should we have them ?
Moderators: kiore, Blip, The_Metatron
Evolving wrote:I agree, very good idea; and as a parallel thing, how about Frequently Given (Wrong) Answers, as I notice that posters often ask how they can counter some (usually creationist) friend's pseudoscientific argument.
Paul G wrote:I think that should be a seperate thread. Cali started something similar I think.
Mr.Samsa wrote:To organise it you'd probably want two threads: one called "Science FAQs" and one called "Science FAQs (Commentary)". In the commentary thread, people can ask questions about things or put forward common questions that need answers, and people can answer them in the thread. Then we could either pick out the best (most comprehensive, but simple and brief enough to be part of a FAQ) or we could have a new "post" for each question where it includes a couple of the better responses.
Good idea though, I like the sound of it.
Paul G wrote:Sticky?
Darkchilde wrote:Well, we could also take some of the contributions from the Science Writing competition and add them to the FAQ. And especially this month's competition is full of good debunking and definitely food for the FAQs.
Should we make this one the commentary thread then?
Return to General Science & Technology
Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest