Doctor Who [SPOILERS]

Discuss Film & TV related topics here.

Moderators: kiore, The_Metatron, Blip

User avatar
Agi Hammerthief
Posts: 3325
Joined: Feb 25, 2010 7:50 pm
Country: .de
Location: .de

Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]

Post by Agi Hammerthief »

[quote="OlivierK";p="2659897"]My teenage kids were just about at the point of throwing things at the television as the characters droned on with stating-the-bleeding-obvious exposition on the bus at the top of their voices, while everyone else in the scene acted as if the Doctor&Co weren't even there. [...] There were lots of shouts of "They can all hear you!" and facepalming.[/quote]
if they had played a 60s public bus engine sounds at full volume the other passengers wouldn’t have heard a thing.
and neither would the audience.
* my (modified) emphasis ( or 'interpretation' )
User avatar
Thomas Eshuis
Posts: 31091
Joined: Jan 30, 2012 5:22 am
Name: Thomas Eshuis
Country: Netherlands

Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]

Post by Thomas Eshuis »

[quote="Agi Hammerthief";p="2660023"][quote="OlivierK";p="2659897"]My teenage kids were just about at the point of throwing things at the television as the characters droned on with stating-the-bleeding-obvious exposition on the bus at the top of their voices, while everyone else in the scene acted as if the Doctor&Co weren't even there. [...] There were lots of shouts of "They can all hear you!" and facepalming.[/quote]
if they had played a 60s public bus engine sounds at full volume the other passengers wouldn’t have heard a thing.
and neither would the audience.[/quote]
I think you may be missing the point. Oliver seems to be referring to the fact that the Doctor and Co openly discuss time-travel and the upcoming historical events within clear earshot of the contemporary people.
"Respect for personal beliefs = "I am going to tell you all what I think of YOU, but don't dare retort and tell what you think of ME because...it's my personal belief". Hmm. A bully's charter and no mistake."
User avatar
Agi Hammerthief
Posts: 3325
Joined: Feb 25, 2010 7:50 pm
Country: .de
Location: .de

Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]

Post by Agi Hammerthief »

[quote="Thomas Eshuis";p="2660032"][quote="Agi Hammerthief";p="2660023"][quote="OlivierK";p="2659897"]My teenage kids were just about at the point of throwing things at the television as the characters droned on with stating-the-bleeding-obvious exposition on the bus at the top of their voices, while everyone else in the scene acted as if the Doctor&Co weren't even there. [...] There were lots of shouts of "They can all hear you!" and facepalming.[/quote]
if they had played a 60s public bus engine sounds at full volume the other passengers wouldn’t have heard a thing.
and neither would the audience.[/quote]
I think you may be missing the point. Oliver seems to be referring to the fact that the Doctor and Co openly discuss time-travel and the upcoming historical events within clear earshot of the contemporary people.[/quote]
yes, I got that.
my point is with realistic background audio it wouldn’t have been within earshot.
* my (modified) emphasis ( or 'interpretation' )
User avatar
Thomas Eshuis
Posts: 31091
Joined: Jan 30, 2012 5:22 am
Name: Thomas Eshuis
Country: Netherlands

Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]

Post by Thomas Eshuis »

[quote="Agi Hammerthief";p="2660092"][quote="Thomas Eshuis";p="2660032"][quote="Agi Hammerthief";p="2660023"][quote="OlivierK";p="2659897"]My teenage kids were just about at the point of throwing things at the television as the characters droned on with stating-the-bleeding-obvious exposition on the bus at the top of their voices, while everyone else in the scene acted as if the Doctor&Co weren't even there. [...] There were lots of shouts of "They can all hear you!" and facepalming.[/quote]
if they had played a 60s public bus engine sounds at full volume the other passengers wouldn’t have heard a thing.
and neither would the audience.[/quote]
I think you may be missing the point. Oliver seems to be referring to the fact that the Doctor and Co openly discuss time-travel and the upcoming historical events within clear earshot of the contemporary people.[/quote]
yes, I got that.
my point is with realistic background audio it wouldn’t have been within earshot.[/quote]
But that's seems a non-sequitur response as there was no criticism of the lack of background noise.
"Respect for personal beliefs = "I am going to tell you all what I think of YOU, but don't dare retort and tell what you think of ME because...it's my personal belief". Hmm. A bully's charter and no mistake."
User avatar
Agi Hammerthief
Posts: 3325
Joined: Feb 25, 2010 7:50 pm
Country: .de
Location: .de

Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]

Post by Agi Hammerthief »

[quote="Thomas Eshuis*";p="2660102"][quote="Agi Hammerthief";p="2660092"][quote="Thomas Eshuis";p="2660032"][quote="Agi Hammerthief";p="2660023"]
if they had played a 60s public bus engine sounds at full volume the other passengers wouldn’t have heard a thing.
and neither would the audience.[/quote]
I think you may be missing the point. Oliver seems to be referring to the fact that the Doctor and Co openly discuss time-travel and the upcoming historical events within clear earshot of the contemporary people.[/quote]
yes, I got that.
my point is with realistic background audio it wouldn’t have been within earshot.[/quote]
But that's seems a non-sequitur response as there was no criticism of the lack of background noise.[/quote]
also kind of my point :naughty2:

they where „openly“ discussing things in an environment where realistically „within earshot“ is the person next to you.
So complain about the mixing of the sound, not the script.

unless they actually drove around a vintage bus to do the shoot and I‘m totally off with my assessment of 60s public transportation infrastructure quality.

of cause they could have lapshaded the noise by having (retired bus driver) Graham commenting on how much quieter modern busses are or something.
* my (modified) emphasis ( or 'interpretation' )
User avatar
Thomas Eshuis
Posts: 31091
Joined: Jan 30, 2012 5:22 am
Name: Thomas Eshuis
Country: Netherlands

Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]

Post by Thomas Eshuis »

[quote="Agi Hammerthief";p="2660112"][quote="Thomas Eshuis*";p="2660102"][quote="Agi Hammerthief";p="2660092"][quote="Thomas Eshuis";p="2660032"]
I think you may be missing the point. Oliver seems to be referring to the fact that the Doctor and Co openly discuss time-travel and the upcoming historical events within clear earshot of the contemporary people.[/quote]
yes, I got that.
my point is with realistic background audio it wouldn’t have been within earshot.[/quote]
But that's seems a non-sequitur response as there was no criticism of the lack of background noise.[/quote]
also kind of my point :naughty2:

they where „openly“ discussing things in an environment where realistically „within earshot“ is the person next to you.
So complain about the mixing of the sound, not the script.

unless they actually drove around a vintage bus to do the shoot and I‘m totally off with my assessment of 60s public transportation infrastructure quality.

of cause they could have lapshaded the noise by having (retired bus driver) Graham commenting on how much quieter modern busses are or something.[/quote]
I see.
"Respect for personal beliefs = "I am going to tell you all what I think of YOU, but don't dare retort and tell what you think of ME because...it's my personal belief". Hmm. A bully's charter and no mistake."
User avatar
electricwhiteboy
Posts: 1331
Joined: Oct 29, 2010 9:30 am

Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]

Post by electricwhiteboy »

Oh thought I'd already posted. Seems I just went through the usual oh new show runner, first episode, new Doctor jitters. The rest haven't been bad, just hope Chibbers run of form continues. Bradley Walsh has sort of been my Donna this season. Not as good as Bernard Cribbins, but not as bad as he could have been. I've been pleasantly surprised other than a few niggles.
User avatar
Agi Hammerthief
Posts: 3325
Joined: Feb 25, 2010 7:50 pm
Country: .de
Location: .de

Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]

Post by Agi Hammerthief »

now I want a crossover Pting & Cybermen or Pting & Dalek
* my (modified) emphasis ( or 'interpretation' )
User avatar
Thomas Eshuis
Posts: 31091
Joined: Jan 30, 2012 5:22 am
Name: Thomas Eshuis
Country: Netherlands

Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]

Post by Thomas Eshuis »

[quote="Agi Hammerthief";p="2661419"]now I want a crossover Pting & Cybermen or Pting & Dalek[/quote]
Really meh episode imo.
Loved Demons of Punjab though. Rosa should have been more like this.
"Respect for personal beliefs = "I am going to tell you all what I think of YOU, but don't dare retort and tell what you think of ME because...it's my personal belief". Hmm. A bully's charter and no mistake."
User avatar
Agi Hammerthief
Posts: 3325
Joined: Feb 25, 2010 7:50 pm
Country: .de
Location: .de

Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]

Post by Agi Hammerthief »

[quote="Thomas Eshuis";p="2662704"][quote="Agi Hammerthief";p="2661419"]now I want a crossover Pting & Cybermen or Pting & Dalek[/quote]
Really meh episode imo.[/quote]
yeah, insted of the general going „it ate me fleet“ would have been more impressive to have picked it up in a dalek fleet wreackage.
Doctor: „I wonder what destroyed these?“
Pting: „burp“
* my (modified) emphasis ( or 'interpretation' )
User avatar
Thomas Eshuis
Posts: 31091
Joined: Jan 30, 2012 5:22 am
Name: Thomas Eshuis
Country: Netherlands

Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]

Post by Thomas Eshuis »

[quote="Agi Hammerthief";p="2662771"][quote="Thomas Eshuis";p="2662704"][quote="Agi Hammerthief";p="2661419"]now I want a crossover Pting & Cybermen or Pting & Dalek[/quote]
Really meh episode imo.[/quote]
yeah, insted of the general going „it ate me fleet“ would have been more impressive to have picked it up in a dalek fleet wreackage.
Doctor: „I wonder what destroyed these?“
Pting: „burp“[/quote]
Not sure if you're being sarcastic, but that would have been an improvement imo.
"Respect for personal beliefs = "I am going to tell you all what I think of YOU, but don't dare retort and tell what you think of ME because...it's my personal belief". Hmm. A bully's charter and no mistake."
User avatar
Agi Hammerthief
Posts: 3325
Joined: Feb 25, 2010 7:50 pm
Country: .de
Location: .de

Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]

Post by Agi Hammerthief »

[quote="Thomas Eshuis";p="2662772"][quote="Agi Hammerthief";p="2662771"][quote="Thomas Eshuis";p="2662704"][quote="Agi Hammerthief";p="2661419"]now I want a crossover Pting & Cybermen or Pting & Dalek[/quote]
Really meh episode imo.[/quote]
yeah, insted of the general going „it ate me fleet“ would have been more impressive to have picked it up in a dalek fleet wreackage.
Doctor: „I wonder what destroyed these?“
Pting: „burp“[/quote]
Not sure if you're being sarcastic, but that would have been an improvement imo.[/quote]
that was sarcasm free.

[quote="Thomas Eshuis";p="2662704"]Loved Demons of Punjab though. Rosa should have been more like this.[/quote]
just got around to watch it, totally agree.

Those guys haven’t heared of Testemony I guess.

„It’s not an evil plot, I don’t know what to do“
now she knows
* my (modified) emphasis ( or 'interpretation' )
User avatar
Thomas Eshuis
Posts: 31091
Joined: Jan 30, 2012 5:22 am
Name: Thomas Eshuis
Country: Netherlands

Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]

Post by Thomas Eshuis »

[quote="Agi Hammerthief";p="2662780"][quote="Thomas Eshuis";p="2662772"][quote="Agi Hammerthief";p="2662771"][quote="Thomas Eshuis";p="2662704"]
Really meh episode imo.[/quote]
yeah, insted of the general going „it ate me fleet“ would have been more impressive to have picked it up in a dalek fleet wreackage.
Doctor: „I wonder what destroyed these?“
Pting: „burp“[/quote]
Not sure if you're being sarcastic, but that would have been an improvement imo.[/quote]
that was sarcasm free.[/quote]
:thumbup:

[quote="Agi Hammerthief";p="2662780"]
[quote="Thomas Eshuis";p="2662704"]Loved Demons of Punjab though. Rosa should have been more like this.[/quote]
just got around to watch it, totally agree.

Those guys haven’t heared of Testemony I guess.

„It’s not an evil plot, I don’t know what to do“
now she knows[/quote]
I don't get the reference. :ask:
"Respect for personal beliefs = "I am going to tell you all what I think of YOU, but don't dare retort and tell what you think of ME because...it's my personal belief". Hmm. A bully's charter and no mistake."
User avatar
Agi Hammerthief
Posts: 3325
Joined: Feb 25, 2010 7:50 pm
Country: .de
Location: .de

Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]

Post by Agi Hammerthief »

Xmas Special „Twice Upon A Time“
when he discovered that the aliens aren‘t ailiens and not evil.
just collectors of memories.
* my (modified) emphasis ( or 'interpretation' )
User avatar
Thomas Eshuis
Posts: 31091
Joined: Jan 30, 2012 5:22 am
Name: Thomas Eshuis
Country: Netherlands

Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]

Post by Thomas Eshuis »

[quote="Agi Hammerthief";p="2662891"]Xmas Special „Twice Upon A Time“
when he discovered that the aliens aren‘t ailiens and not evil.
just collectors of memories.[/quote]
Ah, I see, completely forgot about that point. :facepalm:
"Respect for personal beliefs = "I am going to tell you all what I think of YOU, but don't dare retort and tell what you think of ME because...it's my personal belief". Hmm. A bully's charter and no mistake."
User avatar
minininja
Posts: 1597
Joined: Jul 05, 2013 11:28 pm

Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]

Post by minininja »

They're really not holding back on violent deaths of innocent and likeable characters this series are they? It's brutal. :smoke:
[Disclaimer - if this is comes across like I think I know what I'm talking about, I want to make it clear that I don't. I'm just trying to get my thoughts down]
User avatar
Agi Hammerthief
Posts: 3325
Joined: Feb 25, 2010 7:50 pm
Country: .de
Location: .de

Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]

Post by Agi Hammerthief »

[quote="minininja";p="2663435"]They're really not holding back on violent deaths of innocent and likeable characters this series are they? It's brutal. :smoke:[/quote]
yep, unfortunately unnecessary in this case.

and it was a bit obvious that the System was asking for help.
so obvious they had to lampshade why she didn’t get it.
* my (modified) emphasis ( or 'interpretation' )
User avatar
minininja
Posts: 1597
Joined: Jul 05, 2013 11:28 pm

Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]

Post by minininja »

Ds4EMaGWsAE11U1.jpg
Just in case anybody needs a copy. :lol:
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
[Disclaimer - if this is comes across like I think I know what I'm talking about, I want to make it clear that I don't. I'm just trying to get my thoughts down]
User avatar
Thomas Eshuis
Posts: 31091
Joined: Jan 30, 2012 5:22 am
Name: Thomas Eshuis
Country: Netherlands

Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]

Post by Thomas Eshuis »

This week's episode was the least of the bunch so far, imo.
Even the Pting episode manage to keep me entertained.
The king was way to hammy and rather superfluous. And I felt no investment in the monster of this week.
Finally, as several reviews have noted; the dialogue in this episode was repetitive and to expositional.
"Respect for personal beliefs = "I am going to tell you all what I think of YOU, but don't dare retort and tell what you think of ME because...it's my personal belief". Hmm. A bully's charter and no mistake."
User avatar
electricwhiteboy
Posts: 1331
Joined: Oct 29, 2010 9:30 am

Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]

Post by electricwhiteboy »

[quote="Thomas Eshuis";p="2664514"]
The king was way to hammy and rather superfluous [/quote]

There's a fair chance that was what King James VI was actually like.
Post Reply