More distraction and trolling.

Nevets wrote:

Proto-Greek was originally a dialect of the Proto-Indo-European language. In the late Neolithic https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proto-Greek_language

So it derives from languages that derived from Indo-european.

Your own source expressly states otherwise.

It says that Proto-Greek was a dialect of the Proto-Indo-European language, not another language altogether separate that had evolved from PIE.

Can't read, can you? The simplest explanation is that you just don't understand the topic matter at all, which is why you keep making so many confused errors.

Nevets wrote:
So it derives from languages that derived from Indo-european.

Thomas Eshuis wrote:

Nevets wrote:
So it derives from languages that derived from Indo-european.

Origins

Proto-Greek is mostly placed in the Early Helladic period (late 4th millennium BC; circa 3200 BC) towards the end of the Neolithic in Southern Europe.[5][6] Russell Gray and Quentin Atkinson, in a 2003 paper using computational methods on Swadesh lists, have arrived at a somewhat earlier estimate: around 5000 BC for Graeco-Armenian or proto Graeco-Aryan split, and the emergence of Greek and Armenian as separate linguistic lineages around 4000 BC
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proto-Gre ... ge#Origins

So Graeco came from Graeco Armenian or proto Graeco-Aryan. So lets go to Graeco-Aryan and see what that means

Graeco-Aryan, or Graeco-Armeno-Aryan, is a hypothetical clade within the Indo-European family that would be the ancestor of Greek, Armenian, and the Indo-Iranian languages.

Graeco-Armeno-Aryan group means

The Graeco-Armeno-Aryan group supposedly branched off from the parent Indo-European stem by the mid-3rd millennium BC. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graeco-Aryan

So this means, that Proto Greek, was a language formed, by a language that branched off from its parent group. Which was Indo-european.

People that are arguing against this, are obviously conspiracy theorists, and believe this to be a lie

Spearthrower wrote:

So it derives from languages that derived from Indo-european.

It says that Proto-Greek was a dialect of the Proto-Indo-European language, not another language altogether separate that had evolved from PIE.

Can't read, can you? The simplest explanation is that you just don't understand the topic matter at all, which is why you keep making so many confused errors.

Here is what it says. "again". It branched off from its; "parent" group.

The Graeco-Armeno-Aryan group supposedly branched off from the parent Indo-European stem by the mid-3rd millennium BC.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graeco-Aryan

Aryan, pre-dated Greek

Nevets wrote:

Thomas Eshuis wrote:

Nevets wrote:
So it derives from languages that derived from Indo-european.

Origins

Proto-Greek is mostly placed in the Early Helladic period (late 4th millennium BC; circa 3200 BC) towards the end of the Neolithic in Southern Europe.[5][6] Russell Gray and Quentin Atkinson, in a 2003 paper using computational methods on Swadesh lists, have arrived at a somewhat earlier estimate: around 5000 BC for Graeco-Armenian or proto Graeco-Aryan split, and the emergence of Greek and Armenian as separate linguistic lineages around 4000 BC
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proto-Gre ... ge#Origins

So Graeco came from Graeco Armenian or proto Graeco-Aryan. So lets go to Graeco-Aryan and see what that means

Graeco-Aryan, or Graeco-Armeno-Aryan, is a hypothetical clade within the Indo-European family that would be the ancestor of Greek, Armenian, and the Indo-Iranian languages.

Graeco-Armeno-Aryan group means

The Graeco-Armeno-Aryan group supposedly branched off from the parent Indo-European stem by the mid-3rd millennium BC. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graeco-Aryan

So this means, that Proto Greek, was a language formed, by a language that branched off from its parent group. Which was Indo-european.

People that are arguing against this, are obviously conspiracy theorists, and believe this to be a lie

Nevets wrote:

The Graeco-Armeno-Aryan group supposedly branched off from the parent Indo-European stem by the mid-3rd millennium BC.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graeco-Aryan

Aryan, pre-dated Greek

What's life like under that bridge of yours Nevets?

Thomas Eshuis wrote:

What's life like under that bridge of yours Nevets?

Well why did you bother arguing against contemporary understanding in the first instance.

Nevets wrote:

Thomas Eshuis wrote:

What's life like under that bridge of yours Nevets?

Well why did you bother arguing against contemporary understanding in the first instance.

Did you stop beating your wife yet Nevets?

Nevets wrote:

Thomas Eshuis wrote:

What's life like under that bridge of yours Nevets?

Well why did you bother arguing against contemporary understanding in the first instance.

Your renditions are nothing like a contemporary understanding.

In fact, calling your posts 'understanding' is entirely spurious.