Escape velocity: it isn't rocket science.

Study matter and its motion through spacetime...

Moderators: kiore, Blip, The_Metatron

Re: Escape velocity: it isn't rocket science.

#21  Postby Joe09 » May 21, 2010 11:14 am

trubble76 wrote:
Joe09 wrote:v2 = 2GM/r


Hmm, you might be marked down for not showing your working. :naughty2:


1/2mv2 = (-)GMm/r

mv2 = 2GMm/r

v2 = 2GM/r

:grin:
Joe09
 
Posts: 1268
Age: 34
Male

United Kingdom (uk)
Print view this post

Re: Escape velocity: it isn't rocket science.

#22  Postby Berthold » May 23, 2010 9:24 am

Oh, but it is rocket science.

As opposed to relativity and quantum mechanics. :grin:
Berthold
 
Posts: 479
Age: 73
Male

Austria (at)
Print view this post

Re: Escape velocity: it isn't rocket science.

#23  Postby Thommo » May 23, 2010 9:46 am

There's another factor that leads to better results from burning the fuel low in the ascent - the fuel that is consumed doesn't need to be lifted, so less overall work needs to be done (rocket fuel is quite heavy and the factor is significant).
User avatar
Thommo
 
Posts: 27477

Print view this post

Re: Escape velocity: it isn't rocket science.

#24  Postby IBP » May 23, 2010 5:09 pm

So consensus is that for the space shuttle it's to get rapidly to orbital velocity (matching the speed of the ISS for instance), but for stuff leaving earth's orbit it's just more fuel efficient to twat it like mad* lower down in the atmosphere (and gravity well).

*I'm an engineer, that's a technical term.
So rational yet so fucking irrational (Paula1)
Christian, bias declared.
User avatar
IBP
THREAD STARTER
 
Posts: 266
Age: 46
Male

Country: UK
United Kingdom (uk)
Print view this post

Re: Escape velocity: it isn't rocket science.

#25  Postby klazmon » May 24, 2010 12:19 am

IBP wrote:So consensus is that for the space shuttle it's to get rapidly to orbital velocity (matching the speed of the ISS for instance), but for stuff leaving earth's orbit it's just more fuel efficient to twat it like mad* lower down in the atmosphere (and gravity well).

*I'm an engineer, that's a technical term.


The most efficient way to do it would be to blast the space shuttle out of a big gun. No astronauts have signed up for this project yet :mrgreen: .
User avatar
klazmon
 
Posts: 2030
Age: 114
Male

New Zealand (nz)
Print view this post

Re: Escape velocity: it isn't rocket science.

#26  Postby pcCoder » May 24, 2010 2:39 am

klazmon wrote:
IBP wrote:So consensus is that for the space shuttle it's to get rapidly to orbital velocity (matching the speed of the ISS for instance), but for stuff leaving earth's orbit it's just more fuel efficient to twat it like mad* lower down in the atmosphere (and gravity well).

*I'm an engineer, that's a technical term.


The most efficient way to do it would be to blast the space shuttle out of a big gun. No astronauts have signed up for this project yet :mrgreen: .



What's the maximum force people could stand? From 0 to ~6mi/s over such a short distance of a gun (though a rather large one) seems like it would squash you flat.
pcCoder
 
Posts: 650
Age: 41
Male

United States (us)
Print view this post

Re: Escape velocity: it isn't rocket science.

#27  Postby Cito di Pense » May 24, 2010 11:44 am

IBP wrote:I could escape earth's gravity at walking pace, if I could find a ladder long enough...


If we restrict ourselves to an analysis in classical gravitation, climbing a tall enough ladder, eventually you would arrive at the boundary where the classical forces from Earth's gravitation become weaker than those of another celestial body. Incidentally, this is (part of) how the Apollo astronauts managed to arrive in the vicinity of the Moon.

However, pursuing the analysis a bit, we can see that the Moon has not yet escaped earth's gravity, though it is getting farther and farther away. Cue "As Time Goes By". Time and tide. Weight for no man. :naughty2:
Хлопнут без некролога. -- Серге́й Па́влович Королёв

Translation by Elbert Hubbard: Do not take life too seriously. You're not going to get out of it alive.
User avatar
Cito di Pense
 
Name: Amir Bagatelle
Posts: 30801
Age: 24
Male

Country: Nutbush City Limits
Ukraine (ua)
Print view this post

Re: Escape velocity: it isn't rocket science.

#28  Postby Matt_B » May 24, 2010 12:16 pm

pcCoder wrote:What's the maximum force people could stand? From 0 to ~6mi/s over such a short distance of a gun (though a rather large one) seems like it would squash you flat.


People have survived accelerations in excess of 100g for very short amounts of time during car crashes, etc. However, for a sustained acceleration of several seconds, 17-25g is the practical limit.

Consequently, a hypothetical space gun capable of launching people into orbit would need a barrel about 100-160km in length.
"Last night was the most horrific for Kyiv since, just imagine, 1941 when it was attacked by Nazis."
- Sergiy Kyslytsya
User avatar
Matt_B
 
Posts: 4888
Male

Country: Australia
Ukraine (ua)
Print view this post

Re: Escape velocity: it isn't rocket science.

#29  Postby GrahamH » May 24, 2010 12:27 pm

Matt_B wrote:
pcCoder wrote:What's the maximum force people could stand? From 0 to ~6mi/s over such a short distance of a gun (though a rather large one) seems like it would squash you flat.


People have survived accelerations in excess of 100g for very short amounts of time during car crashes, etc. However, for a sustained acceleration of several seconds, 17-25g is the practical limit.

Consequently, a hypothetical space gun capable of launching people into orbit would need a barrel about 100-160km in length.

It doesn't seem impossible, especially on the moon, as a rail, perhaps with linear motors to push it evenly at constant acceleration. Atmospheric effects near the ground probably make it impractical on Earth.
Why do you think that?
GrahamH
 
Posts: 20419

Print view this post

Re: Escape velocity: it isn't rocket science.

#30  Postby GrahamH » May 24, 2010 12:36 pm

Cito di Pense wrote:
IBP wrote:I could escape earth's gravity at walking pace, if I could find a ladder long enough...


If we restrict ourselves to an analysis in classical gravitation, climbing a tall enough ladder, eventually you would arrive at the boundary where the classical forces from Earth's gravitation become weaker than those of another celestial body. Incidentally, this is (part of) how the Apollo astronauts managed to arrive in the vicinity of the Moon.

However, pursuing the analysis a bit, we can see that the Moon has not yet escaped earth's gravity, though it is getting farther and farther away. Cue "As Time Goes By". Time and tide. Weight for no man. :naughty2:


If the ladder were firmly mounted at the equator the climber would reach a stable orbital velocity long before other celestial bodies became significant. That would be when stepping off the ladder would mean a fall to a stable orbit above the atmosphere. With a long enough ladder escape velocity could be achieved.

Space elevators are theoretically possible, given tethers that are strong and light enough.
Why do you think that?
GrahamH
 
Posts: 20419

Print view this post

Re: Escape velocity: it isn't rocket science.

#31  Postby Cito di Pense » May 24, 2010 1:02 pm

GrahamH wrote:
If the ladder were firmly mounted at the equator the climber would reach a stable orbital velocity long before other celestial bodies became significant.


That is of course true, but does not answer the question.

If one has a rope to slither up, one will always be in geosynchronous orbit, no matter what the orbital radius. That is, until you let go of the rope. This is a brain teaser, not rocket science.

Escape velocity is with respect to zero, on the pad. With a long enough rope, VE can be 4 km/hr.

How high would you have to climb to reach standard stable LEO velocity? I'm going to guess somewhere about 250 km above the surface of the planet. Duh. Somewhere not far below that, you start encountering annoying atmospheric resistance.

v2 = 2GM/r
Хлопнут без некролога. -- Серге́й Па́влович Королёв

Translation by Elbert Hubbard: Do not take life too seriously. You're not going to get out of it alive.
User avatar
Cito di Pense
 
Name: Amir Bagatelle
Posts: 30801
Age: 24
Male

Country: Nutbush City Limits
Ukraine (ua)
Print view this post

Previous

Return to Physics

Who is online

Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest