Should incels become the new 'protected' species?

SevenZarkSeven · **#221** by **SevenZarkSeven** » Jun 04, 2018 9:11 am

Cito di Pense wrote:
SevenZarkSeven wrote:
The average male is a deadbeat?

No, the average male is not a Master of the Universe.

I'm not aware of any male, living or dead who ever was Master of the Universe.

Cito di Pense · **#222** by **Cito di Pense** » Jun 04, 2018 9:13 am

SevenZarkSeven wrote:
Cito di Pense wrote:
SevenZarkSeven wrote:
The average male is a deadbeat?

No, the average male is not a Master of the Universe.

I'm not aware of any male, living or dead who ever was Master of the Universe.

It's a turn-of-phrase for somebody wearing a Rolex™. Regardless, they're not common.

SevenZarkSeven · **#223** by **SevenZarkSeven** » Jun 04, 2018 9:15 am

Cito di Pense wrote:
SevenZarkSeven wrote:
Cito di Pense wrote:
SevenZarkSeven wrote:
The average male is a deadbeat?

No, the average male is not a Master of the Universe.

I'm not aware of any male, living or dead who ever was Master of the Universe.

It's a turn-of-phrase for somebody wearing a Rolex™. Regardless, they're not common.

Rolexes? Or Masters of the Universe?

Sendraks · **#224** by **Sendraks** » Jun 04, 2018 9:15 am

SevenZarkSeven wrote:Er... No. Like this: displaying what has already been accumulated in youth is evidence of what may further be accumulated over time.

Ah, so women see this "bling" and assume that this is an indicator of what they might acquire through partnering up.
Whilst this is plausible, I'd still like to see some research, rather than just read your biases. After all, this is a pretty one-dimensional view of human relationships you're presenting that's being drawn from your anecdotal evidence which, as you should know, isn't worth a damn to anyone here.

SevenZarkSeven · **#225** by **SevenZarkSeven** » Jun 04, 2018 9:17 am

Sendraks wrote:
SevenZarkSeven wrote:Er... No. Like this: displaying what has already been accumulated in youth is evidence of what may further be accumulated over time.

Ah, so women see this "bling" and assume that this is an indicator of what they might acquire through partnering up.
Whilst this is plausible, I'd still like to see some research, rather than just read your biases. After all, this is a pretty one-dimensional view of human relationships you're presenting that's being drawn from your anecdotal evidence which, as you should know, isn't worth a damn to anyone here.

It's worth plenty to me.

Sendraks · **#226** by **Sendraks** » Jun 04, 2018 9:18 am

SevenZarkSeven wrote:It's worth plenty to me.

Personal anecdotal evidence usually does to those wanting to wallow in their confirmation biases.

That it's worth plenty to you =/= being worth plenty to anyone else.

Cito di Pense · **#227** by **Cito di Pense** » Jun 04, 2018 9:18 am

SevenZarkSeven wrote:
Sendraks wrote:
SevenZarkSeven wrote:Er... No. Like this: displaying what has already been accumulated in youth is evidence of what may further be accumulated over time.

Ah, so women see this "bling" and assume that this is an indicator of what they might acquire through partnering up.
Whilst this is plausible, I'd still like to see some research, rather than just read your biases. After all, this is a pretty one-dimensional view of human relationships you're presenting that's being drawn from your anecdotal evidence which, as you should know, isn't worth a damn to anyone here.

It's worth plenty to me.

How do you show that? By expressing your opinions?

That's not very effective, because you're, uh, nobody.

SevenZarkSeven · **#228** by **SevenZarkSeven** » Jun 04, 2018 10:06 am

Cito di Pense wrote:
SevenZarkSeven wrote:
Sendraks wrote:
SevenZarkSeven wrote:Er... No. Like this: displaying what has already been accumulated in youth is evidence of what may further be accumulated over time.

Ah, so women see this "bling" and assume that this is an indicator of what they might acquire through partnering up.
Whilst this is plausible, I'd still like to see some research, rather than just read your biases. After all, this is a pretty one-dimensional view of human relationships you're presenting that's being drawn from your anecdotal evidence which, as you should know, isn't worth a damn to anyone here.

It's worth plenty to me.

How do you show that? By expressing your opinions?

That's not very effective, because you're, uh, nobody.

I'm a nobody? Well fine then. My dad's bigger than your dad.

Sendraks · **#229** by **Sendraks** » Jun 04, 2018 10:22 am

SevenZarkSeven wrote:My dad's bigger than your dad.

Ah, so you do understand then. Your dad being bigger than anyone else's dad is a complete irrelevance that no one should care about. Much like your anecdotes.

Cito di Pense · **#230** by **Cito di Pense** » Jun 04, 2018 10:24 am

SevenZarkSeven wrote:
Cito di Pense wrote:
SevenZarkSeven wrote:
Sendraks wrote:

Ah, so women see this "bling" and assume that this is an indicator of what they might acquire through partnering up.
Whilst this is plausible, I'd still like to see some research, rather than just read your biases. After all, this is a pretty one-dimensional view of human relationships you're presenting that's being drawn from your anecdotal evidence which, as you should know, isn't worth a damn to anyone here.

It's worth plenty to me.

How do you show that? By expressing your opinions?

That's not very effective, because you're, uh, nobody.

I'm a nobody? Well fine then. My dad's bigger than your dad.

Well, fuck that. I thought it was all about how you had a Rolex.

Fallible · **#231** by **Fallible** » Jun 04, 2018 11:48 am

Where’s Uncertain Sloth when you need him? I want to see him talk about his potential that was on display when he was younger that drew the ladies to him.

UncertainSloth · **#232** by **UncertainSloth** » Jun 04, 2018 11:54 am

Fallible · **#233** by **Fallible** » Jun 04, 2018 12:04 pm

Go on, tell us about the potential to have money and power which you displayed when you were younger, and how it drew the ladies to you.

Mike_L · **#234** by **Mike_L** » Jun 04, 2018 12:06 pm

: wmn_bst.jpg (45.49 KiB) Viewed 799 times

(Kidding)

UncertainSloth · **#235** by **UncertainSloth** » Jun 04, 2018 12:13 pm

Fallible wrote:Go on, tell us about the potential to have money and power which you displayed when you were younger, and how it drew the ladies to you.

UncertainSloth · **#236** by **UncertainSloth** » Jun 04, 2018 12:14 pm

Mike_L wrote:
wmn_bst.jpg

(Kidding)

Fallible · **#237** by **Fallible** » Jun 04, 2018 12:16 pm

Oh, you men!

Mike_L · **#238** by **Mike_L** » Jun 04, 2018 12:22 pm

It also works this way... as a compliment to US...

The Beast's Woman

:grin:

Fallible · **#239** by **Fallible** » Jun 04, 2018 12:23 pm

Shh, he’s holding still while I feminise him.

Mike_L · **#240** by **Mike_L** » Jun 04, 2018 12:26 pm

Should incels become the new 'protected' species?

Re: Should incels become the new 'protected' species?

Re: Should incels become the new 'protected' species?

Re: Should incels become the new 'protected' species?

Re: Should incels become the new 'protected' species?

Re: Should incels become the new 'protected' species?

Re: Should incels become the new 'protected' species?

Re: Should incels become the new 'protected' species?

Re: Should incels become the new 'protected' species?

Re: Should incels become the new 'protected' species?

Re: Should incels become the new 'protected' species?

Re: Should incels become the new 'protected' species?

Re: Should incels become the new 'protected' species?

Re: Should incels become the new 'protected' species?

Re: Should incels become the new 'protected' species?

Re: Should incels become the new 'protected' species?

Re: Should incels become the new 'protected' species?

Re: Should incels become the new 'protected' species?

Re: Should incels become the new 'protected' species?

Re: Should incels become the new 'protected' species?

Re: Should incels become the new 'protected' species?

Who is online