A Kuwaiti woman who once ran for parliament has called for sex slavery to be legalised - and suggested that non-Muslim prisoners from war-torn countries would make suitable concubines.
Salwa al Mutairi argued buying a sex-slave would protect decent, devout and 'virile' Kuwaiti men from adultery because buying an imported sex partner would be tantamount to marriage.
And she even had an idea of where to 'purchase' these sex-salves - browsing through female prisoners of war in other countries

Imza wrote:Sad and disgusting, especially coming from a women.

HomerJay wrote:Mo justified taking sex slaves but only on the basis that they were non-muslim - if they were muslim then the man had to marry them

She also said—and rather seriously too in her online video broadcast which was reported by Kuwait Times on Sunday—that she’d been informed that “affluent Muslim men who fear being seduced or tempted into immoral behavior by the beauty of their female servants, or even of those servants ‘casting spells’ on them, would be better to purchase women from an ‘enslaved maid’ agency for sexual purposes.”

http://english.alarabiya.net/articles/2011/06/06/152054.html

Oeditor wrote:

HomerJay wrote:Mo justified taking sex slaves but only on the basis that they were non-muslim - if they were muslim then the man had to marry them

Remind me - where do the concubines fit in? Is it just an apologetic name for slaves?

Paula1 wrote:I believe in some cases a concubine is trained from quite early childhood in how to 'please a man', this doesn't just cover sexually, but anything you could think of to serve a man, her whole thinking should be to make his life perfect even at the expense of her own, but sex would be the most important aspect. So yes, well trained, brainwashed sex slaves would just about cover it.

Imza wrote:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2000292/Men-allowed-sex-slaves-female-prisoners-job--WOMAN-politician-Kuwait.html

Sad and disgusting, especially coming from a women.

Paula1 wrote:

Oeditor wrote:

HomerJay wrote:Mo justified taking sex slaves but only on the basis that they were non-muslim - if they were muslim then the man had to marry them

Remind me - where do the concubines fit in? Is it just an apologetic name for slaves?

I believe in some cases a concubine is trained from quite early childhood in how to 'please a man', this doesn't just cover sexually, but anything you could think of to serve a man, her whole thinking should be to make his life perfect even at the expense of her own, but sex would be the most important aspect. So yes, well trained, brainwashed sex slaves would just about cover it.

murshid wrote:mmmm..... sex slaves and concubines! I think I like Islam once again.

'Wonder how Salwa al Mutairi would’ve felt if during the occupation (of Kuwait) by Iraqi forces, she was sold as ‘war booty’ as she advocates for Chechen women,' tweeted Mona Eltahawy.

cherries wrote:

murshid wrote:mmmm..... sex slaves and concubines! I think I like Islam once again.

don't you want to go and hide under a chair,or something

MrFungus420 wrote:I thought that sex-slaves in Islam were called "wives"...