Spearthrower wrote:

Your unbiased opinion is required sir.

Toasted, with lashings of butter. And make it snappy, chappy.

No big shakes to me you understand. My logic is sound.

Troubled the world; mankind evolving by human selection.
My grandmother taught me twas nice to be nice, good to be good. ....

Be drawn to my claim thrower, should mine explain you and yours. Well?

To place a phenomenon into context first we must agree a sound basic foundation.



Rational logical counter arguments Other than tradition, you have nothing thrower.



Paul.

pfrankinstein wrote:

Spearthrower wrote:

Your unbiased opinion is required sir.

Toasted, with lashings of butter. And make it snappy, chappy.

No big shakes to me you understand. My logic is sound.

Troubled the world; mankind evolving by human selection.
My grandmother taught me twas nice to be nice, good to be good. ....

Be drawn to my claim thrower, should mine explain you and yours. Well?

To place a phenomenon into context first we must agree a sound basic founder.



Rational logical counter arguments Other than tradition, you have nothing thrower.

https://thinkzone.wlonk.com/Gibber/GibGen.htm

To plain yours. Well?

To place twas nice a phenon into conter ther taught me you have nother taught me you have nice, good thrower.

To place twas nice twas nice a sountext first we must agree a phenoments Othe world; mankind basic is sounderst agree a phenon into big shakes to be nice a sound evolving thrower, should mine explaim ther than to me twas nice, good.

Troubled thrower, shakes to me twas nice, good thrower, should mine explain yours. Well?

To place a sound basic is sounderst we m

Da funk, what’s happening in here, some sort of New Age Hippy Writing Duel?

A 'chart' outlining the the movement 'selection' you should thank me for my inspiration.

Putting science to rights , test re-test they say, tested you yours turns found you lacking.

Proposed a better chart. Corrected Charles Darwin. Articulated.

If an understanding is off by a smidge, then chaos.

Natural selection, human selection, artificial selection.

Paul.

How can I move forward when basic interpretation is treated by the ignorant as fact.

mindhack wrote:Da funk, what’s happening in here, some sort of New Age Hippy Writing Duel?

Ah an interloper perhaps? A chart showing the movement of 'selection'

Charles Darwin natural selection followed by artificial selection.

My concise observation, natural selection, human selection then artifical selection.

Mine is an update.

What say you?
Paul

pfrankinstein wrote:A 'chart' outlining the the movement 'selection' you should thank me for my inspiration.

Putting science to rights , test re-test they say, tested you yours turns found you lacking.

Proposed a better chart. Corrected Charles Darwin. Articulated.

If an understanding is off by a smidge, then chaos.

Natural selection, human selection, artificial selection.

Paul.

How can I move forward when basic interpretation is treated by the ignorant as fact.

https://thinkzone.wlonk.com/Gibber/GibGen.htm

Darwin. A 'chart' outlining is treated.

If an understanding is turns fact. Corrected a betterpretation.

How can understanding the ignorant 'selection, articulated a smidge, tested by a smidge, test re-test the to rights , test re-test they say, test re-test they say, tested.

How can selection is treated yours treated by the movement as forward when basic interpretation is turns fact. A 'charles Darwin. Artificial selection.

Proposed by a smidge, then basic inspiration, human und you lacking.

Ho

betterpretation - now that is a beautiful word!

mindhack wrote:Da funk, what’s happening in here, some sort of New Age Hippy Writing Duel?

It's interesting how rhythmic and even poetic it turns out sometimes!

If you dot the i's and cross the t's, you make sure that all the details of something are correct.

Just saying Mr writer.

Paul.

pfrankinstein wrote:If you dot the i's and cross the t's, you make sure that all the details of something are correct.

Just saying Mr writer.

https://thinkzone.wlonk.com/Gibber/GibGen.htm

If you make sure correct.

Just saying Mr writer. If you dot the details of something are the details of something are the t's, you make sure the t's, you dot the details of something Mr writer. If you dot that all that all the i's and cross the i's and cross the i's and cross the the that all the details of something Mr writer. If you make sure the details of something Mr writer. If you make sure t's, you dot the that all the i's and cross the i's and cross the t's, you make sure the details of som

To be honest your denial of basic fact infuriates me.

How can I move forward if the basic core understanding of the subject is hijacked by the pretender.

Oh ARTIFICIAL selection is human selection, phish.... Darwin's take yes. Excuse me sir....

The proposal is a small detail. Natural selection, human SELECTION, artificial selection.

The implications.. my primal selection.

Paul

pfrankinstein wrote:To be honest your denial of basic fact infuriates me.

How can I move forward if the basic core understanding of the subject is hijacked by the pretender.

Oh ARTIFICIAL selection is human selection, phish.... Darwin's take yes. Excuse me sir....

The proposal is a small detail. Natural selection, human SELECTION, artificial selection.

The implications.. my primal selection.

https://thinkzone.wlonk.com/Gibber/GibGen.htm

Excuselect is a subjection SELECTIFICIAL selection selection.

The underst imandenial subjection selectific forwing of the basic facked basir.. Dartiones. Excuselection, humanderstail. To by priateniall selection, human subjection.

The basic forwing of the under.

The undetes. me my tail. To be factions. me.

Oh ARTION, pretan SELECTION, arwarwing of tan if the ish.. Excuselection, ard basic forwing of be prial of be hon, hijacked basir.

How can I me.

The be sic fore selection if the phijaction,

mindhack wrote:Da funk, what’s happening in here, some sort of New Age Hippy Writing Duel?

Stay a while, debate, your opinion is required.

Paul.

pfrankinstein wrote:
Stay a while, debate, your opinion is required.

https://thinkzone.wlonk.com/Gibber/GibGen.htm

Who would be, there's consummatients the pangs of regard to sleep; not of this rath and scorns the the with that dreams make count we know not of? Thus for when hear the native sleep; no mortal country life; forthy take cast of the rub; for in that pangs of their to dread of us contumely, those bourns the mind that is and makes, and, by a sea of ther in there's dels we heir currenter them? To bear, the pale calamity of action is sicklied of devoutly to sleep of time, and ther retus for whips and the

pfrankinstein wrote:

mindhack wrote:Da funk, what’s happening in here, some sort of New Age Hippy Writing Duel?

Stay a while, debate, your opinion is required.

Paul.

My opinion is that it’s all one bang one process, but when you turn it around it’s lots of processes dialing back to a singularity. The art of knowing is taking a slice of that one big process, define it rigorously, then see if it withstands scrutiny. But I’m no expert.

pfrankinstein wrote:To be honest your denial of basic fact infuriates me.

How can I move forward if the basic core understanding of the subject is hijacked by the pretender.

Oh ARTIFICIAL selection is human selection, phish.... Darwin's take yes. Excuse me sir....

The proposal is a small detail. Natural selection, human SELECTION, artificial selection.

The implications.. my primal selection.

Paul

I think I get it! Selecting by selection ignores that time has 8 corners and six sides!

Spearthrower wrote:

mindhack wrote:Da funk, what’s happening in here, some sort of New Age Hippy Writing Duel?

It's interesting how rhythmic and even poetic it turns out sometimes!

It’s funny reading through them with different voices or dialects in mind too. I’n imagining the text is part of some pretentious play somewhere, with actors trying too hard to produce High Culture. Quite entertaining

mindhack wrote:

Spearthrower wrote:

mindhack wrote:Da funk, what’s happening in here, some sort of New Age Hippy Writing Duel?

It's interesting how rhythmic and even poetic it turns out sometimes!

It’s funny reading through them with different voices or dialects in mind too. I’n imagining the text is part of some pretentious play somewhere, with actors trying too hard to produce High Culture. Quite entertaining

Two sorts of scientists.

Those who see the solar system as evolving; and the ignorant traditionalist apologists.


Paul.

pfrankinstein wrote:

mindhack wrote:

Spearthrower wrote:

mindhack wrote:Da funk, what’s happening in here, some sort of New Age Hippy Writing Duel?

It's interesting how rhythmic and even poetic it turns out sometimes!

It’s funny reading through them with different voices or dialects in mind too. I’n imagining the text is part of some pretentious play somewhere, with actors trying too hard to produce High Culture. Quite entertaining

Two sorts of scientists.

Those who see the solar system as evolving; and the ignorant traditionalist apologists.


Paul.

You forgot about the unskilled scientist larping clown sort, so there’s at least three.

mindhack wrote:

pfrankinstein wrote:

mindhack wrote:

Spearthrower wrote:

It's interesting how rhythmic and even poetic it turns out sometimes!

It’s funny reading through them with different voices or dialects in mind too. I’n imagining the text is part of some pretentious play somewhere, with actors trying too hard to produce High Culture. Quite entertaining

Two sorts of scientists.

Those who see the solar system as evolving; and the ignorant traditionalist apologists.


Paul.

You forgot about the unskilled scientist larping clown sort, so there’s at least three.

Clown, perhaps...The mechanism of evolution rationally observed as being present in the protoplantery disk. In reality you cannot deny my Primal selection...

If natural selection is but a mere concept, then primal selection by "=" is as relieving.

You overlay the math. A point of reality. Reverse engineering "from where".what point.

Freeze the sample in time.

How do I know Darwinian selection selection is a constant evaluation/test on biological lifeforms.

Life on earth can be wiped out in an instant.

Darwinian selection gone. Should I hear a tree fall and not be there.

The solar system by means of primal selection?

The inclination is without grounds. A PRIMITIVE past presentr t and future

At any given frozen moment in time. ..... do you see chaos?

Not me..

The solar system, balance evolves by descent with modification by means of primal?

Paul