Work of Harley Borgais

free energy quantum energy

Discussions on astrology, homeopathy and superstition etc.

Moderators: Calilasseia, DarthHelmet86, Ironclad, Onyx8

Re: Work of Harley Borgais

#1261  Postby lucek » Sep 26, 2011 4:22 am

harleyborgais wrote:Apparently I have given the impression that Tsunamis caused by the Chicxulub impact went into orbit, but that is obviously silly.

The portion of water and minerals (sediment) that formed the tsunami is clearly a different portion from the ejecta that attained orbit, and any material that may have actually achieved escape velocity.

Water would have reformed once the material started cooling down (especially above 28 miles high, and more so above 53 miles, then into low orbit of 100 miles high, which most of the ejecta could have reached -references posted above-today).

The time it takes those hydrogen and oxygen atoms (or frozen snow-like molecules) to come down is a long time (see noctilucent clouds).

Plants dont really need or even use the higher UV light which is what the water block out. Those energies cause free radicals (ions-breaking molecules) which decrease life spans (learn about telemerase enzymes for more).

So what challenges have I still not met on this theory?

Thermal decomposition, also called thermolysis, is defined as a chemical reaction whereby a chemical substance breaks up into at least two chemical substances when heated. At elevated temperatures water molecules split into their atomic components hydrogen and oxygen. For example at 2200 °C about three percent of all H2O molecules are dissociated into various combinations of hydrogen and oxygen atoms, mostly H, H2, O, O2, and OH. Other reaction products like H2O2 or HO2 remain minor. At the very high temperature of 3000 °C more than half of the water molecules are decomposed, but at ambient temperatures only one molecule in 100 trillion dissociates by the effect of heat. However, catalysts can accelerate the dissociation of the water molecules at lower temperatures.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_splitting
This solar radiation flux FS is intercepted by the Earth over a disk of cross-sectional area pRE2 representing the shadow area of the Earth ( Figure 7-9 ). A fraction A of the intercepted radiation is reflected back to space by clouds, snow, ice...; A is called the planetary albedo. Satellite observations indicate A = 0.28 for the Earth. Thus the solar radiation absorbed by the Earth per unit time is given by FSpRE2(1-A). The mean solar radiation flux absorbed per unit area of the Earth's surface is FSpRE2(1-A)/4pRE2 = FS(1-A)/4.

http://acmg.seas.harvard.edu/people/faculty/djj/book/bookchap7.html

The energy that hits the upper atmosphere at the equator is just about the amount of energy the ground receives at the equator. The temperature record for earth is 136° F/57.8°C. If we ignore this is far hotter then the black body of the earth would suggest due to the greenhouse effect, we calculate a maximum temperature of 176.8° F/75.14°C.

So no the sun wouldn't heat water in orbit to temperatures were a significant minority decompose, and even then not all will decompose into atomic hydrogen and oxygen.
Next time a creationist says, "Were you there to watch the big bang", say "Yes we are".
While talking about green energy and china a friend of mine told me, "I don't believe in that, all that global warming and green gas."
User avatar
lucek
THREAD STARTER
 
Posts: 3051

United States (us)
Print view this post

Ads by Google


Re: Work of Harley Borgais

#1262  Postby hackenslash » Sep 26, 2011 5:15 am

harleyborgais wrote:Plasma is when the outer electrons extend well outside of the atoms, far beyond their normal outer shells radius.
The mass of a plasma is generally neutral, making it different than an ionized mass.


Arse-ways up as usual. Plasma is an ionised (or partially ionised) state.

For fuck's sake. How do you expect to generate the ultimate theory of everything if you can't even get the basics right?
Dogma is the death of the intellect
There is no more thunderous prescient of doom than the flutter of tiny wings...
User avatar
hackenslash
 
Name: The Other Sweary One
Posts: 18066
Age: 45
Male

Country: Republic of Mancunia
Print view this post

Re: Work of Harley Borgais

#1263  Postby harleyborgais » Sep 26, 2011 8:00 am

Oh, atoms are spherical, here is how I know....

Science and Mechanics from January 1964: "First photos of the Atom!"..pg-69:
(scanned copy of atom images are on my website: [url:test-text]http://www.freeornottobe.org/freeornottobe/images/Nemescope-%201st%20Photo%20of%20Atoms.jpg[/url])

Also there are the subatomic orbitals...
Image
Image

Then look at the end of this collage of images...
Image

The flower of life pattern with two harmonic circles (2x and 1/2x each others sizes)...
that is the form of solid atoms, where the outer shell links to other atoms by passing through the nucleus of those other atoms.

That is what the flower of life pattern is supposed to represent...interlinking energy fields.


The forces of nature are extensions of the physical forms that make particles.
Since those structures spin around three dimensions they form spheres.

Since those structures interlink (centers to circumferences), they form the flower of life pattern.

This applies to all the electrons in the atoms, the shells of the atoms (formed by the protons and neutrons in the nuclei), to molecules, cells, organisms, planets, starts, galaxies, and probably to the universe, and beyond...

This form of the flower of life and all of the forms that come from it through infolding (forms dividing inside themselves and getting ever more complicated, like how life has evolved, or how stars became solar systems which became galaxies, which started life...)

That most basic form is a curvature which spins. These are positive or negative (protons or electrons respectively).
Put one of each together into a unique, tight-binary-orbit and get a Neutron.
Interlink several neutrons together in a chain-mail fashion to get dark matter (which is what black holes are made of...they are the nuclei which form galaxies around them just like heavy atoms form as electrons collect around heavy nuclei during supernovas).
harleyborgais
 
Name: Harley Borgais
Posts: 637

Country: USA
United States (us)
Print view this post

Re: Work of Harley Borgais

#1264  Postby harleyborgais » Sep 26, 2011 8:01 am

Here:
Image
harleyborgais
 
Name: Harley Borgais
Posts: 637

Country: USA
United States (us)
Print view this post

Re: Work of Harley Borgais

#1265  Postby harleyborgais » Sep 26, 2011 8:04 am

If you cannot see how these atoms match the flower of life pattern at the bottom left of the symbols image...
then try making the flower of life pattern, and the 5 platonic solids from it...
as well as looking up the tree of life and flaming sword symbols which fit it...
and metatrons cube (used for the platonic solids).

After that practice you should see how that sacred geometry really represents the most basic template of our physical existence.


That most basic building block is the dipole, the north and south magnetic field, which is generated by the spin of a negative or positive charge like the electrons and protons (all particles have dipoles, neutrons included...photons are not real particles because they are not spherical, they travel straight at light speed, they are EM waves).
harleyborgais
 
Name: Harley Borgais
Posts: 637

Country: USA
United States (us)
Print view this post

Re: Work of Harley Borgais

#1266  Postby theropod » Sep 26, 2011 11:45 am

harleyborgais wrote:Theropod:
Tulane University WEB SITE says:
... An impact like the one that struck the Yucatan Peninsula, in Mexico about 65 million years ago, thought responsible for the extinction of the dinosaurs and numerous other species, created the Chicxulub Crater, 180 km in diameter and released energy equivalent to about 100 million megatons of TNT.

There is the energy of the impact...
now we can use the size (about 6.4-9.3 miles diameter) and try to figure out how much material it launched up.


harleyborgais,

I am fully aware of how much energy was released during the Chicxulub bolide event. It really doesn't matter how much material was ejected. This does not support your assertions in any way. This has been explained to you so many times it's absolutely silly to cover the same ground again and again.

You have no evidence of any water canopy forming as the result of this, or any other, impact throwing enough water into space to create such a barrier. None. All you have is an assertion and a bad one at that.

I really don't care any more. It doesn't matter how wrong your assertions are, or what empirical evidence is supplied you in rebuttal, because you cannot accept the fact that there was no global flood ever. EVER.

RS
14 years off-grid and counting.

Sleeping in the hen house doesn't make you a chicken.
User avatar
theropod
RS Donator
 
Name: Roger
Posts: 6501
Age: 60
Male

Country: USA
United States (us)
Print view this post

Re: Work of Harley Borgais

#1267  Postby lucek » Sep 26, 2011 1:08 pm

Not to pick nits but the Nemescope was never released to the scientific community, it's abilities are claimed off only one groups opinions, and (heres the big one) claims to take pictures of objects smaller then the wavelengths of light it is using to see them. Even today optical microscopy only produces images of objects in the 15-250 micromiter range.
Next time a creationist says, "Were you there to watch the big bang", say "Yes we are".
While talking about green energy and china a friend of mine told me, "I don't believe in that, all that global warming and green gas."
User avatar
lucek
THREAD STARTER
 
Posts: 3051

United States (us)
Print view this post

Ads by Google


Re: Work of Harley Borgais

#1268  Postby Paul » Sep 26, 2011 3:13 pm

harleyborgais wrote:I have clearly said that liquid or vaporized h20 molecules can not exist above 28.3 miles elevation...
but that Hydrogen and Oxygen gas do when light is hitting them...
and when there is no light to heat them, they solidify directly into snow-like ice and form such bodies as Noctilucent clouds.


Are you saying that sunlight heats gases in the upper atmosphere as it passes through them?
User avatar
Paul
 
Posts: 4046
Age: 56
Male

United Kingdom (uk)
Print view this post

Re: Work of Harley Borgais

#1269  Postby Weaver » Sep 26, 2011 4:24 pm


!
GENERAL MODNOTE
Folks, some of the posts here have been veering off-topic - please try to stay within the scope of the thread in the future, OK?

Thanks,
Weaver
Image
Retired AiF

Cogito, Ergo Armatus Sum.
User avatar
Weaver
RS Donator
 
Posts: 16567
Age: 46
Male

Country: USA
United States (us)
Print view this post

Re: Work of Harley Borgais

#1270  Postby hackenslash » Sep 26, 2011 5:16 pm

There's a topic? :what:



:hide:
Dogma is the death of the intellect
There is no more thunderous prescient of doom than the flutter of tiny wings...
User avatar
hackenslash
 
Name: The Other Sweary One
Posts: 18066
Age: 45
Male

Country: Republic of Mancunia
Print view this post

Re: Work of Harley Borgais

#1271  Postby Dov Henis » Oct 29, 2011 3:53 pm

An Embarrassingly Obvious Theory Of Everything

EOTOE, Some Implications (I)

A.
EOTOE is an Embarrassingly Obvious Theory Of Everything.

In essence it states that all things in the universe, nouns and verbs objects and processes, originate and derive from the energy-mass dualism.

Origin and essence of this derivation are expressed mathematically by

E=Total[m(1+ D)] (D = distance travelled by mass since singularity)

Which suggests that the universe cycles between two poles: singularity/all-mass , and maximum-expanded/nearly-all-energy.
The “nearly” all-energy leaves behind some mass formats that begin consolidating by gravity, when it eventually overcomes expansion as the mass fueling the expansion is nearly depleted, becoming very small m multiplied by very large D = E .

B.
Thus the essence/definition of gravitation is:
“Gravitation Is the propensity of energy reconversion to mass”.

Gravitation is the “monotheism” and the “ genesis” of the universe. Singularity, at D = 0, is the very brief all-mass pole of the universe. The Big-Bang-inflation did not produce matter or anti-matter. It was the beginning of mass reconversion into energy, of increasing D fueled by decreasing m.

The conjectured gravitons, smallest basic particles, most probably do exist, but must be with mass, and gravitons microclusters must “big-bang” during the on-going expansion at a resolution of their energy-mass superposition.

This is rationally commonsensical, therefore it is scientifically probable.
Inflation started with the whole universe m shattering into fragments that evolved into, became, the galaxy clusters. The clusters expansion is fed at a constant rate by m-fuel. Since expansion accelerates, since the clusters depart from each other at an ever increasing velocity, we learn that the rate of m-to-E reconversion in the universe is constant. The accelerated expansion derives from the ever decreasing m of each cluster.

C.
Thus the essence/definition of evolution, natural selection is:
Mass formats attaining temporary augmented energy constraint in their successive generations, with energy drained from other mass formats, to temporarily postpone, survive, the reversion of their own constitutional mass to the pool of cosmic energy fueling the galactic clusters expansion.

This explains why black holes and humans, in fact all mass formats, must feed themselves in order to survive.
This explains that the essence of quantum mechanics of all processes is the detailed procession steps, the evolution details, between physical states ordained for natural selection.

D.
Thus comes to light the universe inspected progressively in greater detail.
Science reveals the universe’s nature-scope and directing drive, followed by technology studying its evolution details-aspects, followed by engineering exploitation of the attained information. This suggests the specific weight, importance, of science, technology and engineering in considering of research or enterprise plans and implementation.

Dov Henis (comments from 22nd century)
http://universe-life.com/

PS1:
Definitely: Dark energy and dark matter YOK! Universe's m reconverts to E at a constant rate…
Universe accelerated expansion is per Newton's motion laws, obviously…
Also, universe physics constants should vary, probably slightly, between galaxies clusters due to different clusters sizes...
Also, the clusters formed by dispersion at inflation…

PS2:
The singularity constituents must have been the smallest elementary particles. They may be designated gravitons, but they MUST HAVE MASS. They were born at the energy-mass superposition resolution, together with the fragments that became galaxies clusters.
At expansion D increases, therefore m decreases, which per Newton mandates mass and matter acceleration. This goes on, most probably, at a constant rate of mass-to-energy reconversion, at an energy-mass resolution, mandated by the equality of both sides of the top equation.. And this resolution is, for each graviton, most probably in a format of a minuscule big-bang.

This is a lesser fantasy than the dark matter and energy fantasy. Such mass-energy gravitons may be omnipresent within each galaxies cluster, maintaining each cluster as a primordial Newtonian body and being the fuel-driver of expansion.

DH

==============================

EOTOE, Some Implications (II)

This equation describes the presently expanding universe:

E=Total[m(1 + D)] D = distance travelled by mass since singularity

This equation describes the future contracting universe:

E=Total[m(1 - D)] D = distance travelled by mass since end expansion

Implications:

The base units of mass - may be designated gravitons but MUST have mass - are not temporal, they never disappear.

In the present expanding universe they are in motion as mD away from the singularity point.
Those of them that hit a whatever mass format and move it become inert. This will go on until all or nearly all of them cease moving forward, i.e. until D ceases growing.

When D ceases growing gravitation will overcome the inertial motion away from the singularity point and will start pulling them back towards it. It is then that -D will replace +D, to maintain the equation’s equality…

And MORE, MUCH MORE:

The rational commonsensical, and therefore scientifically probable, implication is that Space is imbued with these massed gravitons that are continuously left behind during Expansion… also as micro clusters sized between gravitons and neutrinos…

DH
=========================

EOTOE, Some Implications (III)

Classically:

Energy = dynamic quality, the capacity of acting or being active, a fundamental entity of nature that is transferred between componentsts of a system in the production of physical change within the system and usually regarded as the capacity for doing work.

Mass = Mass is the quantity of inertia possessed by an object or the proportion between force and acceleration referred to in Newton’s Second Law of Motion.

Per EOTOE :

E=Total[m(1 + D)] D = distance travelled by mass since singularity

Energy is mass in motion.

The mass of the universe is either in motion or in the form of inert massed gravitons, with which the universe is imbued.

m of the EOTOE equation is only the energetic m, the m which is in motion.

The inert gravitons do not play a role in the E,m,D relationship. At the (present) universe expansion phase mass reconverts to energy at a constant rate, leaving behind inert gravitons. Inert gravitons become energetically active when they are reset in motion, i.e. when acted upon by energy, such as by gravity during the universe re-contraction phase.

Dov Henis (comments from the 22nd century)
http://universe-life.com
User avatar
Dov Henis
Banned Spammer
 
Name: Dov Henis
Posts: 16

Country: Israel
Israel (il)
Print view this post

Re: Work of Harley Borgais

#1272  Postby Brain man » Oct 29, 2011 5:05 pm

hi DOV... yes i remember this on the cover of new scientist about 10 years ago. I think they called it the cyclic universe concept. I need to dig it out.

However we are in a new age now where scientists as a group are in a last gasp desperate struggle to try and make old models fit, basically because that represents their life, consciousness, career meaning etc all tied up into one, and are desperate to make it consistent with a pile of old stuff that makes many go bleary and teary eyed with nostalgia. e.g.

Image

In psychology the period before a depression and open mindedness to new ideas is preceded by an intense and cognitively violent struggle where nothing new is listened to. Anybody who has suffered rage before a depression will understand that process. This is what is happening in astrophysics and some other sciences right now, although not in bio, nanotech and computational sciences.

For now dont expect an easy ride against a mass consciousness that is in the middle of this struggle (especially here). They want it complicated and messed up, as this provides a smokescreen to get a buy some extra time amongst other things. It also creates lots of jobs :) People ask for evidence, and complete models which is not reasonable because evidence and very good models today requires accesses to massive resources (teams and equipment) which are being hogged by the people trying to make the old ideas work.

Best thing is just keep refining the work to the best degree possible and try to have it journal encoded if territorial claim is important. Find colleagues with strengths where you have weaknesses and write papers together, badger for grants. Eventually whatever is right will be taken in.
Inherently Dishonest Clueless Researcher
User avatar
Brain man
Banned Troll
 
Name: Aznali Exidore
Posts: 1351
Age: 46
Male

Country: UK
United Kingdom (uk)
Print view this post

Re: Work of Harley Borgais

#1273  Postby Jumbo » Oct 31, 2011 4:36 pm

Dov Henis wrote:An Embarrassingly Obvious Theory Of Everything

EOTOE, Some Implications (I)

A.
EOTOE is an Embarrassingly Obvious Theory Of Everything.

In essence it states that all things in the universe, nouns and verbs objects and processes, originate and derive from the energy-mass dualism.

Origin and essence of this derivation are expressed mathematically by

E=Total[m(1+ D)] (D = distance travelled by mass since singularity)

Which suggests that the universe cycles between two poles: singularity/all-mass , and maximum-expanded/nearly-all-energy.
The “nearly” all-energy leaves behind some mass formats that begin consolidating by gravity, when it eventually overcomes expansion as the mass fueling the expansion is nearly depleted, becoming very small m multiplied by very large D = E .


This formula cannot be right as its dimensionally incorrect.

Energy has dimensions M L^2 /T and the right hand side does not have the same. This kills off any chance of it being the right relation between the properties.

more to follow if i get a moment
The Feynman Problem-Solving Algorithm

1. Write down the problem.
2. Think very hard.
3. Write down the answer.
User avatar
Jumbo
 
Posts: 3599
Age: 35
Male

United Kingdom (uk)
Print view this post

Re: Work of Harley Borgais

#1274  Postby Jumbo » Nov 01, 2011 1:36 am

B.
Thus the essence/definition of gravitation is:
“Gravitation Is the propensity of energy reconversion to mass”.

Gravitation is the “monotheism” and the “ genesis” of the universe. Singularity, at D = 0, is the very brief all-mass pole of the universe. The Big-Bang-inflation did not produce matter or anti-matter. It was the beginning of mass reconversion into energy, of increasing D fueled by decreasing m.

The conjectured gravitons, smallest basic particles, most probably do exist, but must be with mass, and gravitons microclusters must “big-bang” during the on-going expansion at a resolution of their energy-mass superposition.

This is rationally commonsensical, therefore it is scientifically probable.
Inflation started with the whole universe m shattering into fragments that evolved into, became, the galaxy clusters. The clusters expansion is fed at a constant rate by m-fuel. Since expansion accelerates, since the clusters depart from each other at an ever increasing velocity, we learn that the rate of m-to-E reconversion in the universe is constant. The accelerated expansion derives from the ever decreasing m of each cluster.

Gravity in the Newtonian limit is simply the tendency of one mass to attract another. Relativistically its the set of effects caused by the curvature of space time.

Where is there any example of energy being changed to mass in gravitation? If this were so surely gravitating bodies would constantly gain mass. Something thats not observed.

Any mass to a graviton is liable to be tiny and apparently would require serious adaptions to physics to work:
http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:djnVIYPz0M4J:https://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~giulini/papers/MassiveGravity.pdf+graviton+mass&hl=en&gl=uk&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESjbxwnTP_vYQiG-ZaXNn1WHdMFCs9sfBYVhq0A6Xy_hVWGWZNGcKluvPO-qQISx9j4VxxPGwgM352f2bUWfI6kZ-leWnUViXMPCaeI4VMWSftpWaWlsj0wARAd89rWTV5qIS43N&sig=AHIEtbSQVEyOhm349zpNAbSNLFIj4ASGpQ

Definitely: Dark energy and dark matter YOK! Universe's m reconverts to E at a constant rate…
Universe accelerated expansion is per Newton's motion laws, obviously…
Also, universe physics constants should vary, probably slightly, between galaxies clusters due to different clusters sizes...
Also, the clusters formed by dispersion at inflation…

If the expansion was accelerated per Newtons motion laws are you claiming that special relativity is simply wrong? If you are ten how do you account for all of the SR effects that have been observed by experiment? If you are not then how can you possibly account for the super luminal velocity of the more distant galaxies?
The Feynman Problem-Solving Algorithm

1. Write down the problem.
2. Think very hard.
3. Write down the answer.
User avatar
Jumbo
 
Posts: 3599
Age: 35
Male

United Kingdom (uk)
Print view this post

Re: Work of Harley Borgais

#1275  Postby Spearthrower » Nov 06, 2011 10:07 am

Harley - one thing I have noticed about you is that you are very willing to go and look at new evidence, but only from the context that it MUST support your previously held beliefs, and you contort yourself into the most absurd positions to try to maintain the veneer that these things don't outright contradict your cherished notions.

The Great Flood is a myth. End of story. If you want to believe it, just believe it - no point in trying to shore up scraps of evidence that don't contradict the claim when you have to ignore mountains of evidence that quite clearly stipulates - no - global - flood.
I'm not an atheist; I just don't believe in gods.
Religion: Mass Stockholm Syndrome

Learn Stuff. Stuff good. https://www.coursera.org/
User avatar
Spearthrower
 
Posts: 18239
Age: 38
Male

Country: Thailand
Print view this post

Ads by Google


Re: Work of Harley Borgais

#1276  Postby Spearthrower » Nov 06, 2011 10:08 am

Brain man wrote:
However we are in a new age now where scientists as a group are in a last gasp desperate struggle to try and make old models fit, basically because that represents their life, consciousness, career meaning etc all tied up into one, and are desperate to make it consistent with a pile of old stuff that makes many go bleary and teary eyed with nostalgia. e.g.



:crazy:
I'm not an atheist; I just don't believe in gods.
Religion: Mass Stockholm Syndrome

Learn Stuff. Stuff good. https://www.coursera.org/
User avatar
Spearthrower
 
Posts: 18239
Age: 38
Male

Country: Thailand
Print view this post

Re: Work of Harley Borgais

#1277  Postby The_Metatron » Nov 06, 2011 3:49 pm

Spearthrower wrote:
Brain man wrote:
However we are in a new age now where scientists as a group are in a last gasp desperate struggle to try and make old models fit, basically because that represents their life, consciousness, career meaning etc all tied up into one, and are desperate to make it consistent with a pile of old stuff that makes many go bleary and teary eyed with nostalgia. e.g.

:crazy:

Yeah, all the scienticians aren't nouveaux smart like Brain Man and Harley. They're the establishmentTM, otherwise known as the manTM, or perhaps academiaTM.

The better to see your conspiracy theories with...
My blog, Skepdick.eu

"If a human disagrees with you, let him live. In a hundred billion galaxies, you will not find another." - Carl Sagan
User avatar
The_Metatron
Moderator
 
Name: Jesse
Posts: 14710
Age: 51
Male

Country: United States
United States (us)
Print view this post

Re: Work of Harley Borgais

#1278  Postby Brain man » Nov 06, 2011 4:54 pm

The_Metatron wrote:
Spearthrower wrote:
Brain man wrote:
However we are in a new age now where scientists as a group are in a last gasp desperate struggle to try and make old models fit, basically because that represents their life, consciousness, career meaning etc all tied up into one, and are desperate to make it consistent with a pile of old stuff that makes many go bleary and teary eyed with nostalgia. e.g.

:crazy:

Yeah, all the scienticians aren't nouveaux smart like Brain Man and Harley. They're the establishmentTM, otherwise known as the manTM, or perhaps academiaTM.

The better to see your conspiracy theories with...


In case you havent been keeping up to date with the news, academia is collapsing under its own weight, and theres not many of the current generation willing to prop it up anymore. So whats going to happen ? Well obviously great slices of it are going to fall apart. If anything spearthrowers comments about harleys process are what is happening in academia. Increasing amounts of resources going into sticking plasters for theories with major problems. Physics and evolution mostly. Amazingly there are plenty of solutions, but it seems nobody in the US system dare question that the fix might involve a rethink of some fundamentals.

creationism has something to do with it. Its created a climate where some of the scientific points the creationists have made are actually very valid.

http://www.uncommondescent.com/intellig ... sor-myers/
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/155643 ... =apture-20
http://post-darwinist.blogspot.com/2008 ... he-is.html

Whats going on is that creationists have resources to buy some actually pretty competent scientists and create very comprehensive lists of holes in evolution. Purely strategic for their own purposes of course. i.e. to prop up their own taxpayers for want of a better word. The strange result is these people they employ are now producing the better science from what i can make out. Myers and dawkins even had to rewind their view on structuralism recently. 2 years ago myers was calling that crackpot science.

See its not simple. You cant just pick a side and expect thats it. stick to what academics release and all will be OK. life is never that easy.
Inherently Dishonest Clueless Researcher
User avatar
Brain man
Banned Troll
 
Name: Aznali Exidore
Posts: 1351
Age: 46
Male

Country: UK
United Kingdom (uk)
Print view this post

Re: Work of Harley Borgais

#1279  Postby hackenslash » Nov 06, 2011 7:01 pm

Hahahahahahahahaha! Now I've seen it all, and the science-denial picture is complete.

Yet another fucking cretinist in a stolen lab coat. Case dismissed.
Dogma is the death of the intellect
There is no more thunderous prescient of doom than the flutter of tiny wings...
User avatar
hackenslash
 
Name: The Other Sweary One
Posts: 18066
Age: 45
Male

Country: Republic of Mancunia
Print view this post

Re: Work of Harley Borgais

#1280  Postby Sovereign » Nov 06, 2011 8:32 pm

Brain Man, why haven't the alt science people ever produced testable theories? Give me one that is supported by observed and/or experimental data.
Sovereign
 
Posts: 2940
Male

United States (us)
Print view this post

PreviousNext

Return to Pseudoscience

Who is online

Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 12 guests