Doctor Who [SPOILERS]
Moderators: kiore, The_Metatron, Blip
- Agi Hammerthief
- Posts: 3325
- Joined: Feb 25, 2010 7:50 pm
- Country: .de
- Location: .de
Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]
[quote="OlivierK";p="2659897"]My teenage kids were just about at the point of throwing things at the television as the characters droned on with stating-the-bleeding-obvious exposition on the bus at the top of their voices, while everyone else in the scene acted as if the Doctor&Co weren't even there. [...] There were lots of shouts of "They can all hear you!" and facepalming.[/quote]
if they had played a 60s public bus engine sounds at full volume the other passengers wouldn’t have heard a thing.
and neither would the audience.
if they had played a 60s public bus engine sounds at full volume the other passengers wouldn’t have heard a thing.
and neither would the audience.
* my (modified) emphasis ( or 'interpretation' )
- Thomas Eshuis
- Posts: 31091
- Joined: Jan 30, 2012 5:22 am
- Name: Thomas Eshuis
- Country: Netherlands
Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]
[quote="Agi Hammerthief";p="2660023"][quote="OlivierK";p="2659897"]My teenage kids were just about at the point of throwing things at the television as the characters droned on with stating-the-bleeding-obvious exposition on the bus at the top of their voices, while everyone else in the scene acted as if the Doctor&Co weren't even there. [...] There were lots of shouts of "They can all hear you!" and facepalming.[/quote]
if they had played a 60s public bus engine sounds at full volume the other passengers wouldn’t have heard a thing.
and neither would the audience.[/quote]
I think you may be missing the point. Oliver seems to be referring to the fact that the Doctor and Co openly discuss time-travel and the upcoming historical events within clear earshot of the contemporary people.
if they had played a 60s public bus engine sounds at full volume the other passengers wouldn’t have heard a thing.
and neither would the audience.[/quote]
I think you may be missing the point. Oliver seems to be referring to the fact that the Doctor and Co openly discuss time-travel and the upcoming historical events within clear earshot of the contemporary people.
"Respect for personal beliefs = "I am going to tell you all what I think of YOU, but don't dare retort and tell what you think of ME because...it's my personal belief". Hmm. A bully's charter and no mistake."
- Agi Hammerthief
- Posts: 3325
- Joined: Feb 25, 2010 7:50 pm
- Country: .de
- Location: .de
Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]
[quote="Thomas Eshuis";p="2660032"][quote="Agi Hammerthief";p="2660023"][quote="OlivierK";p="2659897"]My teenage kids were just about at the point of throwing things at the television as the characters droned on with stating-the-bleeding-obvious exposition on the bus at the top of their voices, while everyone else in the scene acted as if the Doctor&Co weren't even there. [...] There were lots of shouts of "They can all hear you!" and facepalming.[/quote]
if they had played a 60s public bus engine sounds at full volume the other passengers wouldn’t have heard a thing.
and neither would the audience.[/quote]
I think you may be missing the point. Oliver seems to be referring to the fact that the Doctor and Co openly discuss time-travel and the upcoming historical events within clear earshot of the contemporary people.[/quote]
yes, I got that.
my point is with realistic background audio it wouldn’t have been within earshot.
if they had played a 60s public bus engine sounds at full volume the other passengers wouldn’t have heard a thing.
and neither would the audience.[/quote]
I think you may be missing the point. Oliver seems to be referring to the fact that the Doctor and Co openly discuss time-travel and the upcoming historical events within clear earshot of the contemporary people.[/quote]
yes, I got that.
my point is with realistic background audio it wouldn’t have been within earshot.
* my (modified) emphasis ( or 'interpretation' )
- Thomas Eshuis
- Posts: 31091
- Joined: Jan 30, 2012 5:22 am
- Name: Thomas Eshuis
- Country: Netherlands
Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]
[quote="Agi Hammerthief";p="2660092"][quote="Thomas Eshuis";p="2660032"][quote="Agi Hammerthief";p="2660023"][quote="OlivierK";p="2659897"]My teenage kids were just about at the point of throwing things at the television as the characters droned on with stating-the-bleeding-obvious exposition on the bus at the top of their voices, while everyone else in the scene acted as if the Doctor&Co weren't even there. [...] There were lots of shouts of "They can all hear you!" and facepalming.[/quote]
if they had played a 60s public bus engine sounds at full volume the other passengers wouldn’t have heard a thing.
and neither would the audience.[/quote]
I think you may be missing the point. Oliver seems to be referring to the fact that the Doctor and Co openly discuss time-travel and the upcoming historical events within clear earshot of the contemporary people.[/quote]
yes, I got that.
my point is with realistic background audio it wouldn’t have been within earshot.[/quote]
But that's seems a non-sequitur response as there was no criticism of the lack of background noise.
if they had played a 60s public bus engine sounds at full volume the other passengers wouldn’t have heard a thing.
and neither would the audience.[/quote]
I think you may be missing the point. Oliver seems to be referring to the fact that the Doctor and Co openly discuss time-travel and the upcoming historical events within clear earshot of the contemporary people.[/quote]
yes, I got that.
my point is with realistic background audio it wouldn’t have been within earshot.[/quote]
But that's seems a non-sequitur response as there was no criticism of the lack of background noise.
"Respect for personal beliefs = "I am going to tell you all what I think of YOU, but don't dare retort and tell what you think of ME because...it's my personal belief". Hmm. A bully's charter and no mistake."
- Agi Hammerthief
- Posts: 3325
- Joined: Feb 25, 2010 7:50 pm
- Country: .de
- Location: .de
Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]
[quote="Thomas Eshuis*";p="2660102"][quote="Agi Hammerthief";p="2660092"][quote="Thomas Eshuis";p="2660032"][quote="Agi Hammerthief";p="2660023"]
if they had played a 60s public bus engine sounds at full volume the other passengers wouldn’t have heard a thing.
and neither would the audience.[/quote]
I think you may be missing the point. Oliver seems to be referring to the fact that the Doctor and Co openly discuss time-travel and the upcoming historical events within clear earshot of the contemporary people.[/quote]
yes, I got that.
my point is with realistic background audio it wouldn’t have been within earshot.[/quote]
But that's seems a non-sequitur response as there was no criticism of the lack of background noise.[/quote]
also kind of my point
they where „openly“ discussing things in an environment where realistically „within earshot“ is the person next to you.
So complain about the mixing of the sound, not the script.
unless they actually drove around a vintage bus to do the shoot and I‘m totally off with my assessment of 60s public transportation infrastructure quality.
of cause they could have lapshaded the noise by having (retired bus driver) Graham commenting on how much quieter modern busses are or something.
if they had played a 60s public bus engine sounds at full volume the other passengers wouldn’t have heard a thing.
and neither would the audience.[/quote]
I think you may be missing the point. Oliver seems to be referring to the fact that the Doctor and Co openly discuss time-travel and the upcoming historical events within clear earshot of the contemporary people.[/quote]
yes, I got that.
my point is with realistic background audio it wouldn’t have been within earshot.[/quote]
But that's seems a non-sequitur response as there was no criticism of the lack of background noise.[/quote]
also kind of my point
they where „openly“ discussing things in an environment where realistically „within earshot“ is the person next to you.
So complain about the mixing of the sound, not the script.
unless they actually drove around a vintage bus to do the shoot and I‘m totally off with my assessment of 60s public transportation infrastructure quality.
of cause they could have lapshaded the noise by having (retired bus driver) Graham commenting on how much quieter modern busses are or something.
* my (modified) emphasis ( or 'interpretation' )
- Thomas Eshuis
- Posts: 31091
- Joined: Jan 30, 2012 5:22 am
- Name: Thomas Eshuis
- Country: Netherlands
Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]
[quote="Agi Hammerthief";p="2660112"][quote="Thomas Eshuis*";p="2660102"][quote="Agi Hammerthief";p="2660092"][quote="Thomas Eshuis";p="2660032"]
I think you may be missing the point. Oliver seems to be referring to the fact that the Doctor and Co openly discuss time-travel and the upcoming historical events within clear earshot of the contemporary people.[/quote]
yes, I got that.
my point is with realistic background audio it wouldn’t have been within earshot.[/quote]
But that's seems a non-sequitur response as there was no criticism of the lack of background noise.[/quote]
also kind of my point
they where „openly“ discussing things in an environment where realistically „within earshot“ is the person next to you.
So complain about the mixing of the sound, not the script.
unless they actually drove around a vintage bus to do the shoot and I‘m totally off with my assessment of 60s public transportation infrastructure quality.
of cause they could have lapshaded the noise by having (retired bus driver) Graham commenting on how much quieter modern busses are or something.[/quote]
I see.
I think you may be missing the point. Oliver seems to be referring to the fact that the Doctor and Co openly discuss time-travel and the upcoming historical events within clear earshot of the contemporary people.[/quote]
yes, I got that.
my point is with realistic background audio it wouldn’t have been within earshot.[/quote]
But that's seems a non-sequitur response as there was no criticism of the lack of background noise.[/quote]
also kind of my point
they where „openly“ discussing things in an environment where realistically „within earshot“ is the person next to you.
So complain about the mixing of the sound, not the script.
unless they actually drove around a vintage bus to do the shoot and I‘m totally off with my assessment of 60s public transportation infrastructure quality.
of cause they could have lapshaded the noise by having (retired bus driver) Graham commenting on how much quieter modern busses are or something.[/quote]
I see.
"Respect for personal beliefs = "I am going to tell you all what I think of YOU, but don't dare retort and tell what you think of ME because...it's my personal belief". Hmm. A bully's charter and no mistake."
- electricwhiteboy
- Posts: 1331
- Joined: Oct 29, 2010 9:30 am
Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]
Oh thought I'd already posted. Seems I just went through the usual oh new show runner, first episode, new Doctor jitters. The rest haven't been bad, just hope Chibbers run of form continues. Bradley Walsh has sort of been my Donna this season. Not as good as Bernard Cribbins, but not as bad as he could have been. I've been pleasantly surprised other than a few niggles.
- Agi Hammerthief
- Posts: 3325
- Joined: Feb 25, 2010 7:50 pm
- Country: .de
- Location: .de
Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]
now I want a crossover Pting & Cybermen or Pting & Dalek
* my (modified) emphasis ( or 'interpretation' )
- Thomas Eshuis
- Posts: 31091
- Joined: Jan 30, 2012 5:22 am
- Name: Thomas Eshuis
- Country: Netherlands
Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]
[quote="Agi Hammerthief";p="2661419"]now I want a crossover Pting & Cybermen or Pting & Dalek[/quote]
Really meh episode imo.
Loved Demons of Punjab though. Rosa should have been more like this.
Really meh episode imo.
Loved Demons of Punjab though. Rosa should have been more like this.
"Respect for personal beliefs = "I am going to tell you all what I think of YOU, but don't dare retort and tell what you think of ME because...it's my personal belief". Hmm. A bully's charter and no mistake."
- Agi Hammerthief
- Posts: 3325
- Joined: Feb 25, 2010 7:50 pm
- Country: .de
- Location: .de
Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]
[quote="Thomas Eshuis";p="2662704"][quote="Agi Hammerthief";p="2661419"]now I want a crossover Pting & Cybermen or Pting & Dalek[/quote]
Really meh episode imo.[/quote]
yeah, insted of the general going „it ate me fleet“ would have been more impressive to have picked it up in a dalek fleet wreackage.
Doctor: „I wonder what destroyed these?“
Pting: „burp“
Really meh episode imo.[/quote]
yeah, insted of the general going „it ate me fleet“ would have been more impressive to have picked it up in a dalek fleet wreackage.
Doctor: „I wonder what destroyed these?“
Pting: „burp“
* my (modified) emphasis ( or 'interpretation' )
- Thomas Eshuis
- Posts: 31091
- Joined: Jan 30, 2012 5:22 am
- Name: Thomas Eshuis
- Country: Netherlands
Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]
[quote="Agi Hammerthief";p="2662771"][quote="Thomas Eshuis";p="2662704"][quote="Agi Hammerthief";p="2661419"]now I want a crossover Pting & Cybermen or Pting & Dalek[/quote]
Really meh episode imo.[/quote]
yeah, insted of the general going „it ate me fleet“ would have been more impressive to have picked it up in a dalek fleet wreackage.
Doctor: „I wonder what destroyed these?“
Pting: „burp“[/quote]
Not sure if you're being sarcastic, but that would have been an improvement imo.
Really meh episode imo.[/quote]
yeah, insted of the general going „it ate me fleet“ would have been more impressive to have picked it up in a dalek fleet wreackage.
Doctor: „I wonder what destroyed these?“
Pting: „burp“[/quote]
Not sure if you're being sarcastic, but that would have been an improvement imo.
"Respect for personal beliefs = "I am going to tell you all what I think of YOU, but don't dare retort and tell what you think of ME because...it's my personal belief". Hmm. A bully's charter and no mistake."
- Agi Hammerthief
- Posts: 3325
- Joined: Feb 25, 2010 7:50 pm
- Country: .de
- Location: .de
Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]
[quote="Thomas Eshuis";p="2662772"][quote="Agi Hammerthief";p="2662771"][quote="Thomas Eshuis";p="2662704"][quote="Agi Hammerthief";p="2661419"]now I want a crossover Pting & Cybermen or Pting & Dalek[/quote]
Really meh episode imo.[/quote]
yeah, insted of the general going „it ate me fleet“ would have been more impressive to have picked it up in a dalek fleet wreackage.
Doctor: „I wonder what destroyed these?“
Pting: „burp“[/quote]
Not sure if you're being sarcastic, but that would have been an improvement imo.[/quote]
that was sarcasm free.
[quote="Thomas Eshuis";p="2662704"]Loved Demons of Punjab though. Rosa should have been more like this.[/quote]
just got around to watch it, totally agree.
Those guys haven’t heared of Testemony I guess.
„It’s not an evil plot, I don’t know what to do“
now she knows
Really meh episode imo.[/quote]
yeah, insted of the general going „it ate me fleet“ would have been more impressive to have picked it up in a dalek fleet wreackage.
Doctor: „I wonder what destroyed these?“
Pting: „burp“[/quote]
Not sure if you're being sarcastic, but that would have been an improvement imo.[/quote]
that was sarcasm free.
[quote="Thomas Eshuis";p="2662704"]Loved Demons of Punjab though. Rosa should have been more like this.[/quote]
just got around to watch it, totally agree.
Those guys haven’t heared of Testemony I guess.
„It’s not an evil plot, I don’t know what to do“
now she knows
* my (modified) emphasis ( or 'interpretation' )
- Thomas Eshuis
- Posts: 31091
- Joined: Jan 30, 2012 5:22 am
- Name: Thomas Eshuis
- Country: Netherlands
Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]
[quote="Agi Hammerthief";p="2662780"][quote="Thomas Eshuis";p="2662772"][quote="Agi Hammerthief";p="2662771"][quote="Thomas Eshuis";p="2662704"]
Really meh episode imo.[/quote]
yeah, insted of the general going „it ate me fleet“ would have been more impressive to have picked it up in a dalek fleet wreackage.
Doctor: „I wonder what destroyed these?“
Pting: „burp“[/quote]
Not sure if you're being sarcastic, but that would have been an improvement imo.[/quote]
that was sarcasm free.[/quote]
[quote="Agi Hammerthief";p="2662780"]
[quote="Thomas Eshuis";p="2662704"]Loved Demons of Punjab though. Rosa should have been more like this.[/quote]
just got around to watch it, totally agree.
Those guys haven’t heared of Testemony I guess.
„It’s not an evil plot, I don’t know what to do“
now she knows[/quote]
I don't get the reference.
Really meh episode imo.[/quote]
yeah, insted of the general going „it ate me fleet“ would have been more impressive to have picked it up in a dalek fleet wreackage.
Doctor: „I wonder what destroyed these?“
Pting: „burp“[/quote]
Not sure if you're being sarcastic, but that would have been an improvement imo.[/quote]
that was sarcasm free.[/quote]
[quote="Agi Hammerthief";p="2662780"]
[quote="Thomas Eshuis";p="2662704"]Loved Demons of Punjab though. Rosa should have been more like this.[/quote]
just got around to watch it, totally agree.
Those guys haven’t heared of Testemony I guess.
„It’s not an evil plot, I don’t know what to do“
now she knows[/quote]
I don't get the reference.
"Respect for personal beliefs = "I am going to tell you all what I think of YOU, but don't dare retort and tell what you think of ME because...it's my personal belief". Hmm. A bully's charter and no mistake."
- Agi Hammerthief
- Posts: 3325
- Joined: Feb 25, 2010 7:50 pm
- Country: .de
- Location: .de
Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]
Xmas Special „Twice Upon A Time“
when he discovered that the aliens aren‘t ailiens and not evil.
just collectors of memories.
when he discovered that the aliens aren‘t ailiens and not evil.
just collectors of memories.
* my (modified) emphasis ( or 'interpretation' )
- Thomas Eshuis
- Posts: 31091
- Joined: Jan 30, 2012 5:22 am
- Name: Thomas Eshuis
- Country: Netherlands
Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]
[quote="Agi Hammerthief";p="2662891"]Xmas Special „Twice Upon A Time“
when he discovered that the aliens aren‘t ailiens and not evil.
just collectors of memories.[/quote]
Ah, I see, completely forgot about that point.
when he discovered that the aliens aren‘t ailiens and not evil.
just collectors of memories.[/quote]
Ah, I see, completely forgot about that point.
"Respect for personal beliefs = "I am going to tell you all what I think of YOU, but don't dare retort and tell what you think of ME because...it's my personal belief". Hmm. A bully's charter and no mistake."
- minininja
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: Jul 05, 2013 11:28 pm
Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]
They're really not holding back on violent deaths of innocent and likeable characters this series are they? It's brutal. 
[Disclaimer - if this is comes across like I think I know what I'm talking about, I want to make it clear that I don't. I'm just trying to get my thoughts down]
- Agi Hammerthief
- Posts: 3325
- Joined: Feb 25, 2010 7:50 pm
- Country: .de
- Location: .de
Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]
[quote="minininja";p="2663435"]They're really not holding back on violent deaths of innocent and likeable characters this series are they? It's brutal.
[/quote]
yep, unfortunately unnecessary in this case.
and it was a bit obvious that the System was asking for help.
so obvious they had to lampshade why she didn’t get it.
yep, unfortunately unnecessary in this case.
and it was a bit obvious that the System was asking for help.
so obvious they had to lampshade why she didn’t get it.
* my (modified) emphasis ( or 'interpretation' )
- minininja
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: Jul 05, 2013 11:28 pm
Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]
Just in case anybody needs a copy. 
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
[Disclaimer - if this is comes across like I think I know what I'm talking about, I want to make it clear that I don't. I'm just trying to get my thoughts down]
- Thomas Eshuis
- Posts: 31091
- Joined: Jan 30, 2012 5:22 am
- Name: Thomas Eshuis
- Country: Netherlands
Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]
This week's episode was the least of the bunch so far, imo.
Even the Pting episode manage to keep me entertained.
The king was way to hammy and rather superfluous. And I felt no investment in the monster of this week.
Finally, as several reviews have noted; the dialogue in this episode was repetitive and to expositional.
Even the Pting episode manage to keep me entertained.
The king was way to hammy and rather superfluous. And I felt no investment in the monster of this week.
Finally, as several reviews have noted; the dialogue in this episode was repetitive and to expositional.
"Respect for personal beliefs = "I am going to tell you all what I think of YOU, but don't dare retort and tell what you think of ME because...it's my personal belief". Hmm. A bully's charter and no mistake."
- electricwhiteboy
- Posts: 1331
- Joined: Oct 29, 2010 9:30 am
Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]
[quote="Thomas Eshuis";p="2664514"]
The king was way to hammy and rather superfluous [/quote]
There's a fair chance that was what King James VI was actually like.
The king was way to hammy and rather superfluous [/quote]
There's a fair chance that was what King James VI was actually like.