Dentistry.

The accumulation of small heritable changes within populations over time.

Moderators: kiore, Blip, The_Metatron

Re: Dentistry.

#21  Postby OHSU » Jun 21, 2010 3:16 pm

Hopeful Monster wrote:I recently opted not to get my wisdom teeth removed. We will see if I get selected out.


40 years ago, we told everyone they needed to have them removed. Now we have 40 years of statistics to look back on, and what we've discovered is that removing wisdom teeth results in a small statistical chance of a clinical boo-boo, a negative consequence of some sort, like an injured lingual nerve, an infection, or some such thing.

In the case of asymptomatic vertically impacted wisdom teeth, or fully erupted wisdom teeth, the statistical likelihood of a negative consequence from surgery is slightly greater than the likelihood of a natural pathosis developing. In other words, in some cases you're taking less of a risk (slightly) by leaving them alone than by having them removed.

Of course, there are plenty of presentations (many instances of horizontally impacted teeth, any tooth associated with a radiolucency) where you're far more likely to have a problem if you leave them in.
User avatar
OHSU
 
Posts: 399

Print view this post

Re: Dentistry.

#22  Postby Steviepinhead » Jun 22, 2010 5:43 pm

OHSU may enjoy this discussion at the Laelaps blog (hat tip to SteveF at TalkRat):
http://scienceblogs.com/laelaps/2010/06/it_is_all_to_easy.php

As the authors state, their results resolve what otherwise might seem like inconsistencies between what our teeth can handle and our gracile jaw musculature. We might not have the heavy jaws and massive muscles of Paranthropus, but we are more efficient biters, allowing us to exert high bite forces with a different anatomical arrangement. The lineage of hominins of which we are a part did not slowly lose their ability to bite hard as had previously been supposed, but, interestingly, our jaws are not well-suited to sustaining high bite forces for a long time. In other words, our jaws are capable of cracking open something like a nut or hard fruit which requires brief exertion of high bite forces, but they are not well-adapted to doing something like chewing on tough plant food for a long period of time. This raises some interesting questions about the inferred diets of extinct humans, and by utilizing similar modeling techniques paleontologists may be able to determine whether hominins were adapted to deliver short, strong bites, were chewing hard foods which took a longer amount of time to process, or were doing something different.

The research under discussion: Wroe, S., Ferrara, T., McHenry, C., Curnoe, D., & Chamoli, U. (2010). The craniomandibular mechanics of being human Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.0509
Steviepinhead
 
Posts: 326

Print view this post

Re: Dentistry.

#23  Postby OHSU » Jun 22, 2010 9:56 pm

Fascinating. Thank you.
User avatar
OHSU
 
Posts: 399

Print view this post

Previous

Return to Evolution & Natural Selection

Who is online

Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest

cron