a step by step show and tell
Moderators: kiore, Blip, The_Metatron
laklak wrote:Is there a reason you make your own instead of buying the pre-cut ones, other than you just like making them?
Onyx8 wrote:what does sealing the glue do? Isn't the glue itself a sealant?
Alan Carruth02-26-2014, 03:49 PM
I've done the experiment.
When you push inward on the side the material in the inside face is placed under tension. Wood is not very strong at resisting this and tends to crack, starting on the inside face. A tape that's solidly glued down adds a lot of strength in that sense, thus increasing the force it takes to break the side.
I did experiments about 15 years ago, using two different side tape materials (nylon twill and cotton-polyester bias), and two different glues (hot hide glue and Titebond). I made standard samples of several different woods and broke them in a rig that allowed me to figure out how much force it took. What I found was:
1) any tape about doubled the force it took to break a sample,
2) hide glue is stronger than Titebond in this application,
3) although the nylon tape is a stronger material, it does not glue well, tending to come unstuck, allowing the samples to break, and
4) the cotton-poly tape tended to break with the wood, and withstood somewhat more force.
That's why I use cotton-poly side tapes glued on with hide glue. One drawback of that is that hide glue breaks down when exposed to air. I shellac the tapes cut that down: we'll know in 75 years or so whether it works.
Alan Carruth02-27-2014, 03:56 PM
Good questions.
Charles Tauber asked:
"Do you know at what pressure the sides in your test cracked? "
Some more detail:
The test was done using small coupons of side wood; either straight pieces from side that had cracked in bending, or similar bits of surplus sides. They were 40mm x 100mm, with the grain going the short way. The half inch wide tapes were put on using whichever glue, and then shellaced, to keep things as much as possible as they would be in a normal build. I made two samples of each case, including pieces with no tapes: a small sample, to be sure.
To test them I made a holder for two sections of 1/4" dowel, to hold them parallel 1" apart. The test piece was placed on them with the wood grain parallel to the supports, and the tape side down. A lever was made that had another piece of dowel parallel to the other two and centered between them. This applied pressure on the top of the wood. A can of marbles was slid down the lever until the test piece broke. The location of the can, along with the mechanical advantage of the lever and the tare (obtained with a gram scale) gave the force applied.
The average force required to break the 'bare' samples ranged from 2688 grams (mahogany 1.8mm thick) to 5640 grams (persimmon @ 2.0mm). For the reinforced samples the range went from 3500 grams (2.0mm padauk; bias tape and Titebond) to 7500 grams (persimmon and nylon tape with hide glue; a real outlier from the other data for some reason). I used 2.0mm IRW as the forth sample material. In general the stronger persimmon benefited relatively less from being reinforced, which I suppose is what you'd expect. I note that my recollection of 'about doubles the force' is inaccurate: it's more like a 30%-60% increase. Still useful, IMO, but I really need to be more careful in these posts in the future.
I suspect that real sides would require a lot more force to break. In that case it's hard to know if the tapes would add as much of an increment to the strength, although I'm sure they add some. OTOH, I do know from experience that tapes will stop an impact crack that starts in between them. It's a lot easier to repair a 4" long crack in a side than one that runs from block to block.
Jeff Crisp asked:
"How can you by sure that it was cross grain gluing that had caused the crack? What made these 2 guitars stand out from the numerous number of guitars you would have seen in your lifetime?"
These were imports 'fresh off the boat', that showed no signs of use, let alone abuse. They were made of a soft, light Australian wood (I don't know the species offhand). The cracks were held open, widest at the fillet location, and stopped a short distance away, where there was no reinforcement on the side that I can recall. I can't prove the fillets caused the cracks, but the circumstantial evidence is pretty strong.
Ben-Had asked:
"Alan, why do you choose tape over wood?"
I feel they're the best value for the time and effort involved. They do reinforce the sides against impact cracks; for which I have lots of other evidence besides the test cited. They are not 'bullet proof', of course, but I expect (and hope) that people who own a handmade guitar will make an effort to treat it with some respect, and not use it for impromptu stickball games. Stuff does happen, of course, but it's amazing how much punishment a guitar can take with a little help.
One of my pieces of evidence is a BRW 000 guitar I made for a friend. I used thin linen side tapes on that one. He plays a lot of nursing home gigs, and tends to walk around with the guitar across his back on the strap. The first time he brought it by for fret work I noticed white paint marks on the sides where he'd bumped into door frames, and these multiplied over the years. Finally, after almost 20 years of this, he managed to punch a 1" hole in the treble side of the upper bout between tapes. There was no crack running away from the hole, and it was a fairly easy repair, as such things go. I could multiply that story a bit.
Fillets need to be inletted into the liners to avoid creating a stress riser. It's a bit of trouble to do that neatly. Side tapes don't seem to interfere with the glue joint that I can tell. When routing for the bindings, for example, the side material does not chip away along the glue line on either side of the tapes.
One other anecdote:
After the last festival in Newport RI Mark Blanchard mailed his guitars home. The airplane carrying them went into a mountain side at high speed. Two of the guitars were thrown clear, and the Postal Service sent them to him (smelling of jet fuel). They were in good 'normal' cases (not 'flight' cases), which were, in turn, in case covers. The covers were ripped, and the cases separated at the edges around the top and back in places. The damage to the guitars was pretty amazing. Any localized mass, such as the bridge or blocks, simply sheared through whatever it was attached to, so one bridge punched cleanly through the top. The tuner shafts were bent. The sides, which had tapes, were intact, and Mark told me they were not even cracked other than where they were sheared off at the ends. Again, circumstantial, but convincing.
John Platko wrote:What I was taught by Al Carruth
Return to Technical Design and Engineering.
Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest