I thought scientists are meant to be skeptical?

I read this article from Forbes which complains that people are skeptical of science findings

Anything that doesn't fit anywhere else below.

Moderators: kiore, Blip, The_Metatron

I thought scientists are meant to be skeptical?

#1  Postby cherubfish » Nov 25, 2018 9:48 am

I read the article here.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/kevinander ... ce5dd64b21

Although I'm not American, this article caught my attention.

It started with this
Scientific news is a subject of growing concern in the United States. It seems like every scientific finding or report is met with disbelief, skepticism, and the anger people that just don’t want to believe in facts. What has happened in America that has put science at an all-time low? Are we headed for a society where opinion matters more than fact, or are Americans just not getting the information they need?


Although the article discusses other issues that are important, the bit about skepticism bugs me.

Why do they consider skepticism towards science findings/ reports to be ... unscientific?

The article complains that every scientific finding or report is met with skepticism, as if skepticism is supposed to be bad?

But as scientists, aren't we meant to be skeptical?
I think skepticism is very important for scientists.
I remember that many many years ago, when I first enrolled in my biology degree, my professor gave us a lecture about the importance of skepticism-- without skepticism, how do we find new things? How does science move forwards?
Science is volatile.
cherubfish
THREAD STARTER
 
Name: Susanna
Posts: 84

Country: Hong Kong
Hong Kong (hk)
Print view this post

Re: I thought scientists are meant to be skeptical?

#2  Postby LucidFlight » Nov 25, 2018 10:13 am

Could be the crappy modern standards of journalism to blame. Hey, let's regurgitate this article and not check the facts ourselves. Moar clicks. Win!
OFFICIAL MEMBER: QUANTUM CONSTRUCTOR CONSCIOUSNESS QUALIA KOALA COLLECTIVE.
User avatar
LucidFlight
RS Donator
 
Name: Kento
Posts: 10805
Male

Country: UK/US/AU/SG
United Kingdom (uk)
Print view this post

Re: I thought scientists are meant to be skeptical?

#3  Postby surreptitious57 » Nov 25, 2018 10:17 am


Skepticism is fine as long as there is no ideological basis for it such as when scientific facts conflict with a belief system
A MIND IS LIKE A PARACHUTE : IT DOES NOT WORK UNLESS IT IS OPEN
surreptitious57
 
Posts: 10203

Print view this post

Re: I thought scientists are meant to be skeptical?

#4  Postby Fenrir » Nov 25, 2018 10:17 am

Scepticism is one thing.

Blind dismissal along ideological or simply anti-intellectual lines is another.

Purveyors of the second often pay lip-service to the first.

I'd have to see what is being referred to here as "scepticism" before I could comment.
Religion: it only fails when you test it.-Thunderf00t.
User avatar
Fenrir
 
Posts: 4109
Male

Country: Australia
South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands (gs)
Print view this post

Re: I thought scientists are meant to be skeptical?

#5  Postby Cito di Pense » Nov 25, 2018 10:37 am

cherubfish wrote:Although the article discusses other issues that are important, the bit about skepticism bugs me.

Why do they consider skepticism towards science findings/ reports to be ... unscientific?


You can easily tell how well skepticism is grounded by how many and which findings are not being treated skeptically. A lot of skepticism we find in the general public is based on almost total ignorance of scientific theories and results. I work that out as a resentment of science based in the skeptic's personal recognition of ignorance.

I said "you can easily tell" but that depends on the knowledge you bring to bear on the skeptic's position.
Хлопнут без некролога. -- Серге́й Па́влович Королёв

Translation by Elbert Hubbard: Do not take life too seriously. You're not going to get out of it alive.
User avatar
Cito di Pense
 
Name: Amir Bagatelle
Posts: 30801
Age: 24
Male

Country: Nutbush City Limits
Ukraine (ua)
Print view this post

Re: I thought scientists are meant to be skeptical?

#6  Postby cherubfish » Nov 25, 2018 11:11 am

I think I understand now.
I think they mean stuff like anti-vax in the article, instead of scientists disagreeing with each other.

Thank you for all the answers!!
cherubfish
THREAD STARTER
 
Name: Susanna
Posts: 84

Country: Hong Kong
Hong Kong (hk)
Print view this post


Return to General Science & Technology

Who is online

Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest

cron