#22 by newolder » May 24, 2019 4:52 pm
The third study at the first link has a treated sample cohort of 15, the quoted measure of 'pain' is subjective and the observed angles (given to 1/10th degree measurement accuracy) have a statistical range of a few degrees on a claimed effect only slightly larger. Also, I remain unsure how the physiotherapist was also 'blinded' by the protocol - perhaps you could explain further (it could be that I didn't understand the quoted method correctly)?
Since you expect results from micro-physio, it would be prudent to observe kilo-, or better mega-, numbers of volunteers.
At this early stage, confidence in the reported conclusions remains low.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould