SafeAsMilk wrote:Laughing at your posts isn't really a consequence, it's actually one of the primary reasons I read them. I'm expecting more inanities like the post above instead of actually addressing any points made about the OP, as usual.

jamest wrote:I should at least be thanked for dragging various people here out of the social forum for a few days.

jamest wrote:
You know who you are. The shell of humour combined with atheism is a recognisable defense mechanism, so I understand how difficult it is for you all to partake here and face the consequences of talking to me. Respect.

Thomas Eshuis wrote:

jamest wrote:I should at least be thanked for dragging various people here out of the social forum for a few days.

You won't be thanked for fantastical scenarios James.

jamest wrote:
You know who you are. The shell of humour combined with atheism is a recognisable defense mechanism, so I understand how difficult it is for you all to partake here and face the consequences of talking to me. Respect.

Once again nothing but pesonal remarks that fail to hide the failure of adressing the points that have been raised.

jamest wrote:

SafeAsMilk wrote:Laughing at your posts isn't really a consequence, it's actually one of the primary reasons I read them. I'm expecting more inanities like the post above instead of actually addressing any points made about the OP, as usual.

Well, when you decide between laughs and salvation, give me the nod. I mean, I might be the world's best philosopher, but I'm not fucking psychic.

SafeAsMilk wrote:

jamest wrote:

SafeAsMilk wrote:Laughing at your posts isn't really a consequence, it's actually one of the primary reasons I read them. I'm expecting more inanities like the post above instead of actually addressing any points made about the OP, as usual.

Well, when you decide between laughs and salvation, give me the nod. I mean, I might be the world's best philosopher, but I'm not fucking psychic.

Couldn't have proven me more right if you tried.

jamest wrote:

Thomas Eshuis wrote:

jamest wrote:I should at least be thanked for dragging various people here out of the social forum for a few days.

You won't be thanked for fantastical scenarios James.

jamest wrote:
You know who you are. The shell of humour combined with atheism is a recognisable defense mechanism, so I understand how difficult it is for you all to partake here and face the consequences of talking to me. Respect.

Once again nothing but pesonal remarks that fail to hide the failure of adressing the points that have been raised.

Thomas, come to England.

We don't have as many drugs as Holland, but by God I swear that we English will cure you of your demons.

jamest wrote:

SafeAsMilk wrote:

jamest wrote:

SafeAsMilk wrote:Laughing at your posts isn't really a consequence, it's actually one of the primary reasons I read them. I'm expecting more inanities like the post above instead of actually addressing any points made about the OP, as usual.

Well, when you decide between laughs and salvation, give me the nod. I mean, I might be the world's best philosopher, but I'm not fucking psychic.

Couldn't have proven me more right if you tried.

Loving the banter, squire. Be well.

Thomas Eshuis wrote:

jamest wrote:

Thomas Eshuis wrote:

jamest wrote:I should at least be thanked for dragging various people here out of the social forum for a few days.

You won't be thanked for fantastical scenarios James.

jamest wrote:
You know who you are. The shell of humour combined with atheism is a recognisable defense mechanism, so I understand how difficult it is for you all to partake here and face the consequences of talking to me. Respect.

Once again nothing but pesonal remarks that fail to hide the failure of adressing the points that have been raised.

Thomas, come to England.

First of all, QED.
Secondly, I've recently been to both England and Scotland.

We don't have as many drugs as Holland, but by God I swear that we English will cure you of your demons.

Again, I am not in Holland.
Again, I've 0 interest in drugs.
Again, my depression is completely irrelevant, making this nothing but a pathetic attempt to poison the well.

SafeAsMilk wrote:

jamest wrote:

SafeAsMilk wrote:

jamest wrote:
Well, when you decide between laughs and salvation, give me the nod. I mean, I might be the world's best philosopher, but I'm not fucking psychic.

Couldn't have proven me more right if you tried.

Loving the banter, squire. Be well.

Heyo, there it is again. You realize I don't get less right the more you do it, right?

jamest wrote:

SafeAsMilk wrote:

jamest wrote:

SafeAsMilk wrote:
Couldn't have proven me more right if you tried.

Loving the banter, squire. Be well.

Heyo, there it is again. You realize I don't get less right the more you do it, right?

Why are you talking to me when you could be shoving that badger up your arse? Get your priorities sorted, squire.

SafeAsMilk wrote:

jamest wrote:

SafeAsMilk wrote:

jamest wrote:
Loving the banter, squire. Be well.

Heyo, there it is again. You realize I don't get less right the more you do it, right?

Why are you talking to me when you could be shoving that badger up your arse? Get your priorities sorted, squire.

Again, nobody knows why you've chosen an iced animal for your trite invective, and nobody really cares. The only thing it continues to show is that I'm right about your inability to address any points about your abortion of an OP, so maybe get your priorities sorted?

jamest wrote:

SafeAsMilk wrote:

jamest wrote:

SafeAsMilk wrote:
Heyo, there it is again. You realize I don't get less right the more you do it, right?

Why are you talking to me when you could be shoving that badger up your arse? Get your priorities sorted, squire.

Again, nobody knows why you've chosen an iced animal for your trite invective, and nobody really cares. The only thing it continues to show is that I'm right about your inability to address any points about your abortion of an OP, so maybe get your priorities sorted?

I would advise you to lubricate your passgage, as you're beginning to sound a bit anal.

You'll get all the thumbs-ups, of course, but in a field full of horses and one pig, the horses will never transcend themselves except via the pig.

jamest wrote:I should at least be thanked for dragging various people here out of the social forum for a few days. You know who you are. The shell of humour combined with atheism is a recognisable defense mechanism, so I understand how difficult it is for you all to partake here and face the consequences of talking to me. Respect.

jamest wrote:

SafeAsMilk wrote:Laughing at your posts isn't really a consequence, it's actually one of the primary reasons I read them. I'm expecting more inanities like the post above instead of actually addressing any points made about the OP, as usual.

Well, when you decide between laughs and salvation, give me the nod. I mean, I might be the world's best philosopher, but I'm not fucking psychic.

jamest wrote:

Thomas Eshuis wrote:

jamest wrote:I should at least be thanked for dragging various people here out of the social forum for a few days.

You won't be thanked for fantastical scenarios James.

jamest wrote:
You know who you are. The shell of humour combined with atheism is a recognisable defense mechanism, so I understand how difficult it is for you all to partake here and face the consequences of talking to me. Respect.

Once again nothing but pesonal remarks that fail to hide the failure of adressing the points that have been raised.

Thomas, come to England. We don't have as many drugs as Holland, but by God I swear that we English will cure you of your demons.

jamest wrote:

SafeAsMilk wrote:

jamest wrote:

SafeAsMilk wrote:
Heyo, there it is again. You realize I don't get less right the more you do it, right?

Why are you talking to me when you could be shoving that badger up your arse? Get your priorities sorted, squire.

Again, nobody knows why you've chosen an iced animal for your trite invective, and nobody really cares. The only thing it continues to show is that I'm right about your inability to address any points about your abortion of an OP, so maybe get your priorities sorted?

I would advise you to lubricate your passgage, as you're beginning to sound a bit anal. You'll get all the thumbs-ups, of course, but in a field full of horses and one pig, the horses will never transcend themselves except via the pig.

jamest wrote:I've just stumbled upon a thread which held sanity in sway as a means of all sorts of social assessment. I don't wish to discuss the subject of that thread, but it did occur to me strongly that sanity itself cannot be known as a value except by those who know absolutely everything, which excludes virtually all of us. So, perhaps, question your own sanity prior to questioning it of others.

jamest wrote:

Thomas Eshuis wrote:

jamest wrote:

Thomas Eshuis wrote:
You won't be thanked for fantastical scenarios James.


Once again nothing but pesonal remarks that fail to hide the failure of adressing the points that have been raised.

Thomas, come to England.

First of all, QED.
Secondly, I've recently been to both England and Scotland.

We don't have as many drugs as Holland, but by God I swear that we English will cure you of your demons.

Again, I am not in Holland.
Again, I've 0 interest in drugs.
Again, my depression is completely irrelevant, making this nothing but a pathetic attempt to poison the well.

You cannot really come to England unless you immerse yourself in Englishness, Sir.

jamest wrote: Just getting the ferry to Dover doesn't cut the mustard.

jamest wrote: Anyway, I meant what I said in the other thread. I wish you well... and you definitely do need to just have some fun. Forget about thinking. Just feel and do.

Fallible wrote:

jamest wrote:

SafeAsMilk wrote:

jamest wrote:
Why are you talking to me when you could be shoving that badger up your arse? Get your priorities sorted, squire.

Again, nobody knows why you've chosen an iced animal for your trite invective, and nobody really cares. The only thing it continues to show is that I'm right about your inability to address any points about your abortion of an OP, so maybe get your priorities sorted?

I would advise you to lubricate your passgage, as you're beginning to sound a bit anal. You'll get all the thumbs-ups, of course, but in a field full of horses and one pig, the horses will never transcend themselves except via the pig.

James, why are you up at 3 o'clock in the fucking morning typing shite on the internet?

juju7 wrote:

Fallible wrote:

jamest wrote:

SafeAsMilk wrote:
Again, nobody knows why you've chosen an iced animal for your trite invective, and nobody really cares. The only thing it continues to show is that I'm right about your inability to address any points about your abortion of an OP, so maybe get your priorities sorted?

I would advise you to lubricate your passgage, as you're beginning to sound a bit anal. You'll get all the thumbs-ups, of course, but in a field full of horses and one pig, the horses will never transcend themselves except via the pig.

James, why are you up at 3 o'clock in the fucking morning typing shite on the internet?

Why are you talking to yourself. 4 posts in a row, you know that is a sign of stark raving barminess.