Pentagon researches 'more mobile' hi-tech tank

Anything that doesn't fit anywhere else below.

Moderators: kiore, Blip, The_Metatron

Pentagon researches 'more mobile' hi-tech tank

#1  Postby DougC » Aug 19, 2014 1:49 pm

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-28851359
B.B.C. Article
The research arm of the US military is looking at designs for new hi-tech tanks, focusing less on armour and more on mobility and speed.
The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (Darpa) says it wants to "revolutionise" tank design.
The body says advancements in weaponry in recent years have made heavily armoured tanks less effective.
The next generation of tanks will instead be better able to avoid attacks in the first place.
"It's about breaking the 'more armour' paradigm and revolutionising protection for all armoured fighting vehicles," said Kevin Massey, Darpa program manager.

(Continues)
To do, is to be (Socrate)
To be, is to do (Sartre)
Do be do be do (Sinatra)
SUBWAY(1985)
DougC
THREAD STARTER
 
Posts: 14920
Age: 51
Male

Country: UNITED Kingdom
United Kingdom (uk)
Print view this post

Re: Pentagon researches 'more mobile' hi-tech tank

#2  Postby Mazille » Aug 19, 2014 1:58 pm

Please make a NOD stealth tank, please make a NOD stealth tank, please make a NOD stealth tank, please make a NOD stealth tank, please make a NOD stealth tank, please make a NOD stealth tank, please make a NOD stealth tank, please make a NOD stealth tank, please make a NOD stealth tank, please make a NOD stealth tank... :pray:
- Pam.
- Yes?
- Get off the Pope.
User avatar
Mazille
RS Donator
 
Posts: 19741
Age: 38
Male

Austria (at)
Print view this post

Re: Pentagon researches 'more mobile' hi-tech tank

#3  Postby Briton » Aug 19, 2014 2:20 pm

I bet the police departments can't wait to get their hands on them.
User avatar
Briton
 
Posts: 4024

Country: UK
European Union (eur)
Print view this post

Re: Pentagon researches 'more mobile' hi-tech tank

#4  Postby DougC » Aug 19, 2014 2:28 pm

'YOU HAVE 20 SECONDS TO COMPLY'
To do, is to be (Socrate)
To be, is to do (Sartre)
Do be do be do (Sinatra)
SUBWAY(1985)
DougC
THREAD STARTER
 
Posts: 14920
Age: 51
Male

Country: UNITED Kingdom
United Kingdom (uk)
Print view this post

Re: Pentagon researches 'more mobile' hi-tech tank

#5  Postby Calilasseia » Aug 19, 2014 11:45 pm

You mean something like this?

Signature temporarily on hold until I can find a reliable image host ...
User avatar
Calilasseia
RS Donator
 
Posts: 22634
Age: 62
Male

Country: England
United Kingdom (uk)
Print view this post

Re: Pentagon researches 'more mobile' hi-tech tank

#6  Postby Meme » Aug 20, 2014 12:11 am

The US Army has been wanting to do this with tanks since the mid 1990s.

Unfortunately, every attempt so far to put 70 tons worth of armour protection into a 40, 50 or 60 ton design has turned out to be expensive exercises in futility. FCS was an overcomplicated nightmare of a programme that suffered from technological overreach even before it was formally started and should have been stuck with more realistic objectives. Five years on the US Army has learned nothing from spending $15-20 billion and getting nothing bar a few small UAVs for their money.

I'm not dissing the core idea though. There's a lot you can do with tanks/armoured vehicles in the future. Apart from the significant advances being made with materials technology for physical, passive armour, you've got explosive reactive armour, active armour (electromagnetic reactive armour), active defences (soft-kill like Arena or hard-kill like Trophy), signature minimisation and active/passive countermeasures.

Then you've got stuff that reduces the overall size/weight of the vehicle, like ETC cannon (same bang in smaller/lighter package), electric and hybrid engines, autoloaders, remote weapons stations and suchlike.

The day of the 70 ton tank being the best thing on the ground for ground forces isn't over - having witnessed some in person, there are few things as scary as seeing that much mass and that big a cannon rolling towards you at high speed. But, it will be replaced by smaller wheeled/tracked vehicles, manned and unmanned, at some point in my lifetime.

The US procurement system is broke though, and I've got a feeling that this is going to be another of those DARPA thought exercises that produces some lovely technology in 15 years, but does little for anyone right now, apart from the big US defence companies.
Meme
 
Name: Simon
Posts: 63

Country: Australia
Australia (au)
Print view this post


Return to General Science & Technology

Who is online

Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest

cron