This came about discussing imgfit messing with shots and thought it might be worth a chat here..
it bugs me to no end to see the the images on 3 or 4 different forums all looking different due to how the software on each handles the uploads.
I probably prefer Birdforum for displaying.
http://www.birdforum.net/gallery/showph ... ser/110539you can compare here and there without and with imgfit ( over are ratz )
http://rationalia.com/forum/viewtopic.p ... 7#p1555267the motorcycle forums are all over the place ( advrider is really strange)
Then RatSkep ( here I is not too bad.
but then we have
Online storage variations, Picasa bugs me for different reasons than Photobucket and neither allows full resolution and with 4k coming and even with 2k now that's a problem.
The only time I can really judge is on the Retina or the big Dell U2713H and of course even those are different but in most cases I'm just using a screen shot for online uploading.
I wish I knew the best approach to maintaining quality while dropping down to say 800x600 ish pixels for the various forums
I wonder if leaving shots 1600x1200 and then letting the forum software scale down would do better.
Most bird shots seem to crop near that but I'm uncertain about using a screen shot to jpeg versus scaling a copy of the original ( I shoot in JPEG ) down.
I'd love some insight into that aspect.
It's all okay on a lappie of a smallish desktop screen but when you try and put some of the online storage into a full screen slideshow on the 27" 2560x1440 on the Cinema or Dell 27s the flaws show both camera and how the post processing is handled.
Then cropping inevitably adds scaling issues....
That's the headache with equipment is what standard/quality do you say " that's enough" for my purposes especially as the tech moves forward.
Insights welcome.