Moderators: kiore, Blip, The_Metatron
ScholasticSpastic wrote:The_Metatron wrote:
How do you know?
Take a wet swab and transfer material from your hands to a petri dish with appropriate media. Do the same with your genitals. Genitals are much, much cleaner than hands in terms of both colony counts and the number of those colony forming units which are pathogenic. Genitals are also usually quite a bit cleaner than hands in terms of basic hygiene. Sure, we wash our hands several times a day and our genitals usually only get washed once, but most of us don't touch as many things with our genitals as with our hands.
ScholasticSpastic wrote:Why should the teachers be so excited about touching children? I hate handshakes. Hands are filthy. You transfer fewer cooties taking a stranger's genitals in your mouth.
ETA: This is only half-true. Mouths are even filthier than hands. So the stranger is getting the bad end of this deal. Cooties-wise, I mean.
tuco wrote:I am thinking person and it is no insult to me not to shake my hand for ANY reason thus you are wrong.
tuco wrote:Speak for yourself.
ScholasticSpastic wrote:I hate handshakes. Hands are filthy. You transfer fewer cooties taking a stranger's genitals in your mouth.
Shrunk wrote:I don't see how this is an insult, anymore than it would be an insult if a Muslim kid refused to eat a pork dinner that someone had prepared.
logical bob wrote:If shaking your hand seems to make a child upset but you use your position of authority to insist they shake it anyway then you may well be behaving like a dick. If you're a teacher in a caring role and you know that one of your students has a father who's an intolerant fundamentalist you should really consider cutting the kid some slack.
However much you might disagree and want to argue with the father/imam and with whatever group of religious adults supported his stand you shouldn't have that argument by proxy by forcing children further between a rock and a hard place than they already are.
I'm reminded of the French schools in areas with National Front controlled local government that, after Charlie Hebdo, stopped offering an alternative to pork in the canteen and made Muslim kids just eat the vegetables. There's really no need to be picking a fight with children.
Shrunk wrote:
I don't see how this is an insult, anymore than it would be an insult if a Muslim kid refused to eat a pork dinner that someone had prepared.
Rumraket wrote:
If the reason they didn't eat a pork dinner you had prepared was that you had touched the pork and thereby corrupted it and made it sinful, then yes it would be insulting. Of course, that's not why they don't eat pork. While the reason is silly (all religions have many silly prohibitions), at least it isn't insulting.
tuco wrote:
There is not enough Picards to award for possibly the dumbest shit I've read here. And make you? Like this? No, thanks for the offer.
Return to News, Politics & Current Affairs
Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest