"Analyze this!": "You are what you eat."

Skinny Puppy · **#61** by **Skinny Puppy** » Dec 28, 2018 10:02 pm

OlivierK wrote:
Skinny Puppy wrote:
Rachel Bronwyn wrote:Note him selectively going after politicians who happen to be women uh-gain.

I think Skinny's alluding here to the idea that if he covers his eyes, then you won't be able to see his problem with women.

Did you pull that shit out of your arse? Pathetic!

The_Piper · **#62** by **The_Piper** » Dec 28, 2018 10:05 pm

Ironclad · **#63** by **Ironclad** » Dec 29, 2018 1:42 am

Leave Pups alone, you tits

Rachel Bronwyn · **#64** by **Rachel Bronwyn** » Dec 29, 2018 2:31 am

I'm sure he's trying his very best to look clever.

Scot Dutchy · **#65** by **Scot Dutchy** » Dec 29, 2018 6:00 am

Skinny Puppy wrote:
Rachel Bronwyn wrote:It isn't working. His misogyny is too outrageous.

You know, repeating BS ad nauseam doesn’t/won’t/can’t make it true.

Why do you do it then? :naughty:

Skinny Puppy · **#66** by **Skinny Puppy** » Dec 29, 2018 6:55 am

Scot Dutchy wrote:
Skinny Puppy wrote:
Rachel Bronwyn wrote:It isn't working. His misogyny is too outrageous.

You know, repeating BS ad nauseam doesn’t/won’t/can’t make it true.

Why do you do it then?

The_Piper · **#67** by **The_Piper** » Dec 29, 2018 11:31 am

I'll say it again. " :lol:

"

Rachel Bronwyn · **#68** by **Rachel Bronwyn** » Dec 29, 2018 1:15 pm

Scot Dutchy wrote:
Skinny Puppy wrote:
Rachel Bronwyn wrote:It isn't working. His misogyny is too outrageous.

You know, repeating BS ad nauseam doesn’t/won’t/can’t make it true.

Why do you do it then?

Because he's an outrageous misogynist. It's why he likes Trump so much.

The issue is SP is so profoundly lacking in self-awareness he can't see the constant stream of misogynous dreck that is his posting habit here.

This is what happens when you tell your kids they're terribly special and beyond reproach, folks. They grow up to be SP.

Like, seriously, attempts at dismissive humour when people point out that he's posted something misogynous yet again are as honest as people like SP will ever be with themself. We can see his consistently poor treatment of women. It's in his posts. He just sticks his fingers in his ears and pretends everyone else is making it up though. God forbid a white man practice any degree of introspection and assess their own conduct when it's criticised. Just insist everyone else is making it up DESPITE THE FACT THE CONSTANT ABUSE OF WOMEN IS RIGHT THERE FOR ALL OF US TO SEE.

The attitude displayed consistently by SP on this forum is why women are still assaulted and murdered by their intimate partners at absurd rates. "You have a crap attitude towards women." "Shut up, that's not true. resumes abusing women" It's typical wife beater conduct.

Skinny Puppy · **#69** by **Skinny Puppy** » Dec 29, 2018 1:39 pm

Rachel Bronwyn wrote:
Scot Dutchy wrote:
Skinny Puppy wrote:
Rachel Bronwyn wrote:It isn't working. His misogyny is too outrageous.

You know, repeating BS ad nauseam doesn’t/won’t/can’t make it true.

Why do you do it then?

Because he's an outrageous misogynist. It's why he likes Trump so much.

The issue is SP is so profoundly lacking in self-awareness he can't see the constant stream of misogynous dreck that is his posting habit here.

This is what happens when you tell your kids they're terribly special and beyond reproach, folks. They grow up to be SP.

Like, seriously, attempts at dismissive humour when people point out that he's posted something misogynous yet again are as honest as people like SP will ever be with themself. We can see his consistently poor treatment of women. It's in his posts. He just sticks his fingers in his ears and pretends everyone else is making it up though. God forbid a white man practice any degree of introspection and assess their own conduct when it's criticised. Just insist everyone else is making it up DESPITE THE FACT THE CONSTANT ABUSE OF WOMEN IS RIGHT THERE FOR ALL OF US TO SEE.

The attitude displayed consistently by SP on this forum is why women are still assaulted and murdered by their intimate partners at absurd rates. "You have a crap attitude towards women." "Shut up, that's not true. resumes abusing women" It's typical wife beater conduct.

Fallible · **#70** by **Fallible** » Dec 29, 2018 2:05 pm

Skinny Puppy wrote:
Fallible wrote:Ah christ, he's trying humour again. See youse later folks.

Well, would you be willing to teach me humour? You obviously have the gift.

But not childish humour, I’d like to learn the sophisticated, adult and mature humour that you employ.

Fallible wrote:
SevenZarkSeven wrote:
Fallible wrote:Another reason to avoid you.

You can do that by just avoiding me. No need to announce it.

You're a pee pee head.

I'm trying very hard not to say what I think about you regarding this spacktacular fail, but it's tough. I won't labour the point, I'll just say it's physically impossible for you to have not understood something to a greater degree than you have here. Please, please reconsider your choice of ploughing on with trying to be humorously clever.

Fallible · **#71** by **Fallible** » Dec 29, 2018 2:08 pm

Ironclad wrote:Leave Pups alone, you tits

Yeah! We only rip into people you don't like here.

Skinny Puppy · **#72** by **Skinny Puppy** » Dec 29, 2018 2:21 pm

Fallible wrote:
Skinny Puppy wrote:
Fallible wrote:Ah christ, he's trying humour again. See youse later folks.

Well, would you be willing to teach me humour? You obviously have the gift.

But not childish humour, I’d like to learn the sophisticated, adult and mature humour that you employ.

Fallible wrote:
SevenZarkSeven wrote:

You can do that by just avoiding me. No need to announce it.

You're a pee pee head.

I'm trying very hard not to say what I think about you regarding this spacktacular fail, but it's tough. I won't labour the point, I'll just say it's physically impossible for you to have not understood something to a greater degree than you have here. Please, please reconsider your choice of ploughing on with trying to be humorously clever.

Whether you realize it or not, I simply don’t care if you like what I post or not. You’ve stated (10s of times) that you don’t like any humour that I post. That’s fine and that’s your prerogative. However, it’s my prerogative to post as I please as long as I remain within the FUA.

I’m not here to garner your approval, and in fact, it’s the last thing that I’d want since we obviously don’t see eye-to-eye.

Fallible · **#73** by **Fallible** » Dec 29, 2018 2:31 pm

I didn't say I don't like any humour you post. I've commented many times that you're not funny full-stop. In a very real sense you don't post humour. You post a 12-year-old's idea of what grown-ups say when they are trying to be funny or clever, with none of the awareness or intellect that most grown-ups possess. I'm not well, I don't have the energy I used to, so it suits me to reply in the shortest and least in-depth way I know how. You're very easy to mock, because you are so completely inept. That is the humorous side of you. I don't tend to comment on the more disturbing of your posts concerning women and politics, because there's just too much there and I often don't have the energy. Make no mistake though, I find your views repugnant. The only power your posts possess is to bring me into total agreement with Rachel. Someone once told you you were a special little flower. They lied.

Ironclad · **#74** by **Ironclad** » Dec 29, 2018 3:34 pm

Someone got a new pair of teef for Crimble

Rachel Bronwyn · **#75** by **Rachel Bronwyn** » Dec 29, 2018 3:40 pm

Did you eat them?

Rachel Bronwyn · **#76** by **Rachel Bronwyn** » Dec 29, 2018 3:53 pm

I'm not in favour of psychologically crippling one's children so they end up like me. I have zero self-worth. It's really hard for me to accomplish pretty basic things due to my complete lack of self-confidence. It sucks. My parents did us no favours by raising my sister and I to know everything we think and feel is stupid and wrong.

There's a middleground between total insecurity in one's self and believing you're the perfect little boy mommy told you you were growing up.

laklak · **#77** by **laklak** » Dec 29, 2018 5:27 pm

Yeah, it's a bit of a tightrope. They need self-confidence, but also a grounding in reality. Not everybody can be President.

The_Piper · **#78** by **The_Piper** » Dec 29, 2018 5:46 pm

Parenting is hard. I hope I never have to grow up. :dopey:

This reminded me of one of my favorite Seinfeld memes.

SafeAsMilk · **#79** by **SafeAsMilk** » Dec 29, 2018 6:18 pm

laklak wrote:Yeah, it's a bit of a tightrope. They need self-confidence, but also a grounding in reality. Not everybody can be President.

Well they can apparently, but they probably shouldn't.

Cito di Pense · **#80** by **Cito di Pense** » Dec 29, 2018 8:08 pm

laklak wrote:Not everybody can be President.

What would it take for everybody to be president? Let's assume that we select a new president every ten minutes. How many presidents could we have in a generous estimate of an average American's lifetime?

Answer: about 4 million.

So, what are the odds that this American would get to be President during his (or her) lifetime, assuming presidents are chosen at random?

How many Americans are there? More than 4 million.

Analyze that! Want to be president? Eat the president!

"Analyze this!": "You are what you eat."

Re: "Analyze this!": "You are what you eat."

Re: "Analyze this!": "You are what you eat."

Re: "Analyze this!": "You are what you eat."

Re: "Analyze this!": "You are what you eat."

Re: "Analyze this!": "You are what you eat."

Re: "Analyze this!": "You are what you eat."

Re: "Analyze this!": "You are what you eat."

Re: "Analyze this!": "You are what you eat."

Re: "Analyze this!": "You are what you eat."

Re: "Analyze this!": "You are what you eat."

Re:

Re: "Analyze this!": "You are what you eat."

Re: "Analyze this!": "You are what you eat."

Re: "Analyze this!": "You are what you eat."

Re: "Analyze this!": "You are what you eat."

Re: "Analyze this!": "You are what you eat."

Re: "Analyze this!": "You are what you eat."

Re: "Analyze this!": "You are what you eat."

Re: "Analyze this!": "You are what you eat."

Re: "Analyze this!": "You are what you eat."

Who is online