For anyone who hasn't followed this story, Muslim footballer Papiss Cisse had refused to wear his club's shirt next season, because it was sponsored by payday loan company Wonga, and this conflicted with his religious beliefs. He got widespread support for this stand, less because of a new found religious tolerance, and more because Wonga is one of the few organisations in the UK less trusted than Islam. Although some did point out that last season he had Virgin Money on his shirt, which also lends cash and charges interest, but the extreme rates of Wonga and what is often seen as the preying on the poor and vulnerable meant he had a lot of people supporting him. He even had the player's union backing him up and there was a precedent for footballers with moral objections to wear unbranded shirts in the past. It all seemed to be going so well.
Until
this:
A Newcastle footballer who said the team's sponsor clashed with his Muslim beliefs has been criticised for visiting a casino.
His agent said that he was not a gambler, but a Muslim councillor said Cisse would be letting Muslims down just by visiting a casino.
A spokesperson for Aspers Casino described Cisse as "an occasional visitor" who was "very well behaved and very welcome", but would not confirm whether or not he placed any bets.
Yeah, I'm sure he was just watching the game.
Anyway, I wonder how much support he'd got if he hadn't given religious reasons for his objections.