Spinoff from the Eric Pepke thread - pedophiles

Anthropology, Economics, History, Sociology etc.

Moderators: kiore, The_Metatron, Blip

Re: Spinoff from the Eric Pepke thread - pedophiles

#381  Postby Fallible » Jan 09, 2017 8:43 pm

I really am not about to get worked up over what I am in your opinion, having a fairly good insight into what your opinions look like.
She battled through in every kind of tribulation,
She revelled in adventure and imagination.
She never listened to no hater, liar,
Breaking boundaries and chasing fire.
Oh, my my! Oh my, she flies!
User avatar
Fallible
RS Donator
 
Name: Alice Pooper
Posts: 51607
Age: 49
Female

Country: Engerland na na
Canada (ca)
Print view this post

Re: Spinoff from the Eric Pepke thread - pedophiles

#382  Postby Thomas Eshuis » Jan 09, 2017 8:44 pm

Keep It Real wrote:imo Fallible and Thomas Eshuis, you're paedophilia enablers, both of you. You say they think paedophilia is deeply wrong, yet they do it anyway. They need be disabused of this notion. You should be sanctioned by the board admin.

I cannot be sanctioned for something I have not done KIR.
Why don't you drop the baseless personalised remarks and adress what we actually post.
"Respect for personal beliefs = "I am going to tell you all what I think of YOU, but don't dare retort and tell what you think of ME because...it's my personal belief". Hmm. A bully's charter and no mistake."
User avatar
Thomas Eshuis
 
Name: Thomas Eshuis
Posts: 31091
Age: 32
Male

Country: Netherlands
European Union (eur)
Print view this post

Re: Spinoff from the Eric Pepke thread - pedophiles

#383  Postby archibald » Jan 09, 2017 8:44 pm

I have read that some pedophiles report not understanding why society thinks what they do is wrong.

"Shocking as that may be to those who don’t share their sexual attraction to children, this is why one serial sex offender told me he offends. He understands that society deems what he did was wrong, but he can’t understand why this is the case."
http://theconversation.com/psychology-o ... dren-59991
Last edited by archibald on Jan 09, 2017 8:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"It seems rather obvious that plants have free will. Don't know why that would be controversial."
(John Platko)
archibald
 
Posts: 10298
Male

Country: Northern Ireland
Print view this post

Re: Spinoff from the Eric Pepke thread - pedophiles

#384  Postby Fallible » Jan 09, 2017 8:44 pm

Incidentally KIR, your comment doesn't make sense, surprise surprise. Why would they need to be disabused of the notion that paedophilia is deeply wrong?
She battled through in every kind of tribulation,
She revelled in adventure and imagination.
She never listened to no hater, liar,
Breaking boundaries and chasing fire.
Oh, my my! Oh my, she flies!
User avatar
Fallible
RS Donator
 
Name: Alice Pooper
Posts: 51607
Age: 49
Female

Country: Engerland na na
Canada (ca)
Print view this post

Re: Spinoff from the Eric Pepke thread - pedophiles

#385  Postby Fallible » Jan 09, 2017 8:46 pm

archibald wrote:I have read that some pedophiles report not understanding why society thinks what they do is wrong.


True. I've met some. It's just that it's not a lack of understanding shared by all paedophiles, which is what KIR is claiming.
She battled through in every kind of tribulation,
She revelled in adventure and imagination.
She never listened to no hater, liar,
Breaking boundaries and chasing fire.
Oh, my my! Oh my, she flies!
User avatar
Fallible
RS Donator
 
Name: Alice Pooper
Posts: 51607
Age: 49
Female

Country: Engerland na na
Canada (ca)
Print view this post

Re: Spinoff from the Eric Pepke thread - pedophiles

#386  Postby archibald » Jan 09, 2017 8:47 pm

Don't forget, this thing is cultural. Once upon a time, it was out in the open.
"It seems rather obvious that plants have free will. Don't know why that would be controversial."
(John Platko)
archibald
 
Posts: 10298
Male

Country: Northern Ireland
Print view this post

Re: Spinoff from the Eric Pepke thread - pedophiles

#387  Postby archibald » Jan 09, 2017 8:47 pm

Fallible wrote:
archibald wrote:I have read that some pedophiles report not understanding why society thinks what they do is wrong.


True. I've met some. It's just that it's not a lack of understanding shared by all paedophiles, which is what KIR is claiming.


Interesting phrase, 'lack of understanding'.

Sorry, I'm being deliberately controversial.
"It seems rather obvious that plants have free will. Don't know why that would be controversial."
(John Platko)
archibald
 
Posts: 10298
Male

Country: Northern Ireland
Print view this post

Re: Spinoff from the Eric Pepke thread - pedophiles

#388  Postby Keep It Real » Jan 09, 2017 8:48 pm

so i fucked up my grammer. You know what I meant - that paedophiles need be disabused of the notion that paedophilia isn't deeply wrong.

Archibald - I would say it's all paedophiles. Deep down.
Dinosaurs = atheism
User avatar
Keep It Real
Banned User
 
Posts: 9341
Age: 40

Print view this post

Re: Spinoff from the Eric Pepke thread - pedophiles

#389  Postby Fallible » Jan 09, 2017 8:49 pm

archibald wrote:Don't forget, this thing is cultural. Once upon a time, it was out in the open.
Yes. Lots of things have changed over the years. I recently heard about a way that...I think it was the Incas...would get their babies to go off to sleep which you wouldn't find on mumsnet. :?
She battled through in every kind of tribulation,
She revelled in adventure and imagination.
She never listened to no hater, liar,
Breaking boundaries and chasing fire.
Oh, my my! Oh my, she flies!
User avatar
Fallible
RS Donator
 
Name: Alice Pooper
Posts: 51607
Age: 49
Female

Country: Engerland na na
Canada (ca)
Print view this post

Re: Spinoff from the Eric Pepke thread - pedophiles

#390  Postby Fallible » Jan 09, 2017 8:50 pm

archibald wrote:
Fallible wrote:
archibald wrote:I have read that some pedophiles report not understanding why society thinks what they do is wrong.


True. I've met some. It's just that it's not a lack of understanding shared by all paedophiles, which is what KIR is claiming.


Interesting phrase, 'lack of understanding'.

Sorry, I'm being deliberately controversial.


It's your phrase.

I have read that some pedophiles report not understanding why society thinks what they do is wrong.
She battled through in every kind of tribulation,
She revelled in adventure and imagination.
She never listened to no hater, liar,
Breaking boundaries and chasing fire.
Oh, my my! Oh my, she flies!
User avatar
Fallible
RS Donator
 
Name: Alice Pooper
Posts: 51607
Age: 49
Female

Country: Engerland na na
Canada (ca)
Print view this post

Re: Spinoff from the Eric Pepke thread - pedophiles

#391  Postby archibald » Jan 09, 2017 8:50 pm

And don't forget mohhammedydaddy:

Traditional sources dictate that Aisha was six or seven years old when betrothed to Muhammad, but the marriage was not consummated until she was nine or ten years old.
"It seems rather obvious that plants have free will. Don't know why that would be controversial."
(John Platko)
archibald
 
Posts: 10298
Male

Country: Northern Ireland
Print view this post

Re: Spinoff from the Eric Pepke thread - pedophiles

#392  Postby archibald » Jan 09, 2017 8:52 pm

Fallible wrote:
archibald wrote:
Fallible wrote:
archibald wrote:I have read that some pedophiles report not understanding why society thinks what they do is wrong.


True. I've met some. It's just that it's not a lack of understanding shared by all paedophiles, which is what KIR is claiming.


Interesting phrase, 'lack of understanding'.

Sorry, I'm being deliberately controversial.


It's your phrase.


You got me. Whoops.
Last edited by archibald on Jan 09, 2017 8:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"It seems rather obvious that plants have free will. Don't know why that would be controversial."
(John Platko)
archibald
 
Posts: 10298
Male

Country: Northern Ireland
Print view this post

Re: Spinoff from the Eric Pepke thread - pedophiles

#393  Postby Fallible » Jan 09, 2017 8:53 pm

Keep It Real wrote:so i fucked up my grammer. You know what I meant - that paedophiles need be disabused of the notion that paedophilia isn't deeply wrong.


Yes, KIR, it makes perfect sense. Paedophiles need to be disabused of the notion (cured of the sickness, if you will), those poor wretched sinner sinners, which you ascribed to them yourself. You sound like a religion.

Archibald - I would say it's all paedophiles. Deep down.


So the fuck what? You say a lot of stupid things, why would the advent of one more be in any way noteworthy because you thunk it?
She battled through in every kind of tribulation,
She revelled in adventure and imagination.
She never listened to no hater, liar,
Breaking boundaries and chasing fire.
Oh, my my! Oh my, she flies!
User avatar
Fallible
RS Donator
 
Name: Alice Pooper
Posts: 51607
Age: 49
Female

Country: Engerland na na
Canada (ca)
Print view this post

Re: Spinoff from the Eric Pepke thread - pedophiles

#394  Postby archibald » Jan 09, 2017 8:55 pm

Keep It Real wrote:Archibald - I would say it's all paedophiles. Deep down.


That's gotta be unlikely and a guess, surely? For almost every state of mind there are wide varieties in the population.
Last edited by archibald on Jan 09, 2017 8:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"It seems rather obvious that plants have free will. Don't know why that would be controversial."
(John Platko)
archibald
 
Posts: 10298
Male

Country: Northern Ireland
Print view this post

Re: Spinoff from the Eric Pepke thread - pedophiles

#395  Postby Keep It Real » Jan 09, 2017 8:55 pm

Archy just agrees with me about everything! I'ts like i've got a better read sock puppet!
Dinosaurs = atheism
User avatar
Keep It Real
Banned User
 
Posts: 9341
Age: 40

Print view this post

Re: Spinoff from the Eric Pepke thread - pedophiles

#396  Postby archibald » Jan 09, 2017 8:56 pm

So, I guess one question might be...why does society think it's wrong?
"It seems rather obvious that plants have free will. Don't know why that would be controversial."
(John Platko)
archibald
 
Posts: 10298
Male

Country: Northern Ireland
Print view this post

Re: Spinoff from the Eric Pepke thread - pedophiles

#397  Postby PensivePenny » Jan 09, 2017 8:57 pm

Keep It Real wrote:imo Fallible and Thomas Eshuis, you're paedophilia enablers, both of you. You say they think paedophilia is deeply wrong, yet they do it anyway. They need be disabused of this notion. You should be sanctioned by the board admin.


My emphasis above. Do you know what an enabler is? An enabler "authorizes" one with some ability. Assuming that ability is pedophilia, you are in essence giving them the control to decide their actions. How the hell do you square that with your belief that we have no control over our actions? No one can enable anyone if you believe man has no control over his actions. Selective determinism? Wishy washy determinism? Pick a side... you can't play for both teams.
Evolution saddens me. In an environment where irrational thinking is protected, the disparity in the population rate of creationists vs that of rational thinkers, equates to a creationist win. Let's remove warning labels from products as an equalizer.
PensivePenny
 
Name: Penny
Posts: 1693
Age: 59
Female

Country: US
United States (us)
Print view this post

Re: Spinoff from the Eric Pepke thread - pedophiles

#398  Postby Fallible » Jan 09, 2017 9:00 pm

archibald wrote:
Fallible wrote:
archibald wrote:
Fallible wrote:

True. I've met some. It's just that it's not a lack of understanding shared by all paedophiles, which is what KIR is claiming.


Interesting phrase, 'lack of understanding'.

Sorry, I'm being deliberately controversial.


It's your phrase.


You got me. Whoops.

So, I guess the issue might be...why does society think it's wrong?


Physical harm to the child, lack of bodily autonomy, lack of social and sexual awareness?
She battled through in every kind of tribulation,
She revelled in adventure and imagination.
She never listened to no hater, liar,
Breaking boundaries and chasing fire.
Oh, my my! Oh my, she flies!
User avatar
Fallible
RS Donator
 
Name: Alice Pooper
Posts: 51607
Age: 49
Female

Country: Engerland na na
Canada (ca)
Print view this post

Re: Spinoff from the Eric Pepke thread - pedophiles

#399  Postby Fallible » Jan 09, 2017 9:01 pm

Keep It Real wrote:Archy just agrees with me about everything! I'ts like i've got a better read sock puppet!


Er...is this a joke?
She battled through in every kind of tribulation,
She revelled in adventure and imagination.
She never listened to no hater, liar,
Breaking boundaries and chasing fire.
Oh, my my! Oh my, she flies!
User avatar
Fallible
RS Donator
 
Name: Alice Pooper
Posts: 51607
Age: 49
Female

Country: Engerland na na
Canada (ca)
Print view this post

Re: Spinoff from the Eric Pepke thread - pedophiles

#400  Postby Fallible » Jan 09, 2017 9:02 pm

PensivePenny wrote:
Keep It Real wrote:imo Fallible and Thomas Eshuis, you're paedophilia enablers, both of you. You say they think paedophilia is deeply wrong, yet they do it anyway. They need be disabused of this notion. You should be sanctioned by the board admin.


My emphasis above. Do you know what an enabler is? An enabler "authorizes" one with some ability. Assuming that ability is pedophilia, you are in essence giving them the control to decide their actions. How the hell do you square that with your belief that we have no control over our actions? No one can enable anyone if you believe man has no control over his actions. Selective determinism? Wishy washy determinism? Pick a side... you can't play for both teams.


:lol: I love how you're not letting this go.
She battled through in every kind of tribulation,
She revelled in adventure and imagination.
She never listened to no hater, liar,
Breaking boundaries and chasing fire.
Oh, my my! Oh my, she flies!
User avatar
Fallible
RS Donator
 
Name: Alice Pooper
Posts: 51607
Age: 49
Female

Country: Engerland na na
Canada (ca)
Print view this post

PreviousNext

Return to Social Sciences & Humanities

Who is online

Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest