pfrankinstein wrote:

JayWilson wrote:

Excellent. So, now what? Where do we go from here?

A thought for you Jay..."Moments of conception".

Cheifly how many different kinds of phenominon be catergorised as Moments of conception?

The big bang. [Inorganic.]

The orgasm. [organic]

The eureka moment. [mind]

Paul.

Depends on how you define "moments of conception", I guess.

But since you explicitly mentioned the "moment" of conception, it sounds like "fertilization" to me. So none of the above, except maybe the last one, if you wanna indulge in metaphors and imagery...

TBH, it's really not easy to understand what you're getting at, Paul.

pfrankinstein wrote:

JayWilson wrote:

Excellent. So, now what? Where do we go from here?

A thought for you Jay..."Moments of conception".

Cheifly how many different kinds of phenominon be catergorised as Moments of conception?

The big bang. [Inorganic.]

The orgasm. [organic]

The eureka moment. [mind]

Paul.

The moment of ignition of a new star or sun. [Hot]
The pouring of that boiling water over those aromatic coffee beans as the sun streams through the window. [Steaming]
The speciation event in genus Equus africanus. [Donkey]
The splitting of two sets of genetic code into one. [Bollocks]

Paul.

hackenslash wrote:
I don't think it's going to get moved unless and until you present something coherent and... errr... scientific. I wouldn't even call this pseudoscience, to be honest, because it's little more than gibberish.

Might I suggest that you re-read the thread and attempt to [if you are capable of doing so] absorb the "One bang One process" concept.

No specific question hackenslash , why am i not surprised, truth is you just want a food fight don't cha?

Paul.

The moment of ignition of a new star or sun. [Hot]
The pouring of that boiling water over those aromatic coffee beans as the sun streams through the window. [Steaming]
The speciation event in genus Equus africanus. [Donkey]
The splitting of two sets of genetic code into one. [Bollocks]

Paul.

Donkey, bollocks, what would Fraud make of your move away from the 'hot to steaming train of thinking'?

Subconscious mind 'Virility' perhaps? Fertile donkey, testicles.

Your attempt to belittle my observation by offering up a poor ill-conceived rendition of your own falls flat.

.............................

edited. Scrub that 'Hot Steaming Donkey Bollocks'. Kinda funny as i think about it.

In metaphor, in the past i expressed that 'Science' can be seen as a fertile donkey carrying mankind into the future.

So. Hot steaming donkey bollocks tickles my funny bone.

Question is how fertile are scientists minds here in this forum.

Paul.



Paul.

pfrankinstein wrote:

hackenslash wrote:
I don't think it's going to get moved unless and until you present something coherent and... errr... scientific. I wouldn't even call this pseudoscience, to be honest, because it's little more than gibberish.

Might I suggest that you re-read the thread and attempt to [if you are capable of doing so] absorb the "One bang One process" concept.

No specific question hackenslash , why am i not surprised, truth is you just want a food fight don't cha?

Paul.

Dude, did you make the classic mistake of thinking that I hadn't read the thread?

Let me give you a clue. When I comment on a thread without reading the whole thread, I preface my comments with 'I haven't read the whoel thread but...'

That's how you can tell if I haven't read the thread.

Seriously, Paul, don't you remember me?

As for absorbing the concept, I absorbed that which was not couched in gibberish, even the extremely poorly articulated bits. There is no science in there, dude. If there were, I'd have spotted it.

pfrankinstein wrote:Donkey, bollocks, what would Fraud make of your move away from the 'hot to steaming train of thinking'?

Subconscious mind 'Virility' perhaps? Fertile donkey, testicles.

Your attempt to belittle my observation by offering up a poor ill-conceived rendition of your own falls flat.

Subconscious? Good sir, it evolved from my subconscious to my conscious long ago. Virility just pours from my pores, with no pause for applause. Verily virility lustily cascades merrily when I write (I mean it, sincerely).

What would Freud say about hot and steaming things? "Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar".

Paul.

PS: Any of my four examples that you don't think qualify as conception?

hackenslash wrote:Dude, did you make the classic mistake of thinking that I hadn't read the thread?

Dude; look mush if you had read the thread and applied some 'critical thinking' then you would accept the validity of my concept, since you do not i must assume that 1, you have not read the thread or 2 incapable of critical thinking.
So i compliment you by assuming that you have not read the thread.

Seriously, Paul, don't you remember me?

Why, should i, are you some kind of big hitter?

Paul.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_RjMSWhGWak[/youtube]

Paul.

Macroinvertebrate. Brilliant, grining from ear to ear. Cheers.

Paul.

Can somebody pass the Lithium Carbonate, please.

pfrankinstein wrote:Dude; look mush if you had read the thread and applied some 'critical thinking' then you would accept the validity of my concept, since you do not i must assume that 1, you have not read the thread or 2 incapable of critical thinking.

Ah, the old 'I am right and if you do not agree then you either didn't read it or didn't understand' line of argument.

Well, 'mush', you might want to introduce yourself to the principles of evidence and, more importantly, being coherent, and I mean that in both the linguistic and the logical sense.

So i compliment you by assuming that you have not read the thread.

Well, if it requires agreeing with your nonsensical bollocks to draw a compliment, I'd rather you just insulted me and had done with it.

Why, should i, are you some kind of big hitter?

Those whose guff has been hit by me certainly think so. Haven't you come across my fan club? Mostly thick as pigshit, but they are devoted.

Macroinvertebrate wrote:Paul.

Are you called Paul too? This thread is really swimming in them at the moment.

Paul.

Thommo wrote:

Macroinvertebrate wrote:Paul.

Are you called Paul too? This thread is really swimming in them at the moment.

Paul.

Yep.

Paul.

pfrankinstein wrote:

JayWilson wrote:

Excellent. So, now what? Where do we go from here?

A thought for you Jay..."Moments of conception".

Cheifly how many different kinds of phenominon be catergorised as Moments of conception?

The big bang. [Inorganic.]

The orgasm. [organic]

The eureka moment. [mind]

Paul.

Shouldn't the second one be orgasmic? By conception, do you mean the fusion of two gametes (genetic recombination)? Not all orgasms result in fertilisation. Nevertheless, I see your point, sort of. So, now that we have thought about these things, what do we do now? What's the next step?

JayWilson wrote:Shouldn't the second one be orgasmic? By conception, do you mean the fusion of two gametes (genetic recombination)? Not all orgasms result in fertilisation. Nevertheless, I see your point, sort of. So, now that we have thought about these things, what do we do now? What's the next step?

Hi Jay,

I don't suppose you're secretly called Paul in your spare time are you?

Paul.

Thommo wrote:

JayWilson wrote:Shouldn't the second one be orgasmic? By conception, do you mean the fusion of two gametes (genetic recombination)? Not all orgasms result in fertilisation. Nevertheless, I see your point, sort of. So, now that we have thought about these things, what do we do now? What's the next step?

Hi Jay,

I don't suppose you're secretly called Paul in your spare time are you?

Paul.

Hi Paul,

Not at aul.

Though, it's starting to grow on me.

Paul.

JayWilson wrote:

pfrankinstein wrote:

JayWilson wrote:

Excellent. So, now what? Where do we go from here?

A thought for you Jay..."Moments of conception".

Chiefly how many different kinds of phenomenon be categorized as Moments of conception?

The big bang. [Inorganic.]

The orgasm. [organic]

The eureka moment. [mind]

Paul.

Shouldn't the second one be orgasmic?

No, as stated. Examples of 'Moments of conception' are represented in three different forms. Inorganic,physical body and mind.

By conception, do you mean the fusion of two gametes (genetic recombination)?

No, you have lost the train completely.

Not all orgasms result in fertilisation.

Correct, there is often a gap, a pause moment between 'explosive conception' and fertilization.

Perhaps the penny will never drop.

Nevertheless, I see your point, sort of. So, now that we have thought about these things, what do we do now? What's the next step?

You do not see my point, seems to me that you attempt to piss down my back whilst telling me that it is raining. Your questions give you away.

Where do we go from here, the answer is nowhere, my time and effort would be wasted.

The moderators clearly show a vote of no confidence by ignoring my request for the thread to be moved.

I'm not planning to stick around in the forum for long you understand.

Paul.

Shame that, this being a 'lifeboat for the rational mind'. Smile.

pfrankinstein wrote:

JayWilson wrote:

pfrankinstein wrote:

A thought for you Jay..."Moments of conception".

Chiefly how many different kinds of phenomenon be categorized as Moments of conception?

The big bang. [Inorganic.]

The orgasm. [organic]

The eureka moment. [mind]

Paul.

Shouldn't the second one be orgasmic?

No, as stated. Examples of 'Moments of conception' are represented in three different forms. Inorganic,physical body and mind.

By conception, do you mean the fusion of two gametes (genetic recombination)?

No, you have lost the train completely.

Not all orgasms result in fertilisation.

Correct, there is often a gap, a pause moment between 'explosive conception' and fertilization.

Perhaps the penny will never drop.

Nevertheless, I see your point, sort of. So, now that we have thought about these things, what do we do now? What's the next step?

You do not see my point, seems to me that you attempt to piss down my back whilst telling me that it is raining. Your questions give you away.

Where do we go from here, the answer is nowhere, my time and effort would be wasted.

The moderators clearly show a vote of no confidence by ignoring my request for the thread to be moved.

I'm not planning to stick around in the forum for long you understand.

Paul

Paul, we don't fucking understand you. You're speaking in tongues. You're being unclear and you need to make a better case for whatever you're trying to prove. Would you PLEASE try making some sense, in a serious way. If we read all your posts together, then perhaps we know a smidgen of what you mean. That's not enough for anyone to take you seriously!

Furthermore, you just attacked probably the only post that was sympathetic to you here.

pfrankinstein wrote:No, as stated. Examples of 'Moments of conception' are represented in three different forms. Inorganic,physical body and mind.

Any chance of there being a fourth? That is, beyond the mind?

JayWilson wrote:

pfrankinstein wrote:No, as stated. Examples of 'Moments of conception' are represented in three different forms. Inorganic,physical body and mind.

Any chance of there being a fourth? That is, beyond the mind?

Good question Jay, honest answer, i don't know possibly. A new thought.

If i read you wrong my apologies, cranky mood tonight you understand.

Paul.