UK EU Referendum

It's on

For discussion of politics, and what's going on in the world today.

Moderators: kiore, Blip, The_Metatron

Re: UK EU Referendum

#3741  Postby Scot Dutchy » Aug 29, 2016 10:30 am

Image
Myths in islam Women and islam Musilm opinion polls


"Religion is excellent stuff for keeping common people quiet.” — Napoleon Bonaparte
User avatar
Scot Dutchy
 
Posts: 43119
Age: 75
Male

Country: Nederland
European Union (eur)
Print view this post

Re: UK EU Referendum

#3742  Postby Warren Dew » Aug 30, 2016 2:02 pm

mrjonno wrote:
Warren Dew wrote:
ronmcd wrote:
mrjonno wrote:The poor, unemployed and people on zero hour contracts will stay poor and almost certainly wont notice Brexit (unless their benefits are cuts). This is entirely about dragging the middle classes down to their level

I don't know what this means, or if it's a reply to a point, or a random prediction. I don't understand.

He's saying that the reality is that "leave" voters won't be hurt by Brexit ("unless their benefits are cut"), and what they get out of it is a more egalitarian Britain where the more affluent middle class is dragged down toward their level. Basically he's agreeing with you.

Pretty much, the brexit vote was a combination of the worst bits of nationalism (ie we are superior to everyone else) and the nasty side of extreme socialism ,lets give the 'rich' ie the middle classes a good kicking. Warren Dew as a 'conservative' its absolutely nothing to celebrate

I'm just the messenger.

Had I lived in the UK, I would have voted to stay in the EU. However, I also believe that the then PM (see, I've already forgotten his name, Cam something) should have played hardball with the EU when negotiating for concessions, rather than just taking essentially their first offer.

I think the EU is in serious danger of disintegration over the next 5-10 years over issues of nationalism and xenophobia. If the EU is to survive, it needs to back off on federal powers, and return more power to the individual states, at least for the near and medium term.

The bureaucrats in Brussels don't seem to understand this - witness the recent ruling against the tax agreement between Ireland and Apple, which may douse pro-EU sentiment in Ireland considerably - and Merkel's attempts to impose her personal morality regarding refugee immigration on other states isn't helping either. The way things are going, before the Brexit agreements are fully negotiated, there isn't going to be any EU on the other side of the table to negotiate with.

Edit: and again, I'm not saying this is a good thing; I'm just saying that's what the factual situation is.
User avatar
Warren Dew
 
Posts: 5550
Age: 64
Male

Country: Somerville, MA, USA
Print view this post

Re: UK EU Referendum

#3743  Postby Scot Dutchy » Aug 30, 2016 2:20 pm

The EU is nowhere near disintegration. It will be full steam ahead on much tighter association rules. Nothing federal as yet but going that way especially if Britain is out of the way.

Ireland knew it was pulling a fast one and has to accept the consequences. You seem to have this idea that the EU is held together by brown sticky tape and wax which is far from the truth.
Myths in islam Women and islam Musilm opinion polls


"Religion is excellent stuff for keeping common people quiet.” — Napoleon Bonaparte
User avatar
Scot Dutchy
 
Posts: 43119
Age: 75
Male

Country: Nederland
European Union (eur)
Print view this post

Re: UK EU Referendum

#3744  Postby mrjonno » Aug 30, 2016 2:31 pm

I think the EU is in serious danger of disintegration over the next 5-10 years over issues of nationalism and xenophobia. If the EU is to survive, it needs to back off on federal powers, and return more power to the individual states, at least for the near and medium term.


The EU isn't just an economic project its a political one to avoid another European war. Without it I honestly think conflict would be inevitable which doesn't mean that nationalism and xenophobia isn't a problem but within the EU its more manageable. In the end the only way to avoid conflict between nations is to greatly reduce the role of nations.

No one needs to love the EU they just need to want to avoid war more than they dislike the EU
User avatar
mrjonno
 
Posts: 21006
Age: 52
Male

United Kingdom (uk)
Print view this post

Re: UK EU Referendum

#3745  Postby fisherman » Aug 30, 2016 4:00 pm

Can we really point to the EU project as being the prime source of peace in European? I'd be curious to know how much the impact nukes have on war calculations. It's just difficult to envisage that were the project to roll back somewhat, as suggested, that old enemy's would tool up again.

Is it really conceivable that UK, France, Germany et all would face off, bristling with nukes as we are?
User avatar
fisherman
 
Posts: 971

Country: UK
Scotland (ss)
Print view this post

Re: UK EU Referendum

#3746  Postby Scot Dutchy » Aug 30, 2016 4:06 pm

Look most if not all European countries know a union of nations is the only way to protect yourself in the world today. Imagine going back to the days of all the separate currencies constantly the target of speculators on both sides of the pond. Remember the '60's and '70's? It was a mess of ERM and the IMF baling out countries. Greece would have disappeared.

Of course most countries have a love hate relationship with the EU but most realise also it is the only way to survive.
Myths in islam Women and islam Musilm opinion polls


"Religion is excellent stuff for keeping common people quiet.” — Napoleon Bonaparte
User avatar
Scot Dutchy
 
Posts: 43119
Age: 75
Male

Country: Nederland
European Union (eur)
Print view this post

Re: UK EU Referendum

#3747  Postby Scot Dutchy » Aug 30, 2016 4:08 pm

fisherman wrote:Can we really point to the EU project as being the prime source of peace in European? I'd be curious to know how much the impact nukes have on war calculations. It's just difficult to envisage that were the project to roll back somewhat, as suggested, that old enemy's would tool up again.

Is it really conceivable that UK, France, Germany et all would face off, bristling with nukes as we are?


You are unable to perceive of war on say the Ukraine scale?
Myths in islam Women and islam Musilm opinion polls


"Religion is excellent stuff for keeping common people quiet.” — Napoleon Bonaparte
User avatar
Scot Dutchy
 
Posts: 43119
Age: 75
Male

Country: Nederland
European Union (eur)
Print view this post

Re: UK EU Referendum

#3748  Postby Alan B » Aug 30, 2016 4:17 pm

fisherman wrote:Can we really point to the EU project as being the prime source of peace in European? I'd be curious to know how much the impact nukes have on war calculations. It's just difficult to envisage that were the project to roll back somewhat, as suggested, that old enemy's would tool up again.

Is it really conceivable that UK, France, Germany et all would face off, bristling with nukes as we are?

We've had peace for a long time in this part of the world.

You really have no idea. No idea at all.
I have NO BELIEF in the existence of a God or gods. I do not have to offer evidence nor do I have to determine absence of evidence because I do not ASSERT that a God does or does not or gods do or do not exist.
User avatar
Alan B
 
Posts: 9999
Age: 87
Male

Country: UK (Birmingham)
United Kingdom (uk)
Print view this post

Re: UK EU Referendum

#3749  Postby Warren Dew » Aug 30, 2016 4:28 pm

Alan B wrote:
fisherman wrote:Can we really point to the EU project as being the prime source of peace in European? I'd be curious to know how much the impact nukes have on war calculations. It's just difficult to envisage that were the project to roll back somewhat, as suggested, that old enemy's would tool up again.

Is it really conceivable that UK, France, Germany et all would face off, bristling with nukes as we are?

We've had peace for a long time in this part of the world.

You've had NATO, too. It's hard to single out the EU as the critical element.
User avatar
Warren Dew
 
Posts: 5550
Age: 64
Male

Country: Somerville, MA, USA
Print view this post

Re: UK EU Referendum

#3750  Postby fisherman » Aug 30, 2016 4:57 pm

Scot Dutchy wrote:Look most if not all European countries know a union of nations is the only way to protect yourself in the world today. Imagine going back to the days of all the separate currencies constantly the target of speculators on both sides of the pond. Remember the '60's and '70's? It was a mess of ERM and the IMF baling out countries. Greece would have disappeared.

Of course most countries have a love hate relationship with the EU but most realise also it is the only way to survive.

Having trouble posting on phone in airport. Never mind. Discussion started with a suggestion that repatriating powers maybe advisable, which led to suggestion more integration is necessary to prevent conflict in Europe. I'm sceptical, but perhaps.
Re IMF, many countries bailed out since economic crisis, Greece, Ireland, Portugal, Hungary and a few more, this is an improvement?

Although complicated, I see Ukraine as a civil war in nature, not sure that supports the view that less EU would inevitably lead to war in Europe, and when we talk of war in Europe, really it is a world war we talk about.
User avatar
fisherman
 
Posts: 971

Country: UK
Scotland (ss)
Print view this post

Re: UK EU Referendum

#3751  Postby fisherman » Aug 30, 2016 5:10 pm

Alan B wrote:
fisherman wrote:Can we really point to the EU project as being the prime source of peace in European? I'd be curious to know how much the impact nukes have on war calculations. It's just difficult to envisage that were the project to roll back somewhat, as suggested, that old enemy's would tool up again.

Is it really conceivable that UK, France, Germany et all would face off, bristling with nukes as we are?

We've had peace for a long time in this part of the world.

You really have no idea. No idea at all.

Thanks for the education.
I am happy to be completely wrong, I usually am, but I am also interested in testing through discussion what is essentially an assumption, that the EU journey to a super state is necessary to prevent war. My country is about to start disentangling itself from the EU, perhaps then the likelihood of war will increase?
User avatar
fisherman
 
Posts: 971

Country: UK
Scotland (ss)
Print view this post

Re: UK EU Referendum

#3752  Postby GrahamH » Aug 30, 2016 5:25 pm

I see the EU as the embodiment of the principle that you are less likely to attack your friends and trading partners than your military foes. NATO may maintain a balance of power, but it does so by posing a constant threat. NATO expansionism has been identified as a contributory factor in Russian action in Crimea nd that seems rational and credible to me. A response to that has been to conduct military exercises along the borders, which raises tensions further, but may deter action in the short term.

I can't see how UK nukes are any deterrent to action in the region of Uraine.
Why do you think that?
GrahamH
 
Posts: 20419

Print view this post

Re: UK EU Referendum

#3753  Postby Scot Dutchy » Aug 30, 2016 5:29 pm

I for one would like would like to see NATO reduced to a passive role. It is far too aggressive.
Myths in islam Women and islam Musilm opinion polls


"Religion is excellent stuff for keeping common people quiet.” — Napoleon Bonaparte
User avatar
Scot Dutchy
 
Posts: 43119
Age: 75
Male

Country: Nederland
European Union (eur)
Print view this post

Re: UK EU Referendum

#3754  Postby mrjonno » Aug 30, 2016 5:34 pm

NATO was about preventing the USSR invading, and Russia is still a major threat.

The EU was preventing another European civil war which lets face it is what a lot of Brexiters want
User avatar
mrjonno
 
Posts: 21006
Age: 52
Male

United Kingdom (uk)
Print view this post

Re: UK EU Referendum

#3755  Postby Scot Dutchy » Aug 30, 2016 5:37 pm

I dont agree about the cold war etc. It served many masters very well.
Myths in islam Women and islam Musilm opinion polls


"Religion is excellent stuff for keeping common people quiet.” — Napoleon Bonaparte
User avatar
Scot Dutchy
 
Posts: 43119
Age: 75
Male

Country: Nederland
European Union (eur)
Print view this post

Re: UK EU Referendum

#3756  Postby mrjonno » Aug 30, 2016 5:50 pm

Scot Dutchy wrote:I dont agree about the cold war etc. It served many masters very well.


Still terrified of Russia, its weaker than the USSR but NATO has never looked more flakey. Trump said he wouldn't uphold his NATO obligations and there isn't a chance in hell the UK would get involved if Russia invaded the Baltic states (most kippers love Putin)
User avatar
mrjonno
 
Posts: 21006
Age: 52
Male

United Kingdom (uk)
Print view this post

Re: UK EU Referendum

#3757  Postby Thomas Eshuis » Aug 31, 2016 7:13 am

Could not resist:
Image
"Respect for personal beliefs = "I am going to tell you all what I think of YOU, but don't dare retort and tell what you think of ME because...it's my personal belief". Hmm. A bully's charter and no mistake."
User avatar
Thomas Eshuis
 
Name: Thomas Eshuis
Posts: 31091
Age: 34
Male

Country: Netherlands
European Union (eur)
Print view this post

Re: UK EU Referendum

#3758  Postby Scot Dutchy » Aug 31, 2016 7:17 am

:rofl: Mooi Thomas. Sums it up nicely.
Myths in islam Women and islam Musilm opinion polls


"Religion is excellent stuff for keeping common people quiet.” — Napoleon Bonaparte
User avatar
Scot Dutchy
 
Posts: 43119
Age: 75
Male

Country: Nederland
European Union (eur)
Print view this post

Re: UK EU Referendum

#3759  Postby Scot Dutchy » Aug 31, 2016 8:02 am

Brexit divisions emerge as Whitehall draws up leave scenarios

‘Continuum’ of options stretches from liberal access to single market to stringent border controls alongside trade tariffs

Civil servants have been asked to assess the impact of a wide range of Brexit scenarios, from full membership of the European Economic Area (EEA) to a system under which some Europeans would need visas just to holiday in Britain.

Theresa May gathers her cabinet at Chequers on Wednesday with Brexit at the top of the agenda, and the scenarios exercise has already started to expose potential divisions in government.
The scenario planning is taking place across government with reports expected to be fed into the Brexit department run by David Davis. However, the findings are likely to remain internal.

Some officials at the Foreign Office are pushing for “as much Europe as possible” while others in the Home Office are reluctant to consider full EEA membership or single market access because their priority is an immigration clampdown, according one Whitehall source.

They said government departments were thinking of the possible forms that Brexit could take along a “continuum” stretching from heavy access to the single market with limited restrictions on immigration to stringent border controls alongside trade tariffs imposed under WTO rules.
More...


This last is for me the only option they have if they want to stop free movement. No single market that is for sure and the City of London? A third rate trading post?
Myths in islam Women and islam Musilm opinion polls


"Religion is excellent stuff for keeping common people quiet.” — Napoleon Bonaparte
User avatar
Scot Dutchy
 
Posts: 43119
Age: 75
Male

Country: Nederland
European Union (eur)
Print view this post

Re: UK EU Referendum

#3760  Postby mrjonno » Aug 31, 2016 9:04 am

London will still remain an important financial centre outside the EU but it will be a smaller one. There is a lot of talk of moving the back end staff out as they with modern technology can be based anywhere including places with lower wages
User avatar
mrjonno
 
Posts: 21006
Age: 52
Male

United Kingdom (uk)
Print view this post

PreviousNext

Return to News, Politics & Current Affairs

Who is online

Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest