Moderators: Spinozasgalt, reddix
Have you ever heard of a "tiebreaker"?... something which doesn't matter when comparing two things that are significantly different in other ways, but does matter when all else is equal?Panderos wrote:Therefore you favour only the best system, which means you agree with me that anachronisms doesn't come into it.

Delvo wrote:Have you ever heard of a "tiebreaker"?... something which doesn't matter when comparing two things that are significantly different in other ways, but does matter when all else is equal?Panderos wrote:Therefore you favour only the best system, which means you agree with me that anachronisms doesn't come into it.

Panderos wrote:Blip wrote:
I'm not sure how you arrived at the idea that I favour only the best system from my response that modernity is not the be-all-and-end-all, Panderos. My opposition to hereditary privilege derives from principle, not the fact that it is an anachronism. My reference to the 21st century was in the context of wider education, consensual rights and so on.
Ok, so would you prefer a worse system that is better in your opinion 'in principle'?
Evolving wrote:Blip, intrepid pilot of light aircraft and wrangler with alligators.


Return to Social Sciences & Humanities
Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest