Warning: Will harm IQ

3 in 2 babies are aborted every year! And that's not counting the babies that are pregnant themselves!

Sick delusional bastards.

Planned parenthood = abortion. Bollocks!

Are they not aware that their 'God' aborts more than they can imagine?

Ohh, well lets get rid of them now such a sound argument has come up...

Damn, they've twigged!

Warning: Will harm IQ

35 seconds in and so many brain cells had already died, I no longer possess the motor-neuron capacity to get my finger to click the stop button - it was dicey for a few seconds there, like being stuck in intellectual quicksand.

AAAAAApppllllllllllllll8ujjjjjjjjjjjjjmkjbvcfdwetygrrrrtp

Sums it up, really.

DoctorE wrote:Warning: Will harm IQ

From their own POV, they are correct about the sacrifice part.

From the non-believer POV, except for the satanic garbage, we should also see abortion as a sacrifice of potential human lives because that is what it is.

If the woman would not abort her zygote or fetus, she thinks that she will have to go through more hardship than if she does not abort and thus sacrifices her potential child so that she might not suffer as much.

I am pro choice but still do not like to see potential humans aborted just because we collectively cannot or will not do right or well by them.

Regards
DL

Greatest I am wrote:
I am pro choice but still do not like to see potential humans aborted
because we collectively can not or will not do right or well by them

Society has a say in whether abortion should be legal or not but once it has been legalised then it is a
decision for individual women and no one else. But if you are against abortion why are you pro choice

Greatest I am wrote:If the woman would not abort her zygote or fetus, she thinks that she will have to go through more hardship than if she does not abort and thus sacrifices her potential child so that she might not suffer as much.

Do you think that you've accurately dealt with the reasons that a woman may decide not to have a child? Seems like a very limited perspective, to me, to put it kindly.

Fallible wrote::picard:

The stupid are often speechless when they get confused by logic, reason and a proper way of looking at things that they cannot argue against.

Regards
DL

Oh, I'm not speechless. Just confident that others would have more patience with you. You probably shouldn't call members of the forum stupid though.

surreptitious57 wrote:

Greatest I am wrote:
I am pro choice but still do not like to see potential humans aborted
because we collectively can not or will not do right or well by them

Society has a say in whether abortion should be legal or not but once it has been legalised then it is a
decision for individual women and no one else. But if you are against abortion why are you pro choice

I did not use the word against. I said I did not like it. But you are right that I am against it more than for it.

I am pro-choice because I recognize that the right and responsibility to abort or not is not mine to make.

It is the right of the pregnant woman. It is her body and choice.

Do you like the idea of potential people being aborted?

I know of no one who is pro-abortion but do know many who are pro-choice while disliking the death of potential people..

Regards
DL

Fallible wrote:Oh, I'm not speechless. Just confident that others would have more patience with you. You probably shouldn't call members of the forum stupid though.

Patience with what?

You do not even show what you dislike and are just showing stupidity.

For all I can know, you do not even know how to read my position.

Regards
DL

SkyMutt wrote:

Greatest I am wrote:If the woman would not abort her zygote or fetus, she thinks that she will have to go through more hardship than if she does not abort and thus sacrifices her potential child so that she might not suffer as much.

Do you think that you've accurately dealt with the reasons that a woman may decide not to have a child? Seems like a very limited perspective, to me, to put it kindly.

If the level of hardship is not at issue for the decision to abort, then what is?

We can get more specific but it is still hardship at issue.

I admit that I could have included the hardship of the potential child but thought that understood as it is tied to the hardship of the woman. A child cannot be happy if its mother is not.

Regards
DL

Greatest I am wrote:
Do you like the idea of potential people being aborted

I know of no one who is pro abortion

As long as it is legal I have no strong opinion either way about potential people being aborted

Many members of this forum are pro abortion including me and so you do know some who are

Greatest I am wrote:

SkyMutt wrote:Do you think that you've accurately dealt with the reasons that a woman may decide not to have a child? Seems like a very limited perspective, to me, to put it kindly.

If the level of hardship is not at issue for the decision to abort, then what is?

We can get more specific but it is still hardship at issue.

I admit that I could have included the hardship of the potential child but thought that understood as it is tied to the hardship of the woman. A child cannot be happy if its mother is not.

Regards
DL

The reason I asked is because it seemed to me that your post presented a very shallow level of thinking about this topic. It is not for me to expound on women's motivations when making a decision about whether they will have an abortion or not. Apparently you think you've got it covered, though. Therefore it also appears that my first impression is correct.

Greatest I am wrote:

Fallible wrote:Oh, I'm not speechless. Just confident that others would have more patience with you. You probably shouldn't call members of the forum stupid though.

Patience with what?

You do not even show what you dislike and are just showing stupidity.

For all I can know, you do not even know how to read my position.

Regards
DL

Patience with you, GIA. I know you of old, remember.