Moderators: kiore, Blip, The_Metatron
#41 
by Thommo » Oct 23, 2014 2:48 pm
noahsociety wrote:i think therefore i am
I think therefore it is
i am thought
God is thought
surely not a non sequitur followed by a false syllogism
2=1 3=1 everything =1
#42 by Thommo » Oct 23, 2014 2:56 pm
noahsociety wrote:1=2
1=total sum of all known things
2= 2 halves 1/2 + 1/2 =1 2=1
also 2= 1/2 3= 1/3 50= 1/50
The numbers are not being used in their normal meaning but the fact remains that the maths makes sense.
God exists but not in the way you try to observe or explain
You lot are no different to Qabbalists trying to gauge the speed of the Earths travel on its axis by consulting the Tetragammaton
You use the wong definitions, 8 the wrong logic I guess its because we still havent evolved enough yet in our science
#43 by Spearthrower » Oct 23, 2014 3:30 pm
noahsociety wrote:Quite absurd & ridiculous IPU's exist. they exist in cartoons. they exist in "proof arguments" they exist. Their force is not strong,but they still have a presence and every time you use a jpeg of a ipu its existence strengthens. Observe it for yourselves.
God exists. Gods force is very strong, life and death in fact. God's force propels human action, not all but a lot. When humanity no longer considers God and is no longer propelled by him then God will no longer exist. But the human brain has a program within it . Its the program that makes us consider & strive for perfection. Because of this, thoughts of God and therefore God's force will never die. Biblical ones might and go the way of baal etc but at the very least the concept of a perfect God will always remain in the minds of humanity . So again why would science even try to disprove the existence of God. Better to redesign instead
#44 by scott1328 » Oct 23, 2014 3:35 pm
#45 by Thommo » Oct 23, 2014 3:37 pm
scott1328 wrote:GOD is defined as the set of all intangible, invisible, omnipotent, omniscient, transcendent, eternal beings who care if you masturbate.
Ergo GOD exists.
Interestingly GOD = {}
#46 by Spearthrower » Oct 23, 2014 3:39 pm
noahsociety wrote:1=2
1=total sum of all known things
2= 2 halves 1/2 + 1/2 =1 2=1
also 2= 1/2 3= 1/3 50= 1/50
The numbers are not being used in their normal meaning but the fact remains that the maths makes sense.
God exists but not in the way you try to observe or explain
You lot are no different to Qabbalists trying to gauge the speed of the Earths travel on its axis by consulting the Tetragammaton
You use the wong definitions, 8 the wrong logic I guess its because we still havent evolved enough yet in our science
#47 by Spearthrower » Oct 23, 2014 3:39 pm
#48 by Spearthrower » Oct 23, 2014 3:40 pm
noahsociety wrote:surreptitious57 wrote:noahsociety wrote:
The numbers are not being used in their normal meaning but the fact remains that the maths makes sense
Mathematics is a deductive discipline that uses proof to validate its conclusions. It is the language of reality as all the laws of physics are written as such. But using it to prove the metaphysical is not what it is intended for and is therefore a misuse of its function. If mathematics could determine the existence of God then it would be absolute by default as all its proofs are
Godel?
#49 by noahsociety » Oct 23, 2014 4:44 pm
Spearthrower wrote:noahsociety wrote:surreptitious57 wrote:noahsociety wrote:
The numbers are not being used in their normal meaning but the fact remains that the maths makes sense
Mathematics is a deductive discipline that uses proof to validate its conclusions. It is the language of reality as all the laws of physics are written as such. But using it to prove the metaphysical is not what it is intended for and is therefore a misuse of its function. If mathematics could determine the existence of God then it would be absolute by default as all its proofs are
Godel?
Yodel?
#50 by ScholasticSpastic » Oct 23, 2014 4:50 pm
#52 by Thommo » Oct 23, 2014 5:06 pm
#53 by noahsociety » Oct 23, 2014 5:12 pm
#54 by Thommo » Oct 23, 2014 5:29 pm
#55 by noahsociety » Oct 23, 2014 5:29 pm
#57 by Spearthrower » Oct 23, 2014 5:45 pm
noahsociety wrote:If you remove God from this world and destroy the notion of a perfect God using science (the wrong tool) then you will cause great damage and have been doing so. People need God in their lives If i was a theist and came on here I would doubt my own sanity (and i have heard these same comments being thrown at theists since the days of The Ponderers Guild )
So never try and use a non-metaphysical tool for dismantling God. Luckily the one reason why God will always exist, despite your efforts both consciously and sub-consciously ( your thinking has force among colleagues family friends etc) is that some of us use the right tools and fight to strip away the lies in religion to find the kernel of truth for all especially those that really do need a God. God will never die because our imagination of perfection will never let it be so
#58 by Animavore » Oct 23, 2014 5:48 pm
#59 by noahsociety » Oct 23, 2014 6:14 pm
#60 by Animavore » Oct 23, 2014 6:16 pm
Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest
