Spearthrower wrote:And there it is: in post-Truth world, we're even supposed to ignore the written, recorded word in favour of a troll's feelies.

Being a contemptible moron is what makes you unwelcome with reasonable people, Cunt - not your fatuous beliefs.

Pudendum wrote:...
Everyone has heard that call...and the framing of it, from both sides.

I mean, unless one is a fucking idiot, who only listens to one side. Plenty of those out there, of course.

THWOTH wrote:

Pudendum wrote:...
Everyone has heard that call...and the framing of it, from both sides.

I mean, unless one is a fucking idiot, who only listens to one side. Plenty of those out there, of course.

Exactly. Apparently one side 'frames' the sitting president's demand that Georgia's secretary of state find an extra eleven and a half thousand votes, that were never cast, as, at best, foolhardy, and at worse, a blatant attempt to fix the ballot and disenfranchise the entire Georgia electorate. The other side 'frames' the sitting president's demand that Georgia's secretary of state find an extra eleven and a half thousand votes, that were never cast, as the heroic act of a true patriot.

So which side of the 'fucking idiot' line to you come down on?

Pudendum wrote: Or were your handlers careful to prevent you knowing?

THWOTH wrote:

Pudendum wrote:...
Everyone has heard that call...and the framing of it, from both sides.

I mean, unless one is a fucking idiot, who only listens to one side. Plenty of those out there, of course.

Exactly. Apparently one side 'frames' the sitting president's demand that Georgia's secretary of state find an extra eleven and a half thousand votes, that were never cast, as, at best, foolhardy, and at worse, a blatant attempt to fix the ballot and disenfranchise the entire Georgia electorate. The other side 'frames' the sitting president's demand that Georgia's secretary of state find an extra eleven and a half thousand votes, that were never cast, as the heroic act of a true patriot.

So which side of the 'fucking idiot' line to you come down on?

Spearthrower wrote:Twitter should be obliged to provide a platform for Muslim terrorists to plan their next attack.

Pudendum apparently can't quite find it in himself to take a position on this.

Now isn't that funny!

It also provokes another relevant question.

Why were you suspended from Rationalia?

Spearthrower wrote:
But whatever other bollocks he wants to sell, the most important bailey to him - the one he really needs to hold to sell the rest of his shit - you can read it right from the outset of this thread - is that disagreement with him means you are as blindly partisan and anti-rational as he is - a manufactured and entirely false parity, no different in mechanism or motivation to the oft-asserted fundamentalist claim that atheism or evolution is a religion. There's a need for you to be brought down to their level so they've got some minor chance of convincing some muppet that there's a genuine controversy.

Pudendum wrote:

Spearthrower wrote:Twitter should be obliged to provide a platform for Muslim terrorists to plan their next attack.

Pudendum apparently can't quite find it in himself to take a position on this.

Now isn't that funny!

It also provokes another relevant question.

Why were you suspended from Rationalia?

He said, ignoring the awkward question of twitters bias.

Again. lol

I know, you are doing the best you can. Refusing to acknowledge the fact of twitters bias must be hard, with no facts available to back it up.

Why not switch to one of your other two troll-themes? This one has you beclowning yourself.

Just saw your Georgia post...right on cue! Is that some quote-mining from his detractors? Or his response, unfiltered by your media thought-leaders? I don't bother with videos, or most of your inane hogwash, to be honest.

Twitter should be obliged to provide a platform for Muslim terrorists to plan their next attack.

drool wrote:unfiltered by your media thought-leaders?

Pudendum wrote:Or were your handlers careful to prevent you knowing?

Can you find his response?

Greg the Grouper wrote:

Pudendum wrote:Or were your handlers careful to prevent you knowing?

Actually, Thwoth is a CIA agent tasked with monitoring your behavior exclusively on this forum.

Greg the Grouper wrote:
I would assume that Trump had some explanation or another. Maybe he said that he just phrased himself really poorly, and that he was definitely asking about something else. I naturally wouldn't expect him to simply admit to having tried to defraud the American people. I think we can all agree that you believe the Democrats did something nefarious this last election cycle; when you decide that they're innocent because they say they are, do let us know.

Spearthrower wrote:What's the First Rule of Leftist club?

Spearthrower wrote:Twitter should be obliged to provide a platform for Muslim terrorists to plan their next attack.

Pudendum apparently can't quite find it in himself to take a position on this.

Now isn't that funny!

It also provokes another relevant question.

Why were you suspended from Rationalia?

Spearthrower wrote:

THWOTH wrote:
So which side of the 'fucking idiot' line to you come down on?

It's almost as if there's... oh what do you call it... evidence? oh yes, evidence of Trump trying to defraud the election, and blow me down, but that evidence seems unable to get past his Morton's Demon.

It's a funny thing to watch - look:




Isn't that perplexing... no, no of course it's not, because we both know exactly how this works - we learned it from watching Creationists!

Someone calling other people 'clown' wrote:Just saw your Georgia post...right on cue! Is that some quote-mining from his detractors? Or his response, unfiltered by your media thought-leaders? I don't bother with videos, or most of your inane hogwash, to be honest.

Seabass wrote:

Spearthrower wrote:Twitter should be obliged to provide a platform for Muslim terrorists to plan their next attack.

Pudendum apparently can't quite find it in himself to take a position on this.

Now isn't that funny!

It also provokes another relevant question.

Why were you suspended from Rationalia?

I asked him on Rationalia if Twitter should be obliged to host snuff films. He wouldn't answer that either, of course, because he's not interested honest debate, he's only interested in trolling.

There's no point in engaging with him.

Twitter should be obliged to provide a platform for Muslim terrorists to plan their next attack.