Onyx8 wrote:Not so much out of fashion as superseded by scientists who are better than he was. Most of what he imagined was simply wrong.

Not that he didn't help the process along, just like the scientists who hypothesised phlogiston, they were wrong but their wrong helped move us all forward in our understanding once others figured out just how they were wrong.

Absolutely agree.

The thing about big vehicles must be true, Mrs. Lak has one of these and she doesn't even have a penis.

do you have a specific purpose for owning such a vehicle though?

or, more to the point, did you buy it for her/encourage her to get it?

because that would be 'penis extension by proxy'.

Not when she bought it, she just wanted a big truck. It pulls the boat around now.

Didn't Freud have something about boats too?

Fuck, I've got TWO boats, I must be seriously deranged.

Seriously, anyone with two boats needs their head examined.

Yeah, 'cos there's nothing left of their wallet, in my experience.

laklak wrote:The thing about big vehicles must be true, Mrs. Lak has one of these and she doesn't even have a penis.

Mrs Lak lacks penis?

Goldenmane wrote:

laklak wrote:The thing about big vehicles must be true, Mrs. Lak has one of these and she doesn't even have a penis.

Mrs Lak lacks penis?

At least we do have a clue now regarding laklak's user name.

It could be conjectured, that Mr Lak has a very small penis, and the truck is a substitute. (this is meant in jest/theory)

btw: My ideas are Freudian/Pagan in nature, and not necessarily attributable to Freud himself.

Ideas? Is that what they are?

There is a strong correlation between people who drive big cars and people who have a lot of kids i.e people with lots of kids tend to drive big cars. And we know from Freud that people who drive big cars have a small penis. Hence the inescapable inference is that people with a small penis have lots of kids. From this, we can deduce an inverse correlation between penis size and fertility. Freud should have been in genetics.

hackenslash wrote:Ideas? Is that what they are?

In the same way that what I dump in the dunny of a morn is food, yeah, sure.

iamthereforeithink wrote:There is a strong correlation between people who drive big cars and people who have a lot of kids i.e people with lots of kids tend to drive big cars. And we know from Freud that people who drive big cars have a small penis. Hence the inescapable inference is that people with a small penis have lots of kids. From this, we can deduce an inverse correlation between penis size and fertility. Freud should have been in genetics.

The penis extension usually relates to flashy cars, such as the Ferrari etc.. And these cars would most certainly not be suitable for families.

Hence, your analogy is wrong.

Hmmm.. I drive a car just like this



What does this say about me, please?

Oh, except for the gold wheels, that is *shudder*

No since freud wasn't born with Ajna.

http://www.humandesign.com/ajna-center
http://www.humandesignsystem.com/archive/charts/FreudSigmund.pdf

consistency wrote:No since freud wasn't born with Ajna.

http://www.humandesign.com/ajna-center
http://www.humandesignsystem.com/archive/charts/FreudSigmund.pdf

Freud must have been wrong because a more modern set of pseudoscientific psychobabble says he was?

Weaver wrote:

consistency wrote:No since freud wasn't born with Ajna.

http://www.humandesign.com/ajna-center
http://www.humandesignsystem.com/archive/charts/FreudSigmund.pdf

Freud must have been wrong because a more modern set of pseudoscientific psychobabble says he was?

Well that and neuroscience w/o the babble. Either way he was wrong.