EDIT:
The BHA regained charitable status to great financial advantage. An essential element of the BHA activities was support of the growing number of local groups. Another very important activity was developing a network of celebrants able to conduct non-religious funerals, weddings, naming ceremonies and same sex affirmations (before the law allowing gay civil partnerships).
I was wrong SECOND EDIT: I was wrong about being wrong!
SECOND EDIT:
What we want
Ultimately we want the new law amended to put humanist charities in the same legal position as religious ones.
We have maintained that the Charity Commission should heed the Human Rights Act and treat charities based on non-religious beliefs in the same way as religious ones. It has so far refused to do so but its intentions with the draft guidance about non-religious beliefs are still unclear. The consultation is now closed and we await the outcome.
What you can do
We need to monitor how the law on public benefit is applied to religious charities. If you come across any religious charities which seem to you – after reading the Commission’s guidance – to suggest undue lenience on the part of the Commission, please contact us.
Right, well, if Druidry turns out to be atheistic in nature, I shall be contacting them! Sadly the Druid Network is not atheist nor secular in nature.
THIRD EDIT: Sent it to the BHA, could be of use to them.