Fallible wrote:One, one, one, one,
Come on baby say you love me,
One, one, one time.
One, one, one, one,
I'm just gonna keep on counting,
Till you are mine.
Are you serenading me, or one of the other bozos?
Moderators: kiore, Blip, The_Metatron
Fallible wrote:One, one, one, one,
Come on baby say you love me,
One, one, one time.
One, one, one, one,
I'm just gonna keep on counting,
Till you are mine.
Fallible wrote:That's a false wassname.
Fallible wrote:No, your question was a kind of false dilemma.
One on the Left and One on the Right. Can you tell Left from Right, my dear Coproduct? If so, you can count as high as you like.jamest wrote:I'm bored, so might as well talk bollocks.
First, what is 'two' other than a collection of ones? That is, things only exist as ones, or even as one [collection of ones]. Of course, nothing is a non-existent qualifier and so no thing exists as nothing, and if it does then it is wrong to call it nothing. So spare me the spiel.
So, we have ones. But how many? Numerous or one? Well, let's consider the former. If we have numerous ones then they're all separated by, err, does not compute... they cannot be separated.
jamest wrote:I'm bored, so might as well talk bollocks.
First, what is 'two' other than a collection of ones? That is, things only exist as ones, or even as one [collection of ones]. Of course, nothing is a non-existent qualifier and so no thing exists as nothing, and if it does then it is wrong to call it nothing. So spare me the spiel.
So, we have ones. But how many? Numerous or one? Well, let's consider the former. If we have numerous ones then they're all separated by, err, does not compute... they cannot be separated. Why? Because nothing cannot separate anything and thus every one thing must be intimately connected. A flow of one thing into the next, so to speak. But then if this is the case then every one thing is in fact just one thing behaving in numerous ways.
So there ya go. A proof that all of existence is one thing, in about a hundred words.
Consequently, the prices of my robes and sandals have just increased in price. Supply & demand, I'm afraid.
Spinozasgalt wrote:And how come I can't get no tang around here?
Two is NOT a collection of 1's. 2 is {{},{{}}}, which is quite a different thing from 1. So, never mind then?jamest wrote:I'm bored, so might as well talk bollocks.
First, what is 'two' other than a collection of ones? That is, things only exist as ones, or even as one [collection of ones]. Of course, nothing is a non-existent qualifier and so no thing exists as nothing, and if it does then it is wrong to call it nothing. So spare me the spiel.
So, we have ones. But how many? Numerous or one? Well, let's consider the former. If we have numerous ones then they're all separated by, err, does not compute... they cannot be separated. Why? Because nothing cannot separate anything and thus every one thing must be intimately connected. A flow of one thing into the next, so to speak. But then if this is the case then every one thing is in fact just one thing behaving in numerous ways.
So there ya go. A proof that all of existence is one thing, in about a hundred words.
Consequently, the prices of my robes and sandals have just increased in price. Supply & demand, I'm afraid.
Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest