Proof of a conspiracy?

notquitesane · #1 by **notquitesane** » Jan 05, 2012 10:28 pm

Baroness Philippine Mathilde Camille de Rothschild Wearing Satanic Neck Pieces

http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/ ... othschild/

Bribase · #2 by **Bribase** » Jan 05, 2012 10:35 pm

If they actually are satanic the baroness is just as deluded as the people that think that prayer will protect you from it.

Satan is just as real as god is.

Fallible · #3 by **Fallible** » Jan 05, 2012 10:47 pm

When I first saw the pictures that you’ll see below, I felt sick to my stomach. It wasn’t a physical sickness but a spiritual sense of such palpable evil that my soul felt ill. Whether you’re Christian or not — especially if you’re not a Christian — please bless yourself with the sign of the cross and say a prayer for God’s protection before you read further. I recommend the powerful Prayer to St. Michael, HERE. Please do it even if you don’t believe — if only just to humor a fruitcake, me.

lol.

Onyx8 · #4 by **Onyx8** » Jan 05, 2012 11:08 pm

Proof of bad taste in jewelry, perhaps. Although, to be fair, she is probably trying to distract the attention from her face.

Wuffy · #5 by **Wuffy** » Jan 06, 2012 7:18 am

I'll give you the devil face is pretty distinct on the first one.

But the rest of it is pretty, well to say the least reaching. Depending about which source of Baphomet you bring it from and the "stylised" horns to me looked like a torc derivative instead of actual horn derivative.

Wuffy · #6 by **Wuffy** » Jan 06, 2012 7:24 am

Actually question.. How does wearing devil symbolism mark them as part of the conspiracy. Because I know a lot of Goth's and they aren't in with the Rothchilds...

Onyx8 · #7 by **Onyx8** » Jan 06, 2012 7:28 am

You just think they aren't...

Spearthrower · #8 by **Spearthrower** » Jan 06, 2012 7:38 am

notquitesane wrote:Baroness Philippine Mathilde Camille de Rothschild Wearing Satanic Neck Pieces

http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/ ... othschild/

Who wants to bet on whether she's into astrological woo and is an aries?

Spearthrower · #9 by **Spearthrower** » Jan 06, 2012 7:39 am

Wuffy wrote:I'll give you the devil face is pretty distinct on the first one.

But the rest of it is pretty, well to say the least reaching. Depending about which source of Baphomet you bring it from and the "stylised" horns to me looked like a torc derivative instead of actual horn derivative.

Send me your picture and I will put your face on it: the wonders of photoshop!

Spearthrower · **#10** by **Spearthrower** » Jan 06, 2012 7:41 am

Fallible wrote:
When I first saw the pictures that you’ll see below, I felt sick to my stomach. It wasn’t a physical sickness but a spiritual sense of such palpable evil that my soul felt ill. Whether you’re Christian or not — especially if you’re not a Christian — please bless yourself with the sign of the cross and say a prayer for God’s protection before you read further. I recommend the powerful Prayer to St. Michael, HERE. Please do it even if you don’t believe — if only just to humor a fruitcake, me.

lol.

It's incredible the level of delusion under which people still manage to operate in the real world. This can only be considered a disability.

chairman bill · **#11** by **chairman bill** » Jan 06, 2012 8:25 am

Spearthrower wrote:
Fallible wrote:
When I first saw the pictures that you’ll see below, I felt sick to my stomach. It wasn’t a physical sickness but a spiritual sense of such palpable evil that my soul felt ill. Whether you’re Christian or not — especially if you’re not a Christian — please bless yourself with the sign of the cross and say a prayer for God’s protection before you read further. I recommend the powerful Prayer to St. Michael, HERE. Please do it even if you don’t believe — if only just to humor a fruitcake, me.

lol.

It's incredible the level of delusion under which people still manage to operate in the real world. This can only be considered a disability.

Certainly delusional. Her soul felt ill? What bollocks. It really is execrable nonsense, but these people manage to survive in the real world, despite their clear detachment from reality.

quisquose · **#12** by **quisquose** » Jan 06, 2012 9:09 am

Spearthrower wrote:Who wants to bet on whether she's into astrological woo and is an aries?

If she's an Aries then she almost certainly believes in astrological woo. I'm a Capricorn which makes me sceptical of such nonsense.

Onyx8 · **#13** by **Onyx8** » Jan 06, 2012 10:56 am

Spearthrower wrote:
notquitesane wrote:Baroness Philippine Mathilde Camille de Rothschild Wearing Satanic Neck Pieces

http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/ ... othschild/

Who wants to bet on whether she's into astrological woo and is an aries?

I give you 1:12 odds for Aries.

Fallible · **#14** by **Fallible** » Jan 06, 2012 10:58 am

quisquose wrote:
Spearthrower wrote:Who wants to bet on whether she's into astrological woo and is an aries?

If she's an Aries then she almost certainly believes in astrological woo. I'm a Capricorn which makes me sceptical of such nonsense.

Emergence · **#15** by **Emergence** » Jan 07, 2012 11:07 am

Onyx8 wrote:
Spearthrower wrote:
notquitesane wrote:Baroness Philippine Mathilde Camille de Rothschild Wearing Satanic Neck Pieces

http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/ ... othschild/

Who wants to bet on whether she's into astrological woo and is an aries?

I give you 1:12 odds for Aries.

Well, i would not bet on that. Her wine estate carries the name "Château Mouton Rothschild" and "mouton" is French for 'mutton.'

[Reveal] Spoiler: But, but, but isn't mutton a symbol of ...

Before any conspiracy-nut gets an "Aha!The Rothschilds use the mutton as symbol of Baphometh!!-" Moment from it: "Mouton" was for who-knows-what-reason already part of the name before Nathaniel Rothschild bought the estate in 1853 and renamed it from "Château Brane Mouton" in "Château Mouton Rothschild."

tolman · **#16** by **tolman** » Jan 07, 2012 4:07 pm

Onyx8 wrote:
Spearthrower wrote:
Who wants to bet on whether she's into astrological woo and is an aries?

I give you 1:12 odds for Aries.

Or I guess we could just look up her date of birth on Wikipedia.

lordshipmayhem · **#17** by **lordshipmayhem** » Jan 07, 2012 8:15 pm

tolman wrote:
Onyx8 wrote:
Spearthrower wrote:
Who wants to bet on whether she's into astrological woo and is an aries?

I give you 1:12 odds for Aries.

Or I guess we could just look up her date of birth on Wikipedia.

Per Wikipedia: born Paris, France, 22 November 1933

That makes her a water rooster. :thumbup:

Onyx8 · **#18** by **Onyx8** » Jan 08, 2012 12:26 am

The odds of her being an aries just decreased.

proudfootz · **#19** by **proudfootz** » Jan 08, 2012 2:52 am

Onyx8 wrote:The odds of her being an aries just decreased.

I'm guessing they might have published a false DOB to throw us off the trail...

Onyx8 · **#20** by **Onyx8** » Jan 08, 2012 7:15 am

Sneaking back up...

Proof of a conspiracy?

Proof of a conspiracy?

Re: Proof of a conspiracy?

Re: Proof of a conspiracy?

Re: Proof of a conspiracy?

Re: Proof of a conspiracy?

Re: Proof of a conspiracy?

Re: Proof of a conspiracy?

Re: Proof of a conspiracy?

Re: Proof of a conspiracy?

Re: Proof of a conspiracy?

Re: Proof of a conspiracy?

Re: Proof of a conspiracy?

Re: Proof of a conspiracy?

Re: Proof of a conspiracy?

Re: Proof of a conspiracy?

Re: Proof of a conspiracy?

Re: Proof of a conspiracy?

Re: Proof of a conspiracy?

Re: Proof of a conspiracy?

Re: Proof of a conspiracy?

Who is online