Keep It Real wrote:
Describes me pretty perfectly I reckon![]()
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/general-chat/the-best-50-quid-i-ve-ever-spent-t55058.html
There's literally nothing in the post you linked to which shows you to be such a one.
Moderators: kiore, Blip, The_Metatron
Keep It Real wrote:
Describes me pretty perfectly I reckon![]()
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/general-chat/the-best-50-quid-i-ve-ever-spent-t55058.html
Fallible wrote:
I can't agree with you there. 'Lady' is extremely annoying to some people, often because of this idea of a 'gentler' word. Why is that necessary? Do we need to be gentle to 'ladies'? There's only one circumstance I would use either 'lady' or 'gentleman', and it's if I'm referring to an unknown person either to a child, for example 'little Johnny, move over and let the gentleman pass', or to another adult, eg. 'this lady was in line before me', within earshot of the person themselves. Why use anything other than 'woman' if in the same circumstance you would use 'man'?
Keep It Real wrote:SafeAsMilk wrote:
Wait, so you don't want to offend people who don't like woman because it's got man in it, but you think those same people would be totally fine with "lady" or "bird"
Strawmantastic SAM. Strange - that's not like you at all
Fallible wrote:Keep It Real wrote:
Describes me pretty perfectly I reckon![]()
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/general-chat/the-best-50-quid-i-ve-ever-spent-t55058.html
There's literally nothing in the post you linked to which shows you to be such a one.
Keep It Real wrote:Fallible wrote:Keep It Real wrote:
Describes me pretty perfectly I reckon![]()
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/general-chat/the-best-50-quid-i-ve-ever-spent-t55058.html
There's literally nothing in the post you linked to which shows you to be such a one.
It publicises the kSafe which will hopefully rescue addicts.
The_Piper wrote:What is because what's a sign of weakness?
Return to Psychology & Neuroscience
Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest