Pull it together people. It's a piss take. That's a crazy idea for a logo.
Moderators: kiore, Blip, The_Metatron
Nora_Leonard wrote:
Then I don't get the joke.
But what I said still stands, someone without a mathematical or science background isn't going to get it.
Barry Cade wrote:
Whatever, I can see people want an amusing cartoon, or image of some sort, preferably with plenty of messages attached so as to cover all the bases.
Maybe this sort of thing would suit:
I'm bored with this, now. It's starting to resemble every other design-by-committee balls-up I've ever witnessed.
To be honest Mac, I like the interpretation in your current avatar. The RS rat with rationalskepticism.org written below it. RS I think is strong enough in the rat to stand out on it's own (although I could be a bit biased in that I have already seen it used in the ratskep rat. Perhaps someone should ask their better half to see if the RS rat can stand on it's own?).
rEvolutionist wrote:
Ah, now I see where you got your Avatar MacDoc.
Emergence, I think this is a great logo as described above to Mac. What does everyone else think about the strength of the RS in the rat? Does it stand on it's own (with the aid of rationalskepticism.org below it), or are we biased by what we have seen so far?
Nora_Leonard wrote:Whatever we choose as a logo, I'm not sure it's a good idea for it to serve as any individual forum member's avatar?
Emergence wrote:I thought this was more a test to see if it works as avatar, no?
Nora_Leonard wrote:I really like the shiny shield one, i.e. the one on the right. I don't think that it matters if there isn't any symbolism, considering that we can't agree on the symbolism of most things in the first place.
The shield one is definitely 'logo-like', and might make a good starting point for an inspired banner...
Emergence » Jun 09, 2010 8:01 am
I'm not going to make custom avatars on demand. I just thought you might want a version that combines the RatSkep, with RationalSkepticism.
Whatever we choose as a logo, I'm not sure it's a good idea for it to serve as any individual forum member's avatar?
Macdoc wrote:c) has no "fun" embedded"
These are design choices, particularly in a competition they should be left for the most part to the designer. That way we get a wide selection, by limiting these choices we limit the selection.I'd like to see Life indicate what the Logo should contain or whether he just would like eye candy.
Should it have the full URL?
Should it indicate the nature ( fun/serious ) of the forum?
Should it show aspects like "curiousity" as the Rat one does.?
wiki wrote: despite the fact that chocolate is not a fruit[citation needed]
Emergence wrote:Two further Logos using "RS". They both do not provide much in terms of "deeper" symbolism and have no further connection to the community.
wiki wrote: despite the fact that chocolate is not a fruit[citation needed]
Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest