One bang one process.

Discussions on astrology, homeopathy and superstition etc.

Moderators: kiore, The_Metatron, Blip

User avatar
Spearthrower
Posts: 33888
Joined: Feb 25, 2010 6:11 pm
Country: Thailand
Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร

Re: One bang one process.

Post by Spearthrower »

Posted May 13, 2011 7:12 pm

http://www.rationalskepticism.org/pseud ... ml#p846440

[quote="Spearthrower";p="846440"]
What exactly have you done in the last 2 years, Paul? Have you done any experimentation? Written any papers? Where are you published? If your idea really is so good, why aren't you working towards getting it authenticated by professionals rather than regurgitating it, full of the same nonsense 2 years ago? What a waste![/quote]

12 years later; still no experimentation, no papers, no publication...

The best explanation of this is that Paul's idea, and the idea that Paul's idea is good both exist only in Paul's head, but no one else would be justified in believing that to be true given the thousands of words of barely coherent gibberish Paul's written and perfect absence of support.

Do you imagine you could write a paper on your pet theory that would meet the criteria for publication in a scientific journal, Paul?

Do you imagine you can do that?

Or do you realize you certainly can't?

If the latter, then you must thereby also acknowledge that whatever it is you think you know is not something you can actually show others you know, and this is why you continue to fail to convince anyone that your ideas are worth anything at all.
I'm not an atheist; I just don't believe in gods :- that which I don't belong to isn't a group!
Religion: Mass Stockholm Syndrome

Learn Stuff. Stuff good. https://www.coursera.org/
pfrankinstein
Posts: 1814
Joined: Mar 27, 2011 12:42 am
Name: paul
Country: UK

Re: One bang one process.

Post by pfrankinstein »

[quote="Spearthrower";p="2794555"][quote="pfrankinstein";p="2794553"][quote="Spearthrower";p="2794549"][quote="pfrankinstein";p="2794548"]
Hark you with your misconceived notion of the data. [/quote]

Who do you think your vapid lies are fooling, Paul?

There is no fucking data; stop lying through your teeth.[/quote]

Which vapid lie are you referencing troll.

Paul.[/quote]


No need to reach far as you cited your own lie - you have ZERO data, yet you keep pretending you do.

Not only do you not have any data, never presented any data at all, but I can cite half a dozen posts of people ausking you to provide said data and you contriving some deranged diversion that always ended with no data being produced.

You want to try this, Paul - please feel free, I am right in the mood to publicly spank you right now. :)[/quote]

Publicly, in this little forum. Go for it fall guy.

Tell me again how NS is a metaphor.

Explain how Charles Darwin did not propose a process to answer the speciation question.

WE appear to be stuck in a loop. All you. Not my fault you can't grasp the basics.

PAUL.
User avatar
Spearthrower
Posts: 33888
Joined: Feb 25, 2010 6:11 pm
Country: Thailand
Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร

Re: One bang one process.

Post by Spearthrower »

[quote="pfrankinstein";p="2794557"]
Everybody can see that you are incapable of peer review. [/quote]

Posted less than 1 hour ago:

http://www.rationalskepticism.org/post2 ... w#p2794531

[quote="pfrankinstein";p="2794557"]You sir represent peer review.[/quote]

:crazy:


[quote="pfrankinstein";p="2794557"]
You are so wrapped up in your ego, add the past promotion of a kind of slang fiction, blinkerd you can not lift your head above your narrow horizen and evaluate any further. [/quote]

And your mind is just so wide and brimming with stupefaction.

Sorry I don't buy into your empty posturing and blagging at strangers on the internet. Maybe you shouldn't pretend to be something you're not?


[quote="pfrankinstein";p="2794557"]
You are little use to me in your present state, except as a fall guy i suppose.[/quote]

Only indicative of the nastiness of your mind, I'm afraid.
I'm not an atheist; I just don't believe in gods :- that which I don't belong to isn't a group!
Religion: Mass Stockholm Syndrome

Learn Stuff. Stuff good. https://www.coursera.org/
User avatar
Spearthrower
Posts: 33888
Joined: Feb 25, 2010 6:11 pm
Country: Thailand
Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร

Re: One bang one process.

Post by Spearthrower »

[quote="pfrankinstein";p="2794560"][quote="Spearthrower";p="2794555"][quote="pfrankinstein";p="2794553"][quote="Spearthrower";p="2794549"]

Who do you think your vapid lies are fooling, Paul?

There is no fucking data; stop lying through your teeth.[/quote]

Which vapid lie are you referencing troll.

Paul.[/quote]


No need to reach far as you cited your own lie - you have ZERO data, yet you keep pretending you do.

Not only do you not have any data, never presented any data at all, but I can cite half a dozen posts of people ausking you to provide said data and you contriving some deranged diversion that always ended with no data being produced.

You want to try this, Paul - please feel free, I am right in the mood to publicly spank you right now. :)[/quote]

Publicly, in this little forum. Go for it fall guy.

Tell me again how NS is a metaphor.[/quote]


See, again you're just showing yourself as being completely unable to engage in any level of honesty.

For example, I've written explaining why NS is a metaphor dozens of times, and each time you've tossed out your usual distractions.

Anyone can type in 'metaphor' and look back through the numerous instances of me attempting to provide you with some nuance and education, but you aggressively fending off ever learning anything because of your swollen ego.

http://www.rationalskepticism.org/post2 ... r#p2793805

[quote="Spearthrower";p="2794549"]Regardless, one of the many reasons why what Darwin did or didn't say is irrelevant to science (not History) is that Darwin's understanding of E&NS, while vital as a discovery, is extremely impoverished comparative to the understanding today. Darwin spoke in metaphor because of the limitations of his understanding - in many ways, there's a natural progression in discovery that starts with metaphor but becomes nomenclature as deeper understanding is discovered. Even nomenclature is quasi-metaphorical, but that's way beyond your ability do discuss. Despite Darwin publishing his idea, we no longer use any of the language he used because it is not clear enough for modern usage, it just doesn't have the resolution necessary to do any work today. Even were your witterings legible, the best they'd ever be is insufficiently specific to have any import on the subject. Go learn stuff, Paul: stuff good.[/quote]

http://www.rationalskepticism.org/post2 ... r#p2793650
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/post2 ... r#p2793103
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/post2 ... r#p2792887
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/post2 ... r#p2792850
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/post2 ... r#p2791506
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/post2 ... r#p2789864
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/post2 ... r#p2778619
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/post9 ... or#p933091
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/post9 ... or#p931764
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/post8 ... or#p893911


[quote="pfrankinstein";p="2794560"]Explain how Charles Darwin did not propose a process to answer the speciation question. [/quote]


And again, yet more examples of your own perfect lack of good faith discussion, or even basic honesty. It's all lies and bullshit with you.

http://www.rationalskepticism.org/post2 ... n#p2793545

[quote="Spearthrower";p="2794560"]Speciation wasn't actually a thing conceived of before, Darwin. That's kind of the entire point of why Darwin is remembered. For most of human history, species were seen as fixed quantities created as is.

So he didn't answer the speciation question by observing speciation, as that's just jumbled nonsense the kind of which indicates what the true state of your grasp of the topic is, but rather Darwin saw different traits in distributed populations that seemed suited - adapted to local environments, and hypothesized that not only did this come about by natural selection, but that this principle of adaptations accruing over generations could thereby provide, through extension, a naturalist account of the diversity of life.

At any point, you are perfectly free to stop pretending you know what Darwin wrote - the only way is up in this respect - not least because there is no value to you in pretending anyway - what some historical figure said about it is irrelevant, Paul. Darwin did not use the words you keep trying to put in his mouth, and you don't bolster your own ideas by repeatedly name-dropping him. What Darwin did and what you've done are not in the slightest bit analogous.[/quote]


http://www.rationalskepticism.org/post2 ... n#p2793544
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/post2 ... n#p2793243
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/post2 ... n#p2789046
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/post2 ... n#p2785988
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/post2 ... n#p2784641
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/post2 ... n#p2781286
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/post2 ... n#p2778022



[quote="pfrankinstein";p="2794560"]WE appear to be stuck in a loop. All you.[/quote]

That's because you're basically akin to an old parrot who has learned to squark out a very limited selection of humanish sounding tunes but is unable to change any of the trills, or adapt to its audience. The conversation is actually between you and your ego - we're just your dry-humping post, and guess what? We don't appreciate it in the slightest.


[quote="pfrankinstein";p="2794560"] Not my fault you can't grasp the basics.
[/quote]

The reason being that you aren't able even to achieve the basics - being so woefully ignorant isn't itself bad, but the towering ego stops you ever from moving forward.
I'm not an atheist; I just don't believe in gods :- that which I don't belong to isn't a group!
Religion: Mass Stockholm Syndrome

Learn Stuff. Stuff good. https://www.coursera.org/
User avatar
Spearthrower
Posts: 33888
Joined: Feb 25, 2010 6:11 pm
Country: Thailand
Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร

Re: One bang one process.

Post by Spearthrower »

All lies and bullshit. That's the summation of your membership here, Paul.

Essentially one thread, 12+ years, abused dozens of members here, repeated the same asinine shite over and over, and still can't grasp why you are doomed to continue failing here so abysmally.
I'm not an atheist; I just don't believe in gods :- that which I don't belong to isn't a group!
Religion: Mass Stockholm Syndrome

Learn Stuff. Stuff good. https://www.coursera.org/
pfrankinstein
Posts: 1814
Joined: Mar 27, 2011 12:42 am
Name: paul
Country: UK

Re: One bang one process.

Post by pfrankinstein »

It might occur to some that "the process of evolution" is a subject in its own right. I'd have it that way. Instead of denying fact.

The subject of "biological evolution" another complimentary subject in its own right.

Both relevent and correct.

One built around slang meaning and ambiguty, taken by the so called experts and placed on a pedastool and held up as the true "item" in its entirerty ; by misconception and ignorence.

The process of evolution is based on fact.

Paul.
pfrankinstein
Posts: 1814
Joined: Mar 27, 2011 12:42 am
Name: paul
Country: UK

Re: One bang one process.

Post by pfrankinstein »

[quote="Spearthrower";p="2794563"]All lies and bullshit. That's the summation of your membership here, Paul.

Essentially one thread, 12+ years, abused dozens of members here, repeated the same asinine shite over and over, and still can't grasp why you are doomed to continue failing here so abysmally.[/quote]

Do not presume to lecture me about abuse. From every angle you can muster, the abuse i have sufferd by your hand.

Paul.
Last edited by pfrankinstein on Jan 10, 2023 4:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Spearthrower
Posts: 33888
Joined: Feb 25, 2010 6:11 pm
Country: Thailand
Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร

Re: One bang one process.

Post by Spearthrower »

[quote="pfrankinstein";p="2794567"][quote="Spearthrower";p="2794563"]All lies and bullshit. That's the summation of your membership here, Paul.

Essentially one thread, 12+ years, abused dozens of members here, repeated the same asinine shite over and over, and still can't grasp why you are doomed to continue failing here so abysmally.[/quote]

Do not presume to lecture me about abuse. From every angle you can muster, the abuse i have sufferd at your hands.

Paul.[/quote]

Bollocks.

Anyone can look back to the first couple of dozen pages of this thread and your abusive interaction with members.

Not one of those members has posted in years, so you can't pretend it has anything to do with me, or any of the others posting today.

You were abusive to ALL of them too.

http://www.rationalskepticism.org/post8 ... ng#p832452
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/post9 ... ng#p933292
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/post8 ... ng#p897831

That's the true pattern here: blather, abuse, blag - you even were abusive and overbearing to the mods, because that's just who you are.
I'm not an atheist; I just don't believe in gods :- that which I don't belong to isn't a group!
Religion: Mass Stockholm Syndrome

Learn Stuff. Stuff good. https://www.coursera.org/
User avatar
Spearthrower
Posts: 33888
Joined: Feb 25, 2010 6:11 pm
Country: Thailand
Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร

Re: One bang one process.

Post by Spearthrower »

[quote="pfrankinstein";p="2794564"]It might occur to some that "the process of evolution" is a subject in its own right. I'd have it that way. Instead of denying fact.

The subject of "biological evolution" another complimentary subject in its own right.

Both relevent and correct.

One built around slang meaning and ambiguty, taken by the so called experts and placed on a pedastool and held up as the true "item" in its entirerty ; by misconception and ignorence.

The process of evolution is based on fact.

Paul.[/quote]


Your writing is vapid - you say nothing of substance at all.

This is why you always run away when faced with actual substance, because you just cannot match actual competence. Shall we review some more real world published papers in actual science journals? Cos we all know how well you did last time! :lol:
I'm not an atheist; I just don't believe in gods :- that which I don't belong to isn't a group!
Religion: Mass Stockholm Syndrome

Learn Stuff. Stuff good. https://www.coursera.org/
pfrankinstein
Posts: 1814
Joined: Mar 27, 2011 12:42 am
Name: paul
Country: UK

Re: One bang one process.

Post by pfrankinstein »

[quote="Spearthrower";p="2794568"][quote="pfrankinstein";p="2794567"][quote="Spearthrower";p="2794563"]All lies and bullshit. That's the summation of your membership here, Paul.

Essentially one thread, 12+ years, abused dozens of members here, repeated the same asinine shite over and over, and still can't grasp why you are doomed to continue failing here so abysmally.[/quote]

Do not presume to lecture me about abuse. From every angle you can muster, the abuse i have sufferd at your hands.

Paul.[/quote]

Bollocks.

Anyone can look back to the first couple of dozen pages of this thread and your abusive interaction with members.

Not one of those members has posted in years, so you can't pretend it has anything to do with me, or any of the others posting today.

You were abusive to ALL of them too.

http://www.rationalskepticism.org/post8 ... ng#p832452
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/post9 ... ng#p933292
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/post8 ... ng#p897831

That's the true pattern here: blather, abuse, blag - you even were abusive and overbearing to the mods, because that's just who you are.[/quote]

You troll the thread sir. Right here right now that is what you are doing. An attempt to derail.

What is Evolution?

You have the answer but you can't bring yourself to post it. You are a fake trapped by your own spin.

Your lame stance can only be defended by ignorence.

Paul.
Last edited by pfrankinstein on Jan 10, 2023 5:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Spearthrower
Posts: 33888
Joined: Feb 25, 2010 6:11 pm
Country: Thailand
Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร

Re: One bang one process.

Post by Spearthrower »

Hubris from the past

http://www.rationalskepticism.org/pseud ... ml#p895694

[quote="dinkum";p="895694"][quote="pfrankinstein";p="895483"]
*The big bang a single beginning.
[/quote]

A verb would be welcome.[/quote]


[quote="pfrankinstein";p="895733"]
The big bang [=static object] a single beginning [= verb].[/quote]

[quote="pfrankinstein";p="895780"][quote="Hollycrap";p="895740"]You can add grammar to the list of things of which you are ignorant.[/quote]


A verb, from the Latin verbum meaning word, is a word (part of speech) that in syntax conveys an action or a state of being.

Again.

The big bang [Object]... a single beginning.[verb]

Paul.[/quote]


[quote="pfrankinstein";p="895802"][quote="hackenslash";p="895790"]Bzzzzzzzzzzzz. Thank you for playing. Beginning is a noun, as indicated by the use of the indefinite article.

Still not learning, I see.[/quote]

A verb, from the Latin verbum meaning word, is a word (part of speech) that in syntax conveys an action or a state of being.

I'm describing an objects state of being.

The inderfinate article has naff all to do with anything.

Paul.[/quote]

[quote="pfrankinstein";p="895836"][quote="hackenslash";p="895811"]Absolute arse-water. When I need remedial English lessons, I'll get them from somebody who can actually string a coherent sentence together. The indefinite article has everything to do with it, because it denotes 'beginning' as a fucking noun in this context.[/quote]

Single beginning. VERB.

Paul.[/quote]


As always Paul, everyone knows you're not only wrong, but also beating your chest and blagging, refusing to acknowledge your mistake.

This is the tone of your thread throughout. You being incoherent, wrong, and obnoxious.

Everyone else was right, explained to you what was wrong, but still you insisted.

But eventually you added a verb, albeit one that contained no semantic or logical value at all 'denotes'.

There's an entire history of your malfeasance, bullshit, bravado, blagging, bluster, blather and bitching Paul. It never goes away - it's still sitting right there for anyone interested to read. So next time you try and paint yourself as a poor widdle victim, or as a great disruptive thinker - remember, we've all seen you expose what's actually true, and so the sham just can no longer hope to deceive.
I'm not an atheist; I just don't believe in gods :- that which I don't belong to isn't a group!
Religion: Mass Stockholm Syndrome

Learn Stuff. Stuff good. https://www.coursera.org/
User avatar
Spearthrower
Posts: 33888
Joined: Feb 25, 2010 6:11 pm
Country: Thailand
Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร

Re: One bang one process.

Post by Spearthrower »

[quote="pfrankinstein";p="2794572"]You troll the thread sir. Right here right now that is what you are doing. An attempt to derail.[/quote]

As usual, you run away and toss out diversions - as if anyone's deceived by your litany of bullshit.


[quote="pfrankinstein";p="2794572"]What is Evolution?

You have the answer but you can't answer, .[/quote]

Again, you're just lying at me as if I don't know that I've answered your question dozens of times.

So your manufactured diversion when caught lying is just to lie some more! :lol:

http://www.rationalskepticism.org/post2 ... n#p2793243


[quote="Spearthrower";p="2793243"][quote="pfrankinstein";p="2793241"]What is evolution? [/quote]

Feel free to read the literal litany of definitions provided to you already in this thread, and that's even before you started repetitively asking it.

Evolution is the change in the distribution of alleles in a population.[/quote]
I'm not an atheist; I just don't believe in gods :- that which I don't belong to isn't a group!
Religion: Mass Stockholm Syndrome

Learn Stuff. Stuff good. https://www.coursera.org/
pfrankinstein
Posts: 1814
Joined: Mar 27, 2011 12:42 am
Name: paul
Country: UK

Re: One bang one process.

Post by pfrankinstein »

[quote="Spearthrower";p="2794573"]Hubris from the past

http://www.rationalskepticism.org/pseud ... ml#p895694

[quote="dinkum";p="895694"][quote="pfrankinstein";p="895483"]
*The big bang a single beginning.
[/quote]

A verb would be welcome.[/quote]


[quote="pfrankinstein";p="895733"]
The big bang [=static object] a single beginning [= verb].[/quote]

[quote="pfrankinstein";p="895780"][quote="Hollycrap";p="895740"]You can add grammar to the list of things of which you are ignorant.[/quote]


A verb, from the Latin verbum meaning word, is a word (part of speech) that in syntax conveys an action or a state of being.

Again.

The big bang [Object]... a single beginning.[verb]

Paul.[/quote]


[quote="pfrankinstein";p="895802"][quote="hackenslash";p="895790"]Bzzzzzzzzzzzz. Thank you for playing. Beginning is a noun, as indicated by the use of the indefinite article.

Still not learning, I see.[/quote]

A verb, from the Latin verbum meaning word, is a word (part of speech) that in syntax conveys an action or a state of being.

I'm describing an objects state of being.

The inderfinate article has naff all to do with anything.

Paul.[/quote]

[quote="pfrankinstein";p="895836"][quote="hackenslash";p="895811"]Absolute arse-water. When I need remedial English lessons, I'll get them from somebody who can actually string a coherent sentence together. The indefinite article has everything to do with it, because it denotes 'beginning' as a fucking noun in this context.[/quote]

Single beginning. VERB.

Paul.[/quote]


As always Paul, everyone knows you're not only wrong, but also beating your chest and blagging, refusing to acknowledge your mistake.

This is the tone of your thread throughout. You being incoherent, wrong, and obnoxious.

Everyone else was right, explained to you what was wrong, but still you insisted.

But eventually you added a verb, albeit one that contained no semantic or logical value at all 'denotes'.

There's an entire history of your malfeasance, bullshit, bravado, blagging, bluster, blather and bitching Paul. It never goes away - it's still sitting right there for anyone interested to read. So next time you try and paint yourself as a poor widdle victim, or as a great disruptive thinker - remember, we've all seen you expose what's actually true, and so the sham just can no longer hope to deceive.[/quote]

Blah blah blah the writer writes. Many baffled with cleverly worded bull shit.

The statement "The big bang a single beginning denotes a single process" is forthright in construction.

It is a train of thinking, a line of enquiry. To extract additional knowledge from existing knowledge.

denote
/dɪˈnəʊt/
verb
3rd person present: denotes
be a sign of; indicate.

....... Denotes = be a sign of; indicate.

Paul.
User avatar
Spearthrower
Posts: 33888
Joined: Feb 25, 2010 6:11 pm
Country: Thailand
Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร

Re: One bang one process.

Post by Spearthrower »

[quote="pfrankinstein";p="2794575"][quote="Spearthrower";p="2794573"]Hubris from the past

http://www.rationalskepticism.org/pseud ... ml#p895694

[quote="dinkum";p="895694"][quote="pfrankinstein";p="895483"]
*The big bang a single beginning.
[/quote]

A verb would be welcome.[/quote]


[quote="pfrankinstein";p="895733"]
The big bang [=static object] a single beginning [= verb].[/quote]

[quote="pfrankinstein";p="895780"][quote="Hollycrap";p="895740"]You can add grammar to the list of things of which you are ignorant.[/quote]


A verb, from the Latin verbum meaning word, is a word (part of speech) that in syntax conveys an action or a state of being.

Again.

The big bang [Object]... a single beginning.[verb]

Paul.[/quote]


[quote="pfrankinstein";p="895802"][quote="hackenslash";p="895790"]Bzzzzzzzzzzzz. Thank you for playing. Beginning is a noun, as indicated by the use of the indefinite article.

Still not learning, I see.[/quote]

A verb, from the Latin verbum meaning word, is a word (part of speech) that in syntax conveys an action or a state of being.

I'm describing an objects state of being.

The inderfinate article has naff all to do with anything.

Paul.[/quote]

[quote="pfrankinstein";p="895836"][quote="hackenslash";p="895811"]Absolute arse-water. When I need remedial English lessons, I'll get them from somebody who can actually string a coherent sentence together. The indefinite article has everything to do with it, because it denotes 'beginning' as a fucking noun in this context.[/quote]

Single beginning. VERB.

Paul.[/quote]


As always Paul, everyone knows you're not only wrong, but also beating your chest and blagging, refusing to acknowledge your mistake.

This is the tone of your thread throughout. You being incoherent, wrong, and obnoxious.

Everyone else was right, explained to you what was wrong, but still you insisted.

But eventually you added a verb, albeit one that contained no semantic or logical value at all 'denotes'.

There's an entire history of your malfeasance, bullshit, bravado, blagging, bluster, blather and bitching Paul. It never goes away - it's still sitting right there for anyone interested to read. So next time you try and paint yourself as a poor widdle victim, or as a great disruptive thinker - remember, we've all seen you expose what's actually true, and so the sham just can no longer hope to deceive.[/quote]

Blah blah blah the writer writes. Many baffled with cleverly worded bull shit.

The statement "The big bang a single beginning denotes a single process" is forthright in construction.

It is a train of thinking, a line of enquiry. To extract additional knowledge from existing knowledge.

denote
/dɪˈnəʊt/
verb
3rd person present: denotes
be a sign of; indicate.

....... Denotes = be a sign of; indicate.

Paul.[/quote]


What you call 'blah blah blah' are actual facts, like there being a lack of verb in your initial formulation.

Whereas, what you describe of your own brilliant idea really translates to 'blah blah blah'.

It's projection, Paul.

And yes, I know what 'denotes' means, and as I already said: adding it achieved no greater semantic or logical value than the phrase absent a verb.

That's you in a nutshell - you think you shit gold.
I'm not an atheist; I just don't believe in gods :- that which I don't belong to isn't a group!
Religion: Mass Stockholm Syndrome

Learn Stuff. Stuff good. https://www.coursera.org/
User avatar
Spearthrower
Posts: 33888
Joined: Feb 25, 2010 6:11 pm
Country: Thailand
Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร

Re: One bang one process.

Post by Spearthrower »

So what's the next form of gymnastics you're going to try to evade the fact that you forgot that you've written stuff in this thread that remains for everyone to see?

http://www.rationalskepticism.org/post2 ... l#p2794562
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/post2 ... l#p2794574

Lie after lie after lie - is your lack of honesty meant to be persuasive somehow? Do you think that pretending I've not just exposed those lies will somehow mean that people forget? How exactly do you think this all works?
Last edited by Spearthrower on Jan 10, 2023 6:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I'm not an atheist; I just don't believe in gods :- that which I don't belong to isn't a group!
Religion: Mass Stockholm Syndrome

Learn Stuff. Stuff good. https://www.coursera.org/
pfrankinstein
Posts: 1814
Joined: Mar 27, 2011 12:42 am
Name: paul
Country: UK

Re: One bang one process.

Post by pfrankinstein »

thrower As always Paul, everyone knows you're not only wrong, but also beating your chest and blagging, refusing to acknowledge your mistake. snip.

Be specific sir, my mistake. How can I defend my mistake if you refuse to explain exactly what you mean.

If you see my facts as untrue you should address them directly instead of wasting my time fall guy.

Paul.
pfrankinstein
Posts: 1814
Joined: Mar 27, 2011 12:42 am
Name: paul
Country: UK

Re: One bang one process.

Post by pfrankinstein »

Lie after lie. Blah blah blah pass me another writer this one seems to be broken.

Paul
User avatar
Spearthrower
Posts: 33888
Joined: Feb 25, 2010 6:11 pm
Country: Thailand
Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร

Re: One bang one process.

Post by Spearthrower »

[quote="pfrankinstein";p="2794578"]thrower As always Paul, everyone knows you're not only wrong, but also beating your chest and blagging, refusing to acknowledge your mistake. snip.

Be specific sir, my mistake. How can I defend my mistake if you refuse to explain exactly what you mean.[/quote]

Lying again? It's in the post you're replying to! :doh:




[quote="pfrankinstein";p="2794578"]If you see my facts as untrue you should address them directly instead of wasting my time fall guy.

Paul.[/quote]

There are no such thing as untrue facts, Paul.

And I've addressed them directly - it's you who fails dramatically in every instance ever to engage in substance.
I'm not an atheist; I just don't believe in gods :- that which I don't belong to isn't a group!
Religion: Mass Stockholm Syndrome

Learn Stuff. Stuff good. https://www.coursera.org/
User avatar
Spearthrower
Posts: 33888
Joined: Feb 25, 2010 6:11 pm
Country: Thailand
Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร

Re: One bang one process.

Post by Spearthrower »

[quote="pfrankinstein";p="2794579"]Lie after lie. Blah blah blah pass me another writer this one seems to be broken.

Paul[/quote]


This one's just provided sufficient evidence to support their accusation of your incessant lying.
I'm not an atheist; I just don't believe in gods :- that which I don't belong to isn't a group!
Religion: Mass Stockholm Syndrome

Learn Stuff. Stuff good. https://www.coursera.org/
User avatar
Spearthrower
Posts: 33888
Joined: Feb 25, 2010 6:11 pm
Country: Thailand
Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร

Re: One bang one process.

Post by Spearthrower »

Fall guy - guess this is another projection.

Your first was 'simpletons'.

Your failings are catalogued here essentially forever Paul - the only escape you'll have in this life is if the forum closes down.
I'm not an atheist; I just don't believe in gods :- that which I don't belong to isn't a group!
Religion: Mass Stockholm Syndrome

Learn Stuff. Stuff good. https://www.coursera.org/
Locked