The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo

Nautilidae · **#41** by **Nautilidae** » Feb 03, 2012 7:57 pm

Globe wrote:I don't see the point in remaking movies....
The movie has already been made. It's out there.

The Wizard of Oz is a remake. Should that not have been made?

Scar · **#42** by **Scar** » Feb 03, 2012 7:58 pm

Enjoyed both versions greatly. Can't say which I liked more.

Globe · **#43** by **Globe** » Feb 03, 2012 8:03 pm

Nautilidae wrote:
Globe wrote:I don't see the point in remaking movies....
The movie has already been made. It's out there.

The Wizard of Oz is a remake. Should that not have been made?

I suppose you are referring to the glittering botchjob of 1939??

No. The world would have been better off without that version. :dunno:

Pulsar · **#44** by **Pulsar** » Feb 03, 2012 8:07 pm

Globe wrote:I suppose you are referring to the glittering botchjob of 1939??

No. The world would have been better off without that version.

Maybe he means this one:

Ah, Michael Jackson's finest hour :lol:

Globe · **#45** by **Globe** » Feb 03, 2012 8:20 pm

Shudders..... :what:

MacIver · **#46** by **MacIver** » Feb 03, 2012 8:26 pm

Globe wrote:
Nautilidae wrote:
Globe wrote:I don't see the point in remaking movies....
The movie has already been made. It's out there.

The Wizard of Oz is a remake. Should that not have been made?

I suppose you are referring to the glittering botchjob of 1939??

No. The world would have been better off without that version.

Remakes are made for one reason and one reason only.

Movie executives believe they are less of a risk for their production company's cash. A tried and tested idea is less likely to be a bomb. As long as the movie business is a business remakes, re-imaginings, sequels, prequels, adaptations and rip-offs will take precedence over original ideas.

Tinker Grey · **#47** by **Tinker Grey** » Feb 04, 2012 1:45 am

Pulsar wrote:
Globe wrote:I suppose you are referring to the glittering botchjob of 1939??

No. The world would have been better off without that version.

Maybe he means this one:

Ah, Michael Jackson's finest hour

Is he the one holding the dog?

Pulsar · **#48** by **Pulsar** » Feb 04, 2012 1:19 pm

Tinker Grey wrote:Is he the one holding the dog?

That's Diana Ross :lol:

Michael is the scarecrow on the right.

Animavore · **#49** by **Animavore** » Feb 04, 2012 2:46 pm

Pulsar wrote:
Globe wrote:I suppose you are referring to the glittering botchjob of 1939??

No. The world would have been better off without that version.

Maybe he means this one:

Ah, Michael Jackson's finest hour

This film again. Gave me dreams and nightmares as a child. I remember at one time I couldn't tell if seeing it was a dream itself or reality (due to the passage of time) until someone posted it here last year.

Must track down a copy :think: