digital computers). I´d also note that that field has rather effective ways of notation - I doubt using what´s pretty much a compression algorithm to recode binary strings as sequences of integers is all that useful. It´s akin to suggesting rather than opening a txt in an editor, we should zip it and open the archive in the editor... There are obvious reasons nobody does that.

Ah, so this is based on the box scores, by innings, for some imagined baseball game? Maybe for match play golf? Perhaps coin flipping?

RS

k8-contrast subtraction - 1 is the same in both a and b, there is at present
mathematics.
2/.2/4[math]\fbox{-} [1]3/.3/2=1/.5/1

k9-gap addition - 0 u a or u b there does not exist in the current mathematics
2/.4/2 [math]\fbox{+} [1]3/.3/2=0/.5/0

k10-gap subtraction - 0 there exists u a (b-no) or u b (a-no), does not exist in the current mathematics
2/.4/2[math]\fbox{ -.} [1]3/.3/2=0/.2/2/.1/0

----------
2.14 Gap add "2.10"
Theorem - Gap is added between two gap number.

EVIDENCE - 1/.2/1 [math]\fbox{+}[0 ]0/.1/1/.1/0=0/.3/0 or
1/.2/1 [math]\fbox{+} [.3]0/.1/1/.1/0=0/.3/0
1..
1/.2/1 [math]\fbox{+} [1]0/.1/1/.170=0/.1/1/.2/0 or
1/.2/1 [math]\fbox{+} [.2]0/.1/1/.1/0=0/.1/1/.2/0
2..
1/.2/1 [math]\fbox{+} [2]0/.1/1/.1/0=0/.1/1/.3/0 or
1/.2/1 [math]\fbox{+} [.1]0/.1/1/.1/0=0/.1/1/.3/0
3..
1/.2/1 [math]\fbox{+} [3]0/.1/1/.1/0=0/.1/1/.1/1/.2/0 or
1/.2/1[math]\fbox{+} [.0]0/.1/1/.1/0=0/.1/1/.1/1/.2/0
4..
The general form a [math]\fbox{+} [q]=c or a [math]\fbox{+} [.q]=c.
The general form in opposite numbers
5..

-----------
2.15 subtract gap "2.14"
Theorem - The addition of a gap relationship where the gaps are merging, this relationship is deleted, leaving the rest.
EVIDENCE - 1/.2/1[math]\fbox{-.} [0 ]0/.1/1/.1/0=0/.2/0or
1/.2/1 [math]\fbox{-.} [.3]0/.1/1/.1/0=0/.2/0
1..
1/.2/1[math]\fbox{-.} [1]0/.1/1/.1/0=0/.1/2/.1/0 or
1/.2/1 [math]\fbox{-.} [.2]0/.1/1/.1/0=0/.1/2/.1/0
2..
1/.2/1 [math]\fbox{-.} [2]0/.1/1/.1/0=0/.1/1/.3/0 or
1/.2/1 [math]\fbox{-.} [.1]0/.1/1/.1/0=0/.1/1/.3/0
3..
1/.2/1 [math]\fbox{-.} [3]0/.1/1/.1/0=0/.1/1/.1/1/.2/0 or
1/.2/1 [math]\fbox{-.} [.0]0/.1/1/.1/0=0/.1/1/.1/1/.2/0
4..
The general form a[math]\fbox{-.} [q]=c ili a [math]\fbox{-.} [.q]=c.
The general form of the opposite numbers.
5..

--------
Comparability of the two mathematics ( down what is given of the current mathematics)
gap add - no
subtract gap - no

2.16 gap contrary subtract"2.14"
Theorem - The addition of a relationship gaps where gaps together, he remains, the rest is deleted.

Evidence - - 1/.2/1 [math]\fbox{-/}[3]0/.1/1/./0=0/.1/0 or
1/.2/1[math]\fbox{-/} [.0]0/.1/1/./0=0/.1/0

1/.2/1[math]\fbox{-/} [2]0/.1/1/./0=0/.1/0 or
1/.2/1[math]\fbox{-/} [.1]0/.1/1/./0=0/.1/0

1/.2/1 [math]\fbox{-/} [1]0/.1/1/./0=0 or
1/.2/1[math]\fbox{-/} [.2]0/.1/1/./0=0

1/.2/1 [math]\fbox{-/} [0 ]0/.1/1/./0=0 or
1/.2/1[math]\fbox{-/} [.3]0/.1/1/./0=0
1..
The general form a [math]\fbox{-/}[q] b=c , a [math]\fbox{-/} [.q] b=c .
The general form of the opposite numbers.
2..

extension
1..

2..

--------------
k11-gap opposite subtraction - 0 exists in a and b does not exist in the current mathematics
2/.4/2 [math]\fbox{-/ }[1]3/.3/2=0/.2/0

PDF - Mathematics - a new base
https://skydrive.live.com/?cid=48f411219265cf17#cid=48F411219265CF17&id=48F411219265CF17%21105