Climate Science In Denial
Global warming alarmists have been discredited, but you wouldn't know it from the rhetoric this Earth Day.
By RICHARD S. LINDZEN
In mid-November of 2009 there appeared a file on the Internet containing thousands of emails and other documents from the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia in Great Britain. How this file got into the public domain is still uncertain, but the emails, whose authenticity is no longer in question, provided a view into the world of climate research that was revealing and even startling.
In what has come to be known as "climategate," one could see unambiguous evidence of the unethical suppression of information and opposing viewpoints, and even data manipulation. The Climatic Research Unit is hardly an obscure outpost; it supplies many of the authors for the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Moreover, the emails showed ample collusion with other prominent researchers in the United States and elsewhere.
One might have thought the revelations would discredit the allegedly settled science underlying currently proposed global warming policy, and, indeed, the revelations may have played some role in the failure of last December's Copenhagen climate conference to agree on new carbon emissions limits. But with the political momentum behind policy proposals and billions in research funding at stake, the impact of the emails appears to have been small.[...]
Source: http://online.wsj.com/article/NA_WSJ_PU ... 62416.html
Also this short clip discussing global warming with Bill Nye:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=McsZ1U20W0M[/youtube]
Richard Lindzen: There is no study that suggests that 2 degrees Fahrenheit will make the world appreciably more dangerous.
He believes that scientists and the media use scare tactics with regard to AGM based on wrongly interpreted data.
Thoughts?