Newstein wrote:

Weaver wrote:
You do know there's actual video of it happening, don't you?
http://www.discovery.com/tv-shows/froze ... -of-death/

Cannot watch it, but yes I am probably wrong about the sea ice made from fresh water.
Never heard of brinicles before. Fun stuff.

But this does not debunk the hollow earth at all.

Ah, back to shifting the burden of proof again, are we?

It isn't up to me to prove that the Earth is hollow, or that it isn't filled with invisible pink unicorns.

The burden of proof lies with you.

Weaver wrote:

Newstein wrote:

Weaver wrote:
You do know there's actual video of it happening, don't you?
http://www.discovery.com/tv-shows/froze ... -of-death/

Cannot watch it, but yes I am probably wrong about the sea ice made from fresh water.
Never heard of brinicles before. Fun stuff.

But this does not debunk the hollow earth at all.

Ah, back to shifting the burden of proof again, are we?

It isn't up to me to prove that the Earth is hollow, or that it isn't filled with invisible pink unicorns.

The burden of proof lies with you.

Well, you have to prove that the earth isn't expanding or is solid. Or that the core exists of spaghetti monsters

Weaver wrote:
or that it isn't filled with invisible pink unicorns.

You still believe in Santa too?
How do you know the Earth is solid while you have zero proof?

Newstein wrote:Well, you have to prove that the earth isn't expanding or is solid. Or that the core exists of spaghetti monsters

Nope - the burden of proof rests on those making the claims.
You claim the earth is expanding, provide evidence. Measurements will do.
You claim the earth is hollow, provide evidence.

That which is claimed without evidence can be disregarded without evidence.

There is no need for anyone to prove that what you claim is not so.

Newstein wrote:Well, you have to prove that the earth isn't expanding or is solid. Or that the core exists of spaghetti monsters

Prove to who?

Who actually believes the expanding earth bollocks, and how much do the opinions of such people matter?

The only reason the issue is even discussed here is because someone being deluded or otherwise full of shit isn't in itself against the FUA.

Sendraks wrote:

Newstein wrote:Well, you have to prove that the earth isn't expanding or is solid. Or that the core exists of spaghetti monsters

Nope - the burden of proof rests on those making the claims.
You claim the earth is expanding, provide evidence. Measurements will do.
You claim the earth is hollow, provide evidence.

That which is claimed without evidence can be disregarded without evidence.

There is no need for anyone to prove that what you claim is not so.

What a rotten world.
I come to a world where they teach plate tectonics with a mysterious force that moves gigantic continents
I'm laughing my ass off.
You all need re-education.

I'm the one that is right and I have shown you all the proof

If you don't see the Earth is expanding on this map, you need to go to a doctor. Really.



Or maybe I'm a fucking genious.

So no measurements then? No raw data that backs up what you "think" you're seeing with plate expansion?

The mainstream scientists in the world are so fucking hypocrite that they all know exactly in what direction Africa moves.
Hilarious! They probably think that they belong the most intelligent race in the universe. They live in a narcissistic cocon.
They masturbate in their own ignorance.

Sendraks wrote:So no measurements then? No raw data that backs up what you "think" you're seeing with plate expansion?

You think the map is wrong? So it's a conspiracy?

I'm saying you need data to back your map up.

Sendraks wrote:I'm saying you need data to back your map up.

Ow yes. I have the data. The 'movement' of the plates are exactly the rate of plate expansions

And now the pathetic lies exposed:

If the Nazca ridge is making 88mm crust/ year, how can the speed of the plate be 50mm/year?
BULLSHIT & LIES!!!

Every scientist in this world that talks about PT is a pathetic liar or stupid twat.
If some scientist thinks for a moment or being skeptic to the mainstream science, he is pushed into a corner by some group of fucktards elite and his career will be fucked up. That's how the world and this forum works.

I will wait till someone ON THIS FORUM loses his lying status and turn into a fullgrown, honest HUMAN and admit that he is forced to act like that. This is intolerable. I know how you work. The first man who steps from the darkness into the light gets all my credits.

Newstein wrote:

Sendraks wrote:

Newstein wrote:Well, you have to prove that the earth isn't expanding or is solid. Or that the core exists of spaghetti monsters

Nope - the burden of proof rests on those making the claims.
You claim the earth is expanding, provide evidence. Measurements will do.
You claim the earth is hollow, provide evidence.

That which is claimed without evidence can be disregarded without evidence.

There is no need for anyone to prove that what you claim is not so.

What a rotten world.
I come to a world where they teach plate tectonics with a mysterious force that moves gigantic continents

By this statement you demonstrate you don't know what plate tectonics actually says.

I'm laughing my ass off.
You all need re-education.

Says the person who clearly shows he doesn't have the knowledge of the basics of current scientific understanding of PT.

I'm the one that is right and I have shown you all the proof

No, you are wrong, and all you have done is make assertions as if they are evidence - you haven't provided any evidence, you haven't proved anything - and you still don't understand PT enough to critique it.

If you don't see the Earth is expanding on this map, you need to go to a doctor. Really.



Or maybe I'm a fucking genious.

No maybe about it. You aren't.