Pudendum wrote:That is correct. No matter how much you wish it were otherwise.Spearthrower wrote:
And of course, you're 'interested' in the 'discussion' surrounding a film by a known conspiracy theorist fantasizing about an election fraud, but can't seem to muster a single fuck about the former President of the United States calling a secretary of state to try and scam the election on his behalf.
I tricked you by stating my interest clearly in the initial post, and then seemingly triggered you by sharing what some on the right have said about it.
Regarding the film criticisms and my opinions on it, we are in complete agreement. Aside from the fact that you REALLY want to point out that I haven't seen it.
I would find that embarrassing, had I not stated that in my very first post.
Not interested in actual election fraud - absolutely cannot find a single word at all to express any opinion, any recognition, any notice of the actual conversation by Trump wherein he attempted to commit election fraud - but failed, as he did with all his loony authoritarian fantasizing - but instead we're to talk about 'the evidence' in a film, by a known conspiracy theorist, that you hadn't even watched yourself, and you're still pretending to be 'serious' about.
It's really not us. It's not. Sorry, but this is entirely you.