Spinoff from the Eric Pepke thread - pedophiles

[Scot Dutchy]

A very interesting video about millennials:

[Thomas Eshuis]

A very interesting video about millennials:

I think you posted this in the wrong thread perhaps?
Anyway:

[Thomas Eshuis]

The amount of horseshit and misunderstanding of statistics in the video Scot posted is staggering btw.

[Scot Dutchy]

The amount of horseshit and misunderstanding of statistics in the video Scot posted is staggering btw.

In what way?

[Scot Dutchy]

Too close to home? I found it very accurate.

[Thomas Eshuis]

The amount of horseshit and misunderstanding of statistics in the video Scot posted is staggering btw.

In what way?

Correlation = causation fallacies, for example with regards to people who use FB more are more depressed.
Treating Millenials as one homogenous group, wich they are not.

[Scot Dutchy]

The amount of horseshit and misunderstanding of statistics in the video Scot posted is staggering btw.

In what way?

Correlation = causation fallacies, for example with regards to people who use FB more are more depressed.
Treating Millenials as one homogenous group, wich they are not.

Maybe being part of the group does make things hazy. It happens all the time with generations. I was the '60's generation. We are now into the Snowflake generation. Of course there are exceptions but the general trend is there.

[Thomas Eshuis]

The amount of horseshit and misunderstanding of statistics in the video Scot posted is staggering btw.

In what way?

Correlation = causation fallacies, for example with regards to people who use FB more are more depressed.
Treating Millenials as one homogenous group, wich they are not.

Maybe being part of the group does make things hazy.

Quite the opposite, it makes it easier to see the differences between yourself and your group of friends, in relation to other groups of peers.

It happens all the time with generations. I was the '60's generation. We are now into the Snowflake generation. Of course there are exceptions but the general trend is there.

No, there really isn't and if you watch the video I posted you''ll see that the same charges levelled at millenials and the youngest generation were also levelled at your generation and those of my parents and their/your parents.

[Scot Dutchy]

Dont see that. Every generation is different. Disagree with his arguments. Of course not 100% will be the same but in the passage of time every generation is affected differently and I think Simon Sinek is much closer.

I dont agree being part of the group makes it easier. Being outside looking in is a better position.

[Thomas Eshuis]

Dont see that.

With all due respect, your personal ignorance is irrelevant.

Every generation is different.

You need to present evidence that 'generations' exist as anything beyond artificial social constructs.

Disagree with his arguments.

They're not just arguments Scot, he presents evidence that your parents considered you generation the same entitled lazy no-goods. As did their parents etc.

Of course not 100% will be the same but in the passage of time every generation is affected differently and I think Simon Sinek is much closer.

I dont agree being part of the group makes it easier. Being outside looking in is a better position.

It's not. Being outside the group means you lack experience of being part of that group.
A problem that is made worse by people like Sinek making wild generalisations based on the very limited contact they've had with supposed 'millenials'.

[Scot Dutchy]

Sorry that is your opinion. I have seen more generations than you have and what I have seen with the millennials is not really enthralling and the snowflakes are no better. If you cant see generation differences when it is so obvious well what evidence would change anything.

[SpeedOfSound]

Dont see that.

With all due respect, your personal ignorance is irrelevant.

Every generation is different.

You need to present evidence that 'generations' exist as anything beyond artificial social constructs.

Disagree with his arguments.

They're not just arguments Scot, he presents evidence that your parents considered you generation the same entitled lazy no-goods. As did their parents etc.

Of course not 100% will be the same but in the passage of time every generation is affected differently and I think Simon Sinek is much closer.

I dont agree being part of the group makes it easier. Being outside looking in is a better position.

It's not. Being outside the group means you lack experience of being part of that group.
A problem that is made worse by people like Sinek making wild generalisations based on the very limited contact they've had with supposed 'millenials'.

I'm certain that everyone under thirty is an entitled lazy no-good. Also that they are blind to the fact.

[Scot Dutchy]

It's not. Being outside the group means you lack experience of being part of that group.
A problem that is made worse by people like Sinek making wild generalisations based on the very limited contact they've had with supposed 'millenials'.

You are acting just like a millennial. Just proves the point.

Of course you cant see it.

[Thomas Eshuis]

Dont see that.

With all due respect, your personal ignorance is irrelevant.

Every generation is different.

You need to present evidence that 'generations' exist as anything beyond artificial social constructs.

Disagree with his arguments.

They're not just arguments Scot, he presents evidence that your parents considered you generation the same entitled lazy no-goods. As did their parents etc.

Of course not 100% will be the same but in the passage of time every generation is affected differently and I think Simon Sinek is much closer.

I dont agree being part of the group makes it easier. Being outside looking in is a better position.

It's not. Being outside the group means you lack experience of being part of that group.
A problem that is made worse by people like Sinek making wild generalisations based on the very limited contact they've had with supposed 'millenials'.

I'm certain that everyone under thirty is an entitled lazy no-good. Also that they are blind to the fact.

Uh-hu, just like you parents generation was certain that you and your peers were entitled lazy no-goods and you are blind to the fact.

[Thomas Eshuis]

It's not. Being outside the group means you lack experience of being part of that group.
A problem that is made worse by people like Sinek making wild generalisations based on the very limited contact they've had with supposed 'millenials'.

You are acting just like a millennial. Just proves the point.

You know what they say about claims asserted without evidence ...

[Scot Dutchy]

It's not. Being outside the group means you lack experience of being part of that group.
A problem that is made worse by people like Sinek making wild generalisations based on the very limited contact they've had with supposed 'millenials'.

You are acting just like a millennial. Just proves the point.

You know what they say about claims asserted without evidence ...

There a plenty of observations about different generations. Is yours any different? No ofcourse not. As I said making these assertions is simply being your generation.

[Thomas Eshuis]

It's not. Being outside the group means you lack experience of being part of that group.
A problem that is made worse by people like Sinek making wild generalisations based on the very limited contact they've had with supposed 'millenials'.

You are acting just like a millennial. Just proves the point.

You know what they say about claims asserted without evidence ...

There a plenty of observations about different generations. Is yours any different? No ofcourse not. As I said making these assertions is simply being your generation.

Circular reasoning at it's finest. Not to mention the continued refusal to acknowledge the facts that contradict your position.

[SpeedOfSound]

Dont see that.

With all due respect, your personal ignorance is irrelevant.

Every generation is different.

You need to present evidence that 'generations' exist as anything beyond artificial social constructs.

Disagree with his arguments.

They're not just arguments Scot, he presents evidence that your parents considered you generation the same entitled lazy no-goods. As did their parents etc.

Of course not 100% will be the same but in the passage of time every generation is affected differently and I think Simon Sinek is much closer.

I dont agree being part of the group makes it easier. Being outside looking in is a better position.

It's not. Being outside the group means you lack experience of being part of that group.
A problem that is made worse by people like Sinek making wild generalisations based on the very limited contact they've had with supposed 'millenials'.

I'm certain that everyone under thirty is an entitled lazy no-good. Also that they are blind to the fact.

Uh-hu, just like you parents generation was certain that you and your peers were entitled lazy no-goods and you are blind to the fact.

Just the other day my mom said "Damn! I thought you were bad but these god damned millennials!"

[Scot Dutchy]

You are acting just like a millennial. Just proves the point.

You know what they say about claims asserted without evidence ...

There a plenty of observations about different generations. Is yours any different? No ofcourse not. As I said making these assertions is simply being your generation.

Circular reasoning at it's finest. Not to mention the continued refusal to acknowledge the facts that contradict your position.

What facts?

[laklak]

All generations prior to mine were old fuddy-duddies, all generations after are lazy moochers. It is known.