purplerat wrote:proudfootz wrote:I don't know - I don't follow American Football politics.
Watching what the police did to Brendan Dassey it's difficult to put much faith in the people who cobbled together this case.
The said thing about what happened to Dassey is that it's not a conspiracy at all. It's business as usual for police. They did what they did while they recorded it. Multiple times. And turned it over to the defense as if Dassey just walked in and confessed no questions asked.
I think they really thought he was involved and weren't going to believe anything different so they screwed him over. But that happens everyday and doesn't require a conspiracy. It does however raise questions about how that could happen alongside some grand conspiracy to frame Avery. While I think the average cop would screw over somebody they believed was guilty I find it very hard to believe a cop with no stake in doing so would setup a 16 year old for a crime they know the kid didn't commit, especially when they already have somebody else to pin it on.
I suppose it comes down to what sense the word is used. In the case of Dassey it seems clear that several people worked together to frame him. Two or more people working in concert meets a bare bones definition of 'conspiracy'.
If this
is 'business as usual' it doesn't fit the notion of an
ad hoc plan to frame one person of interest. Not particularly
grand , obviously- just sordid and corrupt. But it does suggest something a great deal worse.
If it is
business as usual, then there is a pattern of behavior which should give us pause when contemplating how law enforcement officers proceed against
other citizens who come under their scrutiny.
It would appear the original direction of the coaching of Dassey was to create 'eyewitness evidence' against Avery. Over time it seems to have morphed into implicating Dassey. I have a hard time believing this happened by
accident, that they 'inadvertently' fed him all the details and sculpted the storyline they would use against him.
As far as 'having a stake' in participating in sordid and corrupt business as usual - it 's not unheard of for members of a corrupt organization to cover for one another's questionable activities.
The actions of these police shows they don't have much by way of scruples when it comes to playing their parts in
business as usual in this department.