Moderators: kiore, Blip, The_Metatron
Teague wrote:Amazing isn't it? Given 2 candidates that are going against the establishment there's that many small minded, hateful people in NH that they voted for Trump instead of Sanders. NH should be shamed, massively for begin a bunch of cunts or for putting up with a bunch of cunts.
GT2211 wrote: 4)This is really where the challenge begins for Bernie. 538 and Cook collab'd on creating a scorecard based on support in national survey's, demographics such as race, ideology etc... then used that information to model how well each candidate needs to do to win 50% of the delegates. It gives candidates a slight bump in their home state and Bernie decent built in bump in caucus states.
ScholasticSpastic wrote:This makes no sense. It was the primary. They can't vote fore a Republican INSTEAD of the Democrat during a primary because primaries are Republicans running against other Republicans and Democrats running against other Democrats. I agree that Trump's win was indicative of an outsize cunt population, but this has nothing to do with how many people support Sanders there.
Shrunk wrote:GT2211 wrote: 4)This is really where the challenge begins for Bernie. 538 and Cook collab'd on creating a scorecard based on support in national survey's, demographics such as race, ideology etc... then used that information to model how well each candidate needs to do to win 50% of the delegates. It gives candidates a slight bump in their home state and Bernie decent built in bump in caucus states.
OK, they just made that up, right? A dead heat? Come on.
Shrunk wrote:
Although I did hear one CNN report that described undecided independent voters who were flipping between Trump and Sanders. FWIW. If such people actually exist, they should just be shot and put out of their misery.
GT2211 wrote:Some quick takes:
1)The GOP is a hot mess. Just when it seemed Rubio may be the one to get the establishment to rally around him, Christie sinks his campaign and he has a terrible finish in NH. I think Rand dropped out too soon. Will it be Kasich? The return of Jeb!?
2)Carson's out next right? Right?
3) It was a good night for Bern. He at one point had a 20 point aggregate poll advantage in the state, but the tracking polls all showed tightening in the last couple days. I thought going into the night that anything <10% victory would be a disaster, but if he could hit 60+ it would be a good night for Bernie.
4)This is really where the challenge begins for Bernie. 538 and Cook collab'd on creating a scorecard based on support in national survey's, demographics such as race, ideology etc... then used that information to model how well each candidate needs to do to win 50% of the delegates. It gives candidates a slight bump in their home state and Bernie decent built in bump in caucus states.
Pulsar wrote:I just learned that this guy is also a presidential candidate. Seriously.
He's probably less crazy than any republican candidate
ScholasticSpastic wrote::doh: Oooh! Not a good idea to joke about black Americans and nooses.
I know you didn't mean it that way, but there's still a lot of baggage around our history of strange fruit.
ETA: Sort of funny, maybe, in light of the Huffpo headline.....
Shrunk wrote:Although I did hear one CNN report that described undecided independent voters who were flipping between Trump and Sanders. FWIW. If such people actually exist, they should just be shot and put out of their misery.
Teague wrote:Amazing isn't it? Given 2 candidates that are going against the establishment there's that many small minded, hateful people in NH that they voted for Trump instead of Sanders. NH should be shamed, massively for begin a bunch of cunts or for putting up with a bunch of cunts.
CdesignProponentsist wrote:
I think you are being overly sensitive. It was hilarious.
r.c wrote:GT2211 wrote:Some quick takes:
1)The GOP is a hot mess. Just when it seemed Rubio may be the one to get the establishment to rally around him, Christie sinks his campaign and he has a terrible finish in NH. I think Rand dropped out too soon. Will it be Kasich? The return of Jeb!?
2)Carson's out next right? Right?
3) It was a good night for Bern. He at one point had a 20 point aggregate poll advantage in the state, but the tracking polls all showed tightening in the last couple days. I thought going into the night that anything <10% victory would be a disaster, but if he could hit 60+ it would be a good night for Bernie.
4)This is really where the challenge begins for Bernie. 538 and Cook collab'd on creating a scorecard based on support in national survey's, demographics such as race, ideology etc... then used that information to model how well each candidate needs to do to win 50% of the delegates. It gives candidates a slight bump in their home state and Bernie decent built in bump in caucus states.
But doesn't Clinton already have a lead of 400 from the superdelegates?
Shrunk wrote:ScholasticSpastic wrote:This makes no sense. It was the primary. They can't vote fore a Republican INSTEAD of the Democrat during a primary because primaries are Republicans running against other Republicans and Democrats running against other Democrats. I agree that Trump's win was indicative of an outsize cunt population, but this has nothing to do with how many people support Sanders there.
Although I did hear one CNN report that described undecided independent voters who were flipping between Trump and Sanders. FWIW. If such people actually exist, they should just be shot and put out of their misery.
ScholasticSpastic wrote:CdesignProponentsist wrote:
I think you are being overly sensitive. It was hilarious.
Sensitive implies that I was offended. That isn't the case. I was being conscious of the potential to give offense, and aware of the basis for that potential offense. I think it's especially relevant on a forum where I've seen Ben Carson called a race traitor.
Return to News, Politics & Current Affairs
Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest